are they mike jackson's real children?

[fabulouslyghetto]

Fact is it is highly unlikely that michael would have 2 kids of mixed race that would come out they way those 2 did.

That's not a fact.

The real issue is Michael trotted those kids around from day one as his own biological kids. That's why there is confusion and debate over this.

How was he supposed to "trot them around." Are you supposed to treat your kids differently when you don't share their DNA?

And since when is this a "real issue?" The garbage strike in Canada? Real issue. Turbulence in the Middle East? Real issue. Child trafficking? Real issue. Gay rights? Real issue.

DNA of Michael's kids? Superficial gossip.

 

[aliasman]

That's not a fact.



How was he supposed to "trot them around." Are you supposed to treat your kids differently when you don't share their DNA?

And since when is this a "real issue?" The garbage strike in Canada? Real issue. Turbulence in the Middle East? Real issue. Child trafficking? Real issue. Gay rights? Real issue.

DNA of Michael's kids? Superficial gossip.

Dude for all of us discussing/debating this topic, it is a real issue. And by all accounts I suspect it is quite real to you too.

Just for clarification, we actually have a Municipal(city) workers strike here in Toronto (not just garbage) another small city close to us, Windsor, have a similar strike. You could stretch it and say we have a Municipal workers strike in Ontario (although that's quite a huge generalization), but saying a strike in Canada is way off.

 

[tavares]

DNA of Michael's kids? Superficial gossip.

As much as we argue about my opinion on your excessive attempts at trying appear intellectually superior to every last person who disagrees with you on a topic -- I must say I agree with you on this. This thread and its [STRIKE]obnoxious[/STRIKE] creator is acting like nobody ever claimed children that weren't biologically theirs as their own.

After all, when you adopt, you only adopt kids that look exactly like you and share your DNA, right?

 

[fabulouslyghetto]

but saying a strike in Canada is way off.

The strike is in Canada.

As much as we argue about my opinion on your excessive attempts at trying appear intellectually superior to every last person who disagrees with you on a topic -- I must say I agree with you on this. This thread and its [STRIKE]obnoxious[/STRIKE] creator is acting like nobody ever claimed children that weren't biologically theirs as their own.

After all, when you adopt, you only adopt kids that look exactly like you and share your DNA, right?

Girl boom, I am intellectually superior to every last person who disagrees with me. They did an article about it in Time Magazine.

 

[Dcloset]

They're his children. Not his sperm, but he is their father.

Close this shitty topic.

 

[theworldwithout]

No, they are not his biological children.

He has raised them and cared for them since their birth though, and in the eye's of the law he is their father. So yes, they are his.

 

[bankside]

Blue eyes can be recessive for more than one generation.

Also, vitiligo could make those kids whiter than they are now. Hmm. Who do we know in the Jackson family with vitiligo? Hmm.

 

[tennis6]

another thread about someones children....also inappropriate...