Barebacking appreciation thread

[treanir]

I am confused by that as well. Is he insinuating 'gang bangers' should have to go through chemotherapy? Is he using 'that' as an adjective, pronoun or conjunction? That's a little insulting to those whom have had cancer...

'That cancer' refers to gangbangers. So in his view, chemotherapy is to cancer as killing is to gangbangers i.e. a cure/a way to get rid of it.

 

[rareboy]

Thanks at least someone here understands analogies.

It is not analogous. Chemotherapy does not terminate life in order to cure cancer.

This only proves that you are intellectually insufficient to be trusted with the concept of analogy.

 

[jdbadboy]

Don't seed the troll.

 

[bankside]

It isn't an analogy so much as metaphor. As a metaphor, it works. As public policy, not so much.

 

[Críostóir]

Well of all the immature replies to subject that I have read on JUB that beats them all.

A childish "shoot them" or "I hate" is not an intelligent approach to any solution. Extermination of a section of the population in a civilised society has been seen to be possible but in these present times how many people see it as anything more than an atrocity?

Do you really believe it to be acceptable to start another holocaust? Just think carefully over the side affects. It is too easy to sit at home and throw out a stupid remark believing it makes you seem cleverer or cooler than the rest.

You know, 'childish' is a pretty good descriptor for In Actuality's draconian suggestions. I wonder if he's really old enough to be on here? The shoot-someone-as-the-solution-to-every-problem thing is one I've seen only from people under 15. Or do I just know unusually mature young people?

bloody hell. you have some serious issues.

please tell us you are in therapy and that you only post when the staff take off the straight jacket.

He sure does like the idea of killing people, doesn't he?

I scan first then I read. If it doesn't look appetizing I ignore.

That would be why anyone is still reading your comments. You picked a damn pretty picture as your avatar, and it catches the eye. Too bad your opinions would fit in better in the Ft. Lauderdale chapter of the HJ than in a gay forum.

It's really an awful lot like hearing someone say that because of the excesses of Wall Street bankers, all capitalists should be shot dead. That would even upset ME, because I don't believe killing people generally solves problems (I think capitalists should be re-educated in nice camps).

 

[MyReply]

Someone start a AZT appreciation thread.

 

[Críostóir]

I scan first then I read. If it doesn't look appetizing I ignore.

Now he's gone. Personally I'd like it if we could tell the difference between him deleting his own profile and having his profile deleted by the mods.

 

[SilverWolf]

Now he's gone. Personally I'd like it if we could tell the difference between him deleting his own profile and having his profile deleted by the mods.

I always thought "guest" meant you self-deleted. Banned just meant the mods banned you but left your profile alone. If the mods deleted you, your profile disappears like you never existed in the first place.

I could be wrong but that's what I always thought.

 

[CorporalAris]

Maybe it's just me, but I've never felt someone cum inside me. The one time I was in a monogamous, we did bareback, (after being tested, of course) and while I knew he was cumming, but I couldn't feel it. So. You know.

 

[rareboy]

I've no doubt he'll re-appear under a new nom de guerre.

 

[Críostóir]

I always thought "guest" meant you self-deleted. Banned just meant the mods banned you but left your profile alone. If the mods deleted you, your profile disappears like you never existed in the first place.

I could be wrong but that's what I always thought.

OK, that makes sense. But why would he self-delete? Because we figured out that he's underage?

 

[SilverWolf]

OK, that makes sense. But why would he self-delete? Because we figured out that he's underage?

Edit: Lex said it better than me

 

[Críostóir]

I've no doubt he'll re-appear [STRIKE]under a new nom de guerre[/STRIKE] using a new sockpuppet.

FTFY filler filler filler

 

[G-Lexington]

>>>But why would he self-delete? Because we figured out that he's underage?

I'm sure he grew weary of close-minded bigots who couldn't accept a viewpoint outside of their own, predetermined ones.

Some white supremacist told me that's why he stopped dealing with one group once, and it seems to fit here.

Lex

 

[Críostóir]

I "asked the moderators," and the mod who answered said this:

"Guest" means that THEY self deleted.

BANNED under their user title means that the Mods had something directly involved with their departure.

A self deletion could be for a multiple of reasons.

I was a little surprised myself to see In Actuality as a "guest."

But it wasn't because of any action taken on the Mod Team's part.

 

[Críostóir]

Not much of a loss, if I may humbly insert my opinion into the fray.

I have to agree.

 

[bankside]

Okay, off topic and nothing to do with barebacking, but my theory is that we regularly run into people who have probably been seen by, or referred to a psychologist or psychiatrist or therapist at some point because social interactions don't turn out the way they envision.

No different on the internet, and no different on this forum.. Social differences are just something some of us have an easier time figuring out, and when things don't go as planned there is no reason why a guy shouldn't try again.

Anyway, back on topic, barebacking rocks if it won't kill you. So go monogamous and enjoy it. I have actually felt my guy, but he can hit the ceiling on a good day and I doubt he can say the same, because subtlety's my game. I love the feeling though.

 

[Críostóir]

Okay, off topic and nothing to do with barebacking, but my theory is that we regularly run into people who have probably been seen by, or referred to a psychologist or psychiatrist or therapist at some point because social interactions don't turn out the way they envision.

No different on the internet, and no different on this forum.. Social differences are just something some of us have an easier time figuring out, and when things don't go as planned there is no reason why a guy shouldn't try again.

Are you talking about In Actuality here? Are you saying it's OK to delete your profile and come back as someone else?

I can't agree. I think people should face up to their mistakes, not pretend to be someone else who never made them. If In Actuality realized he was wrong to call for the murder of barebackers, he should say "you're right, that's wrong and fascistic and now I've thought better of it." I would have a lot of respect for someone who did that.

 

[Críostóir]

why are people doubting that im real lol? oh yeah you guys u totally caught me! im a robot! sprrrruuunnnnnggggg

Don't be offended. First, it was In Actuality who doubted your reality, and he's not exactly in good odor with this community!

But also, we do get a certain number of people on here who falsify their identities and experiences. Frequently they pop up just when a controversial topic is being discussed.

You have very few posts here, so the community doesn't know you yet; your name is very topic-specific; you posted a new thread on a controversial topic. These are behaviors that match those of trolls and sock puppets. That doesn't mean you are one, but it's not unreasonable for people to be suspicious.

 

[Gussss]

Don't be offended. First, it was In Actuality who doubted your reality, and he's not exactly in good odor with this community!

Did you mean that, or was it a typo?