"Your OPINION aside, norton is actually a very good antivirus and firewall software package. If you know how to use it and configure it properly. It's not a resource hog, unless there's something wrong with your computer already, or it's über old."
No, my INFORMED opinion from using computers since 1985 (that would be since grade five in school - that's 21 years of using computers) is that Norton is a resource hog. Yes, it's my opinion and you have your opinion but my opinion comes from years of experience with computers and using Norton/Symantec products (basically since Norton started making anything). I'm an IT professional (a director of a hosting provider) and I've done tech support for ISPs, have you done any of this?
My computer is a year old and in any computers I've owned, Norton has been a resource hog - it hooks into more resources than it needs to and it drains RAM like a whirlpool.. so the point about "It's not a resource hog unless you have an older computer" is false. Any of my friends who have used Norton have also said it's a resource hog.
My processor might be a shit Celeron (it has nothing to do with the processor) but I have 1gig of RAM and about half a TB of hard drive space. I installed Norton once and it slowed the whole thing down so again, that disproves your little argument.
I know what I'm talking about, thanks, but I'm not a complete idiot. If you think I'm a complete idiot, throw me on ignore then and don't make comments about my opinion. "Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one."
You also shouldn't have to have a huge amount of RAM to even run an antivirus program and if you do, the program you're using is a RAM hog (again, my point).
Try Googling for customer opinion type sites and you'll see I'm not just ranting about nothing.
AVG is fairly light and does the same job with less RAM usage and less hard drive space.
Ok first off, Read my signature and u'll see why i'm qualified to give MY INFORMED OPINION.
I have three degrees, one in computer science, one in graphic design, and one in PC Game Art and Design. I've been using computers since i was 4years old, that would be 1987, that's 19 years. And i've been building my own computers since i was 15.
So MY OPINION is based on 19 years of working with computers, 8 years of building them, and 5 years of servicing and supporting them, 4 years of which i owned and operated my own local computer service and repair company, right after high school i might add. So i too and an IT professional. And now i design, program, and create content for computer games for a living, i think i know a thing or two about what i'm speaking of.
So lets define resource hog here. Currently on my computer (Core2Duo e6700 @ 3.00GHz, 4GB DDR2-800 RAM, 1.5TB HDD space, WinXP x64), all norton tasks are taking up a combined total of 38,112KB of RAM, a pittance. Especially considering i'm running a 64bit operating system and every task takes slightly more memory than it would on a 32bit system.
So if you call virus protection that takes up 38,112KB of RAM a "resource hog", then be my guest. I dont. I call that a pittance of memory, even for your system with 1GB of RAM, which is well worth it. Now the only cases where 38,112KB of RAM is a "resource hog" is on a system with 512MB or 256MB of RAM; in which case that's 7.44% or 14.88% of total RAM. But again i might point out, a system like that is: AN ÜBER OLD SYSTEM.
Now, your assertion that a processor has nothing to do with this is flat out wrong. What do you think determines how fast a process completes on your computer? If you have a faster processor, then any tasks, including norton incidentals, will run quicker.
And your assertation that you installed norton once and it did A. and B. is hardly proof of any kind. Lets get with it here, you can't prove a statement one way or another just by saying, "i did this once and i didn't like the result."
So, let's recap, you have an opinion, i have an opinion, and even this little emoticon
has one. Lets just leave it at that and be done with this?