Hot new John Carter of Mars. Trailer

[Zoomie]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

It seems like it's not as good as I'd hoped from the reviews, but I'll probably check it out once the theatrical run is finished.

 

[Matt89]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

The story is a mess but it's still a great watch.

 

[MisterMajestic]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

That's all I need to know about this movie. I'm going to see them on the big screen.

They are 2 Gorgeous people....Lynn is Prettier but Taylor has better "hair"......The Cam also shows a split second-shot of Taylor's Ass..Blink or don't blink you still might miss it (it's quick)...

To rebuke your comment about Banner being replaced by Mark Ruffalo, it should be noted that before Edward Norton, Banner was portrayed by Eric Bana, and yes, the Incredible Hulk IS a sequel to Ang Lee's HULK.

just sayin'...

Blah, blah and more blah.....Ed is still THE MAN regardless....And I'm gonna tear into Mark's Sexy Face if he Fucks up the part....And I'm gonna do it in your honor...

 

[FanofFiction]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

John Carter looks terrible. The only promising aspect of the movie for me is the sexy lead actor running around shirtless for two hours. A film critic on CTV News suggested the problem with John Carter is that all the films to have come out in the past few decades which were inspired or influenced by JC delivered the most compelling aspects of the JC story. So the film comes with a built in "been there, seen that already" quality... which is exactly how I feel about the trailer.

On Ed Norton; Norton wanted in. I found a lot of interviews where Norton voiced anger about not being cast. This one stands out for me: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=35290

 

[gsdx]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

"John Carter," Disney's $250 million sci-fi spectacular, floundered at the domestic box office in its opening weekend, pulling in only $30.6 million, according to studio estimates. Universal's "The Lorax," a $70 million animated picture in its second week of release, beat it by almost $9 million.

Not that anyone expected otherwise.

In fact, the closest thing to a surprise is that "John Carter" performed as well as it did. On Thursday, Disney said it "aspired" to an opening above $30 million, but tracking had it a few million dollars below that.

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/john-carter-pulls-only-30-6m-weekend-box-160324704.html

$250 million. The entire budget for LotR trilogy was only $285 million. 'More' doesn't always mean 'better', apparently.

 

[MisterMajestic]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

John Carter looks terrible. The only promising aspect of the movie for me is the sexy lead actor running around shirtless for two hours.

Shirtless and Muscular Thighs & Legs for 2hrs10min...It'll be on DVD by May.....

On Ed Norton; Norton wanted in. I found a lot of interviews where Norton voiced anger about not being cast. This one stands out for me: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=35290

Of course Ed wanted in..."The Avengers" is gonna be a block-buster...Ed GAVE Marvel-Studios a Blockbuster with Hulk and they diss him like that...

Mark Ruffalo probably Fucked the Casting Director or one of the the Producers @ some point in his career...

 

[Adrock-JD]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

I used to assume; give me a hot young actor in skimpy clothing and stunning special effects and I'll watch anything.

I was wrong.

 

[Matt89]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

lol well I disagree with you all then. I watched the whole thing, did not get bored once and really liked it.

 

[maxpowr9]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

I used to assume; give me a hot young actor in skimpy clothing and stunning special effects and I'll watch anything.

I was wrong.

Yet TC hates Game of Thrones. Taylor Kitsch is a pansy compared to Jason Mamoa. Jason can make girls' pussies wet with 4 words.

 

[Adrock-JD]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

lol well I disagree with you all then. I watched the whole thing, did not get bored once and really liked it.

I'm glad someone enjoyed it.

Yet TC hates Game of Thrones. Taylor Kitsch is a pansy compared to Jason Mamoa. Jason can make girls' pussies wet with 4 words.

Jason Mamoa and Joe Flannigan on Stargate Atlantis made it absolutely fabulous.
Jason Mamoa in that Lifetime movie "Tempted" had me glued to the set. I did not care what was going on as long as they kept him in as little clothing as possible.

 

[RobinGoodfellow]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

The movie was a mixture of corn-ball-dialogue courtesy of the screenwriter, Very attractive Actors and great special effects...The action scenes and special effects don't save "John Carter"...The Director was all over the place and lost his way....I havent read the book but Disney should have trusted the film to someone else...The films budgest was well over $200-Million and they should have hired a Masterful Director that could handle such a task......

It's from Edgar Rice Burroughs, and you were expecting Shakespeare-style dialogue? Seriously? Part of what makes Burroughs fun to watch is his cheesy dialogue and over-the-top action; the movie looks fine to me. Sometimes you want steak and sometimes you want a little cheese; Burroughs is arguably one of the best cheeses out there. Next you'll be saying how you were disappointed in Conan for its lack of subtlety....

If you're a Sci-Fi Geek like me you're probably making plans to see "John Carter"....You won't be able to say you wasnt warned..........

Yeah, by someone who got his fan card in a box of Cracker Jacks....

RG

 

[MisterMajestic]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

lol well I disagree with you all then. I watched the whole thing, did not get bored once and really liked it.

You must've seen a different version in Australia.......

 

[Matt89]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

Nope I just love movies and scifi

 

[maxpowr9]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

Even looking at the money behind it: Game of Thrones has 10 hours of footage and cost about $50 million to make. John Carter cost 5 times as much and has 80% less footage. Clearly there is a lot of money that went somewhere it probably should not have.

 

[gsdx]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

Even looking at the money behind it: Game of Thrones has 10 hours of footage and cost about $50 million to make. John Carter cost 5 times as much and has 80% less footage. Clearly there is a lot of money that went somewhere it probably should not have.

Add another $100 million plus for promotion.

 

[Matt89]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

And I hate Game Of Thrones lol

 

[RobinGoodfellow]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

Add another $100 million plus for promotion.

Keep in mind that the advertising budget is usually about 2-2.5 times the budget of the movie, and right now the trailer is getting a lot of air on the Disney channels....

RG

 

[DigitalFudge]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

Ugh why is this thread getting more exposure than the fucking movie.


Let this shit flop like the film

 

[lolalola70]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

i saw it over the week-end. it wasn't that bad-shirtless taylor definitely helps a lot.
i'd be surprised if there's a sequel. i don't understand why it cost 250 million to make
most of it looked like it was shot in the desert. happily taylor's costume wasn't much-that couldn't have cost much. must have been some pretty xpensive cgi.

 

[gsdx]

Re: John Carter (What was Disney thinking?)

Keep in mind that the advertising budget is usually about 2-2.5 times the budget of the movie, and right now the trailer is getting a lot of air on the Disney channels....

RG

I was just relaying a figure I read. Disney knew before the release that the movie was going to bomb, but decided to promote it anyway - just not quite as aggressively. (Sorry. No idea where the article is anymore.)