The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Museum Field Trip Deemed Too Revealing - Teacher's Job Lost

Croynan

In Memory of Shaun
In Loving Memory
JUB Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Posts
15,344
Reaction score
23
Points
0
Location
California
](*,) ](*,)

The New York Times

September 30, 2006

Museum Field Trip Deemed Too Revealing

By RALPH BLUMENTHAL

FRISCO, Tex., Sept. 28 — “Keep the ‘Art’ in ‘Smart’ and ‘Heart,’ ” Sydney McGee had posted on her Web site at Wilma Fisher Elementary School in this moneyed boomtown that is gobbling up the farm fields north of Dallas.

But Ms. McGee, 51, a popular art teacher with 28 years in the classroom, is out of a job after leading her fifth-grade classes last April through the Dallas Museum of Art. One of her students saw nude art in the museum, and after the child’s parent complained, the teacher was suspended.

Although the tour had been approved by the principal, and the 89 students were accompanied by 4 other teachers, at least 12 parents and a museum docent, Ms. McGee said, she was called to the principal the next day and “bashed.”

She later received a memorandum in which the principal, Nancy Lawson, wrote: “During a study trip that you planned for fifth graders, students were exposed to nude statues and other nude art representations.” It cited additional complaints, which Ms. McGee has challenged.

The school board suspended her with pay on Sept. 22.

In a newsletter e-mailed to parents this week, the principal and Rick Reedy, superintendent of the Frisco Independent School District, said that Ms. McGee had been denied transfer to another school in the district, that her annual contract would not be renewed and that a replacement had been interviewed.

The episode has dumbfounded and exasperated many in and out of this mushrooming exurb, where nearly two dozen new schools have been built in the last decade and computers outnumber students three to one.

A representative of the Texas State Teachers Association, which has sprung to Ms. McGee’s defense, calls it “the first ‘nudity-in-a-museum case’ we have seen.”

“Teachers get in trouble for a variety of reasons,” said the association’s general counsel, Kevin Lungwitz, “but I’ve never heard of a teacher getting in trouble for taking her kiddoes on an approved trip to an art museum.”

John R. Lane, director of the museum, said he had no information on why Ms. McGee had been disciplined.

“I think you can walk into the Dallas Museum of Art and see nothing that would cause concern,” Mr. Lane said.

Over the past decade, more than half a million students, including about a thousand from other Frisco schools, have toured the museum’s collection of 26,000 works spanning 5,000 years, he said, “without a single complaint.” One school recently did cancel a scheduled visit, he said. He did not have its name.

The uproar has swamped Frisco school switchboards and prompted some Dallas-area television stations to broadcast images of statues from the museum with areas of the anatomy blacked out.

Ms. Lawson and Mr. Reedy did not return calls. A spokeswoman for the school district referred questions to the school board’s lawyer, Randy Gibbs. Mr. Gibbs said, “there was a parent who complained, relating the complaint of a child,” but he said he did not know details.

In the May 18 memorandum to Ms. McGee, Ms. Lawson faulted her for not displaying enough student art and for “wearing flip-flops” to work; Ms. McGee said she was wearing Via Spiga brand sandals. In citing the students’ exposure to nude art, Ms. Lawson also said “time was not used wisely for learning during the trip,” adding that parents and teachers had complained and that Ms. McGee should have toured the route by herself first. But Ms. McGee said she did exactly that.:confused: :confused: :confused:

In the latest of several statements, the district contended that the trip had been poorly planned. But Mr. Gibbs, the district’s lawyer, acknowledged that Ms. Lawson had approved it.

“This is not about a field trip to a museum,” the principal and superintendent told parents in their e-mail message Wednesday, citing “performance concerns” and other criticisms of Ms. McGee’s work, which she disputes. “The timing of circumstances has allowed the teacher to wave that banner and it has played well in the media,” they wrote.

They took issue with Ms. McGee’s planning of the outing. “No teacher’s job status, however, would be jeopardized based on students’ incidental viewing of nude art,” they wrote.

Ms. McGee and her lawyer, Rogge Dunn, who are exploring legal action, say that her past job evaluations had been consistently superior until the museum trip and only turned negative afterward. They have copies of evaluations that bear out the assertion.

Retracing her route this week through the museum’s European and contemporary galleries, Ms. McGee passed the marble torso of a Greek youth from a funerary relief, circa 330 B.C.; its label reads, “his nude body has the radiant purity of an athlete in his prime.” She passed sculptor Auguste Rodin’s tormented “Shade;” Aristide Maillol’s “Flora,” with her clingy sheer garment; and Jean Arp’s “Star in a Dream.”

None, Ms. McGee said, seemed offensive.

“This is very painful and getting more so,” she said, her eyes moistening. “I’m so into art. I look at it for its value, what each civilization has left behind.”

School officials have not named the child who complained or any particular artwork at issue, although Ms. McGee said her puzzlement was compounded when Ms. Lawson referred at times to “an abstract nude sculpture.”

Ms. McGee, a fifth-generation Texan who has a grown daughter, won a monthly teacher award in 2004 from a local newspaper. She said the loss of her $57,600-a-year job could jeopardize her mortgage and compound her health problems, including a heart ailment.

Some parents have come to Ms. McGee’s defense. Joan Grande said her 11-year-old daughter, Olivia, attended the museum tour.

“She enjoyed the day very much,” Ms. Grande said. “She did mention some nude art but she didn’t make a big deal of it and neither did I.” She said that if Ms. McGee’s job ratings were high before the incident, “something isn’t right” about the suspension.

Another parent, Maijken Kozcara, said Ms. McGee had taught her children effectively.

“I thought she was the greatest,” Ms. Kozcara said. But “knowing Texas, the way things work here” she said of the teacher’s suspension, “I wasn’t really amazed. I was like, ‘Yeah, right.’ ”

:grrr: :grrr: :grrr: :grrr: :grrr:

eM.:(
 
“something isn’t right” about the suspension.

I'll say..

I really don't think I've ever heard of a parent complaining about something their child saw at an art museum. I remember seeing a nude statue or 2 at the museum. Hell, there is even one outside on the city street.
 
](*,) ](*,)

Now here is an administrator who is truly concerned and cares about his teachers.

How great it must be to know when one has such fine support while being in the classroom.

Let the administrator go to the museum and find out what all the trouble is about and what items were seen as offensive by a single student/parent.

:grrr: :grrr:

eM.:(
 
I know, there is so much about this situation that bothers me.

The administrator not standing up for a trip he approved & a teacher with over 28 years experience. The parent that complained in the first place. And the fact that people have no ability to distinguish between porn & art ((a topic we had recently at JUB))
 
This is a sad, sad, sad situation. I can believe it, because of the "nut jobs" that are in Texas and the U.S.A., today. Remember, John Ashcroft put "wraps" on the statues in the Justice Department.
 
Suspended WITH pay. Like that is a punishment?

I wish they did that in the real business world.
 
Between the wearing of flip-flops and the blatant attempt to corrupt the morals of her students by exposing them to this so called "art", it's obvious that she is nothing more than an agent of the liberal left and the gay mafia. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that she's a vegetarian on top of everything else.
 
... Remember, John Ashcroft put "wraps" on the statues in the Justice Department.

Exactly the comment I was going to make. I get so tired of these "upright, Christian moralists" deciding what is decent and what should be surpressed. Whatever happened to "Art for the Sake of Art?"
 
As an Art Historian I must say: "art for Art's sake" is nearly dead.

Don't worry, art too will one day Shrug.

Who is John Galt?
 
People get offended so easily, it's ridiculous. Reminds me of the gay history month in Philadelphia; a few upset people ruining things for everyone. These parents act like their kids were shown hardcore porn. I've been to that museum, and it's great! It'll be a loss if school kids can no longer visit.
 
It is too soon to know the truth in this he-said-she-said situation. Teachers, usually unionized, are pretty hard to fire. If there is indeed a duplicity on the administration's part trying to cover up an ignoble reason to fire her, then it will out when adjudicated.

I'm not convinced all the facts are out. Fired employees have their own histories.

If litigation proves it was the field trip, then I'll be outraged. Just now, it's only something to watch and see.

Unfortunately, there's a letter from the principal to the teacher that says

“During a study trip that you planned for fifth graders, students were exposed to nude statues and other nude art representations.”

That's so mind-boggling by itself that I don't really care whether there are other reasons for firing the teacher or not.

Considering that some of the greatest religious art includes depictions of male genitalia -- Michelangelo's David and Creation of Adam, for starters -- this statement is so far off any possible ideological spectrum that it's well into loony bin territory.
 
People get offended so easily, it's ridiculous.

It's more ridiculous that people don't stand up to these idiots.

If a parent tells the principal, "I don't approve of this", the principal should say, "Well, the rest of Dallas doesn't seem to have a problem with it. Next time, don't give your child permission to go."
 
Can we PLEASE just cut texas off and let it sink into the Gulf... haven't we waiting long enough yet?
 
Can we PLEASE just cut texas off and let it sink into the Gulf... haven't we waiting long enough yet?
We'd have to remake the flags. So, we'll take Puerto Rico instead!


I recall every trip I attended required parental consent. What exactly did this parent think one would see? What about the museum of natural history and a half-naked rendition of a neanderthal?

This reminds me about the twit who didn't want her son saying the pledge of allegiance because SHE was an atheist.

Fuckers.
 
Can we PLEASE just cut texas off and let it sink into the Gulf... haven't we waiting long enough yet?


I suppose that is a better solution than mine. I was thinking of something thermo-nuclear, but I suppose we'd have to worry about the fallout. So, yeah, letting it sink into the Gulf sounds good.
 
Honestly, some of you yanks are completely insane. All this because we still didn't even see Janet Jackson's boob?

What next - is a gym going to get sued because someone saw someone else naked in the locker room there? Or a hospital because someone's gown slipped open?

Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than get offended over nothing? Please, someone, take a flamethrower to the place.

-d-
 
Why is it the minority that seems to stir up the most dis-content?

I thought majority ruled?

Now are museums gonna be off limits for students?

If so, then I think the end of the world is certainly nearby!

I mean, if children canNOT be given examples of the "great masters" and all their works, what will the world become?

I am so mad I could just spit about this!(*8*) (*8*) :kiss: :kiss:
 
I wish we could find out who the parent was and just bash them...really now, what harm has this caused your kid? So he saw some nudity, big deal! It is not going ruin his life or affect his education. If anything, he gets a little bit more cultured.
 
This is why, after spending almost a decade in Dallas, I got the hell out.

That's not to say all Texans are bad. They're not. I love "y'all". :-)

But there is a certain large contingent there that are the most two-faced people you'd ever want to meet. On the one hand spouting "Christian values", on the other being the most immoral people you'd ever want to meet.

Frisco is a well-to-do, up & coming suburb. There is probably some very wealthy parent there that got upset for no reason, and threatened to run the principal or school board out at the next election, using money and influence.

And the principal just caved.
 
Back
Top