The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Roy Moore

24991426_738375689692015_6203615639102156181_n.jpg
 
I had to laugh at the complete 180 Trump has taking after the results were known. You just know he is the sort of bloke who would kick old ladies and children out of the way, to get that seat in a lifeboat.

I can only imagine the turmoil in the WH at this moment. No doubt Moore will be blaming the Gays, blacks and those damn liberals for his defeat.
 
^ I thought the economy was flourishing, and the man has absolutely no problem with being branded a paedophile. A man with no morals should not be preaching the morals of others.

Oh, and the 60 million abortions? I'd like to know how much bitching he'd be doing if his government had to support a lot of them.
 
I had to laugh at the complete 180 Trump has taking after the results were known. You just know he is the sort of bloke who would kick old ladies and children out of the way, to get that seat in a lifeboat.

I can only imagine the turmoil in the WH at this moment. No doubt Moore will be blaming the Gays, blacks and those damn liberals for his defeat.

He is blaming the gays and transgenders and abortionists etc. , over and over again as he refuses to, concede defeat, gonna leave it up to God. McConnell had a different tune a few years back when Scott Brown was elected in one of these mid-termers around the time of the Health Insurance vote. Obama actually agreed and Brown was seated before the vote. Another Republican with a very short "memory". Hypocrites!
 
Another Republican with a very short "memory". Hypocrites!

What do you expect? Most of them can't even remember the 10 Commandments, especially 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and that's only because I don't know if they swear, honour the Sabbath (is playing golf considered dishonourable?), or have committed murder.
 
Where's Ben? The only thing more disgraceful than backing a child molester is backing a child molester who couldn't beat a liberal in redneck country. Gotta be pretty embarrassing to sell your morals up the river only to lose.
 
No. Being conservative, my posts are delayed until they are censored.
 
No. Being conservative, my posts are delayed until they are censored.


Well Ben, when you say racist crap, it's against the rules. I know it must be frustrating that so much of the Republican talking points get censored for being racist crap.

...lie down with dogs...
 
He is blaming the gays and transgenders...
And in a bit of poetic justice, Doug Jones is the father of a gay son.
DQ5hHNfUEAAI-IP.jpg

DQ5rI1cXcAAK0CS.jpg

DQ5rI1WX0Aky5k2.jpg

21373309_171712310066045_8832591667174309888_n.jpg

22344397_122369401806157_2135205135364653056_n.jpg

18094655_466369117038959_2132735318716055552_n.jpg
 
No. Being conservative, my posts are delayed until they are censored.

I don't believe this to be the case.

Interestingly, Opinterph recently talked about the intent behind this type of restriction in a thread Taralen made:
I understand being passionate about a particular topic. That is perfectly okay. What is not okay is to allow that passion to overrule reasonable restraint. I explained to you quite clearly why I placed a restriction on your account. The restriction is not intended as punishment, nor is it appropriate for any moderator to use the restriction as a means to prevent you from sharing legitimate opinions, points of view, or whatever topics you may wish to post.

The restriction is intended to make you think before you submit your posts and to help prevent you from doing something which could result in you being banned from the site. This particular restriction is most often used to keep an eye on newbie members who arrive with a disturbing introduction. In my opinion, it is not an ideal option to remain engaged over a long period of time. (Whatever is at issue should get resolved, so the restriction can be removed.)

And I can see why the mods believe that you need this restriction because there is evidence that you don't have a full understanding of the Code of Conduct. Meaning you're liable to unintentionally break the rules.

For example, you stated that we're not allowed to talk about different cultures here on the forum. To which Opinterph explained that this isn't a true statement and clarified.

There are plenty of conservatives on this forum that are not under this restriction. Your viewpoint itself, as far as the evidence leads me to believe, is not the issue.

I think there's room for you to improve how you interact with the people on this forum. Your communication skills seem to be lacking because if you are trying to engage with others in good faith it's clearly not coming across based on the hostility I see in reaction to you.

I also feel there's a big issue of you pushing misinformation. For example, you responded almost indignantly to Kallipolis about Obama's supposed 'Muslim sympathies' then linked to a Snopes article that ostensibly supports your refutation but when you read the full article it shows that the quote is a fragment of hateful things Obama is expressing the future does not belong to. (That thread seems like a great study resource because it shows the building frustration of your peers because they're not seeing what you're trying to convey as a part of the discussion.)

I've also seen you tell people questioning their bisexuality to watch lesbian porn and if that doesn't work for them they're probably gay. Which I'm rather doubtful of as a metric of sexuality considering how lesbian porn is among the most searched terms by women. And as a bisexual I find the suggestion that if lesbian porn doesn't turn a dude on that they likely aren't bi very harmful.

Please consider changing your approach, taking a little more time to read over articles, and try working with the mods so that they feel comfortable taking you off of restriction. Perhaps we could meet you halfway in this thread about misperceptions we suspect others have about us.
 
Back
Top