The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Rubbers

but they keep my feet dry...
il_fullxfull.477907114_24d0.jpg
 
Yes or No
I say No with today's medicine

I wouldn't want to influence anyone else's decision, nor do I need anyone's permission, but I don't use condoms because I can't feel anything when wearing them.

And I produce so much precum that they would usually slip off, anyway. I gave up on them long ago.
 
Yes or No
I say No with today's medicine
Ultimately, it's a risk assessment.

Men who want to have multiple partners decide if the experience is more important than the future consquences of venereal disease, as well as the changed response when any potential partner asks or demands for you to be "clean" and "disease free." The marketing of Prep has carefully chosen "undetectable" instead of uninfected. It is likely HIV carriers are also now doing some verbal gymnastics of their own.

And, to some degree, the partners in a monogamous relationship are making the same risk assessment, but with the added factor to consider whether trusting the partner is more important than the potential effects of learning he may have been rambling and brought home something.

We tend to think this is a modern problem, but it has always existed in some form, but without condoms as a consideration.
 
Ultimately, it's a risk assessment.

Men who want to have multiple partners decide if the experience is more important than the future consquences of venereal disease, as well as the changed response when any potential partner asks or demands for you to be "clean" and "disease free." The marketing of Prep has carefully chosen "undetectable" instead of uninfected. It is likely HIV carriers are also now doing some verbal gymnastics of their own.

And, to some degree, the partners in a monogamous relationship are making the same risk assessment, but with the added factor to consider whether trusting the partner is more important than the potential effects of learning he may have been rambling and brought home something.

We tend to think this is a modern problem, but it has always existed in some form, but without condoms as a consideration.
Thanks for your reply
 
I always said this would happen
PreP is all very well but it only protects you from HIV. You can still catch all the other nasties that lurk in the promiscuous.
Moreover, apparently condom use because of the AIDS crisis brought the other STI's down as well.

Not thought of that before now.
 
Back
Top