^That wouldn't be bad, do they even have enough winners to make a season though? Or they could do a winners vs a runners up tribe =P
They could now! Kim was the tenth individual woman to win Survivor, and they had ten men a long time ago. At worst they could just do a 16 or 18 person season if a bunch of winners were unavailable/declined.
Men (13) - Richard, Ethan, Brian, Chris, Tom, Aras, Yul, Earl, Todd, Bob, JT, Jud, Rob
Women (11) - Tina, Vecepia, Jenna, Sandra, Amber, Danni, Parvati, Natalie, Sophie, Kim, Denise
Even though some of these people have been kind of overexposed (ROB), I wouldn't mind seeing them in an all-winners season. It would have been more interesting when Jenna and Ethan were still a couple because then there'd be the potential for Jethan vs. Romber (or worse, a couples alliance). It'd be interesting to see how the "dominant" winners (Brian/Tom/Yul/Earl/Kim) would all play against each other, how Hatch/Todd would get along, whether Parvati or Kim would be the alpha female, how far Sandra would get after winning twice, and which of the under the radar women would win the game. All-Stars/returning player seasons almost lend themselves to a woman winning because the men are all targeting each other for being "threats," so I'd bet one of Vecepia, Amber, Danni or Natalie would win.