The "internets" is as good as an excuse to lie as is being drunk is an legit excuse for doing something wrong. There are real people on here who make real connections, so much so that people tend to meet up.
We once had a long discussion here on JUB. I don't even recall what the topic was, but I pulled out this analogy. I'll repeat it here, because I think I may need it soon.
As a pedestrian, I've been struck by a car twice. Both times, I was in an intersection, and I had the walk signal. Both times, I was struck by a car which had a red light, but which was turning right into oncoming traffic. They had looked to the left to verify no car was coming, but not to the right to check for a pedestrian. In both cases, the driver was clearly in the wrong, and I was in the right.
Now, each time I'm crossing the street, I keep a lookout for just such a scenario. With a car turning right on red into oncoming traffic, I make very sure that they see me, and to leave myself an escape route if they attempt to make a run for it without looking. Sometimes that means not even crossing until after the car makes their turn.
In the previous discussion, I pulled this story out because the argument was running along the lines of "But you're not doing anything wrong! You're in the right! Therefore, you shouldn't have to do anything!" Which is true of me in the case of my car story, as well. But see,
I don't like to get hit by a car. It's not fun. Being "in the right" won't be much comfort if I have a broken leg or an extended hospital stay. I'd rather skip the hospital trip if at all possible. And that means taking extra steps
even though I'm not doing anything wrong.
So what's this got to do with this topic? Well...
Your logic just seems like you are making excuses for crappy behaviour.
I'm not excusing the behavior. I'm just aware that it occurs, the same way I'm aware (now - it only took two car strikes) that these right-turners exist. Yes, those car should look in the intersection before driving off. But guess what - some of them don't. And, as you've seen, I can't count on them doing so. So I have to take some extra steps to protect myself. Because I can't regulate their behavior - I can only regulate my own.
I feel the same way about online relationships. Some of them are whimsical and fun and casual, like most of my gargoyle-on-JUB relationships. Some of them are more serious than that. I met more than one sexual partner online, and I'm partnered to one. But I didn't trust these people to "do the right thing" when I first met them. I went in knowing full well they could be lying through their teeth. Maybe for malicious reasons, maybe for shits and giggles. So I proceeded slowly with those relationships. When I feel a bond growing, I work on verifying it. I move from PM to e-mail to phone. I skype sometimes. I'm aware that everything being told to me that I can't verify might be utter bullshit. Not because I think it's great that people lie, but because I'm aware that they do.
I don't want to suggest that if you fall for a sock puppet, you're some sort of rube. I don't "blame" you and let the sock puppet off the hook. I just think the smart move is to proceed with caution, because these things do happen.
Lex