that's definition #5 of the entryI am confused. I thought a troll was a creepy old guy who cruised bathrooms and parks looking for dicks to suck. I guess calling one that is an insult???
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
that's definition #5 of the entryI am confused. I thought a troll was a creepy old guy who cruised bathrooms and parks looking for dicks to suck. I guess calling one that is an insult???
Sometimes, people aren't consciously aware of how others perceive them.
Well, it's true I haven't read a demeaning word (but can imagine those which are thought) when I say that I consider I'm genuinely I'm gay even if I've sometimes fucked "pretty girls" or young women, and eve when there are many "nice gay" guys I could happily hang with but whom I wouldn't dare touch bare naked with the tip of my dickBullshit. You are just mad at me because you got owned by me repeatedly together with the other pro-circumcision fanatics in that circ thread that got locked by mods. Some guy even called me a cunt and said I should be shot in the head, which goes to show just how mad at me you and the other fanatics got.
I never said anything in this board that warrants me being called a troll, and I dare anyone to prove otherwise. So I mentioned in a thread that, even though I am straight I sometimes find pretty boys attractive, and several guys started to make several accusations and assumptions about my sexuality and, when I defend myself, I am a "troll"? Get real! the word "troll" is abused ad nauseum in this board and it is pathetic. "Troll" is basically the way to call someone you hate a moron and son of a mother, because it is the one word that is tolerated by the mods. I should actually been given a medal for patience and fortitude fro wityhstanding so many bitchy, catty remarks being thrown my way without replying in kind.
Ha! Nope, just a shitty minor thesis on translation in which discussion on technical translation forced me to make some statements about language, science, rationality, literature and what not...(...)(Did you really write a book about the definitions and applications of "awareness"?)
(...)
He is aware, he rationally "senses" he is perceived as a troll because people say he is a troll... that he gets emotional on that is already something secondary derived from it. It's such a basic "intellectual level" that you take it for granted: once you assume h understands English you are ready to call it "emotional rather than the "intellectual" operation it is. A really purely emotional "sense" of a situation couldn't even relate "him" and "being perceived a a troll". But it's true that when rational operations become a habit we tend to assimilate them to "emotion" or even irrationality, and that's why people may find animals irrational without being "intellectually aware" that they are just as mechanical and "irrational" in rtheir daily lives, and the very habit of considering animals "irrational" is "irrational" itself.(...)
Did you read Dduder's last post? He was the poster to whom I earlier referred. Do you understand my original point about "some people are not sufficiently aware of how others perceive them"?
I think he senses on an emotional level that his posts are being perceived as trolling; however, on an intellectual level, he has absolutely no clue as to why...
