LiquidSky
JUB Addict
No surprise...Pretty much all whites say it behind closed doors.
BULLSHIT!
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
No surprise...Pretty much all whites say it behind closed doors.
And is being called a "whitey" the same as being called a "nigger" or any of the other racial slurs that I won't repeat regarding Jews, Asians, etc.? A white person is white. I have a problem equating being called "whitey" and the ugliness of the "n" word.
Keep your apology. Doubt it's sincere.
Yes, it was a cheap shot; then again, I'm not the one defending racist statements. And the spelling was not at issue; rather, the "duh" statement was re: it not being "honkey".First of all, the "you should have" was a cheap shot. And I wasn't sure of the spelling of the word and admitted up front. If that's not smart enough for your judgement, then too bad.
I agree that saying that SOME whites harbor racist thoughts is not inherently racist. However, saying that ALL whites harbor them and say racist things behind closed doors is, and that is inherently racist (saying that there are some racists in a population is, I feel, a given truth; saying that ALL members of a population are racists is an insult to that population). In essence, you are defending an inherently racist statement.To say that some whites harbor racist thoughts about blacks is not inherently racist. It's a suspicion that blacks have about how things are run in this country. It's one thing to disagree with that statement but to call it inherently racist?
I'm hardly downplaying it; that's your job. I'm merely noting that the statement is racist. Now, had slammed Dog himself for saying it, and that he deserved to be cancelled, that would have been cool; that's a legit point. However, he made the point that the entire white segment of the population was racist; by taking it too far he went from making a legit point to a racist statement, and it's that statement that you are defending...
I don't agree with Pices' generalization, but I can understand why he made it. If anything , RG is downplaying the problem too much, an error in the other direction.
Using small words then: A word's usage shouldn't depend on the person's skin color for context. If you as a black person can use it to denote friendship, then I as a white person should also be able to use it for the same. I'm reminded of the Girlfriends episode in which one of the girl's white friends keeps using the word (or a an equiv), and one of the other girls is offended by it, even though she's using it just as a black woman would have used it. If she had been offended at the actual usage, no prob; instead she was offended that a white person was using it.As for your remarks regarding Glafna, their garbled and confusing. Because of the historical use of the word, it isn't ok for a White to call a Black a nigger. You might not think it's fair but that's the way it is. And this world doesn't need White's to fight for their right to use the "n" word.
Not that glib, actually. You're just lacking historical context; almost all of the racist terms for non-blacks were pretty much drained of their power by the 70's. Only one major term remained (guess which one...), and that's because the race in question had decided to make it part of their culture as a way to do depower it rather than rejecting it outright. Thus, rather than running its course as the other terms did, it's still here...I think your response to the question of why "honkey' doesn't have the same power to hurt whites as "n***" to hurt blacks is shallow and glib and doesn't answer the question.
I wasn't trying to negate yours; I was trying to point out how you are defending racist statements. Just by pointing out that there is a difference between the way we see black people says more about your attitude than mine.You see what you see when you look at Blacks. I see what I see. There are some Blacks who oppose use of the n- word among themselves. Your observations don't negate mine.
What are these points? Unless of course you mean his racist ones....And when has Pices Ken made good points?
Right here in this thread.
At least I'm not the racist...And since this has gotten ugly, I'll just say that you're sarcastic, nasty attitude only undermines the points you're trying to make.
Well I'm not surprised by the responses from falcon, jy_star, latinostar(who gives a damn about your ethnicity), and the others... They will always be in denial, and bring up the most ridiculous responses, and ignore the TRUE topic of this THREAD. You always go OFF subject.. truly amazing!!
SoapSkank, I really do appreciate some of your responses, and you actually did reply to the subject at hand.. along with ljhotboy, who did bring up a great point.
Most whites will smile in your face, and will talk to you sometimes.. but marry one of their children, or date one.. TRUE colors will be revealed, that goes for the majority of whites... sorry, but that's the facts.
I didn't agree with some of what you stated, but interesting responses nonetheless. There are some good whites.
BTW where is "Glafna" he hasn't replied yet.
If you were referring to post #43 the "H" word was not "Honkey"In fact as my new Hawaiian friend pointed out that "H" word is misunderstood by many to be derogatory but isnt.
