There is quite a range of belief within modern Christianity on the topic/dogma of heaven.
Progressive theologians hold that it is a Utopic goal that will be realized when we purge ourselves and the world of its evil: greed, envy, cruelty, selfishness, etc., a sort of collectivve nirvana. That is obviously heavily influenced by Hinduism and inroads made into Western thought by the adoption of Eastern Mysticism by philosophers in the Industrial Era and after.
Traditional believers take it quite literally as an afterlife and society where the human spirit endures without the pathos and suffering of the corporeal world and the competition and conflict it brings. Many concepts within Judaism and Christianity evolved to imagine it as an imperial court, likely because that was the most cherished life imaginable for most cultures, with a caste system and everyone quite privileged and living among riches.
There are also glints of a more abstract paradise, with references to lions lying down with lambs, etc., but even that is referred to as a kingdom.
In between the two are those who hold that the afterlife is real, but that the Atonement within Christian dogma is an injection and overinterpretation of the Judaic custom of damning their enemies to the hatred of God, hence a dichotomy grows of the absolute torture of Hell versus the bliss of Heaven. This trend in thinking evolved into the doctrine of Universal Atonement, holding that the Atonement was real, but was absolute and complete, meaning no profession of faith or "magic words" like the Fundamentalists propagate, are necessary, as the diviine intervention on the cross forever closed the gap of separation between fallen man and the perfection of the Divine.
My own faith is toward the progressive side, but with a goodly measure of Calvinism thrown in. We were never of the "name it, claim it" strain of Evangelicals. Grace is more akin to Divine fiat, so presuming to merit it goes against the very nature of the Creation as created beings. For reference, the discourse between Job and his Maker at the end of the story convey the mood, a sort of imperial disdain for arrogant presumption of man, and particularly for those who seek to justify themselves. This wisdom writing is not unlike the tone of the Eastern religions that teach of the emptying of self in order to gain enlightenment, plus the concept that it is really beyond us after we've done whatever we can to live as better humans in this world.
A very concise depiction of this humility on the scales is the apocryphal poem by Leigh Hunt of Abu Ben Adhem:
Abou Ben Adhem (may his tribe increase!) Awoke one night from a deep dream of peace, And saw, within the moonlight in his room, Making it rich, and like a lily in bloom, An angel writing in a book of gold:— Exceeding peace had made Ben Adhem bold, And to the presence in the room he said, "What…
www.poetryfoundation.org
The intent is clear evidence of the growing rejection of the damnation dogma by thinkers in the West, a movement we now term Syncretism. Bumper stickers display it with the multiple icons of diverse major religions.
So, I fall in that general part of the Venn diagram, believing in the afterlife, but not believing it is some royal court of luxury and privilege, more a transcendent existence freed from the vice that corrupts this plane of existence. And I believe we are created beings, and that evolution is a part of that creative process, and that, just as we did not understand evolution for the majority of our collective existence, we do not now understand our next stage, nor even what we will learn as a species in the here and now.
Just as anti-religionists attack the concept of Heaven as a cruel, manipulative, and empty myth, many within the subject religions also reject it as a misconstrued tenet in the past ages, as sugar teat to quiet the crying child, so to speak. Rather, we believe it is the symbol of hope, a terminus that pulls us up to be better people among people, to be better stewards of what we have, and the planet. We do not aspire out of fear, or out of presumption, or of greed, to see a better existence, both here and hereafter. There is a hint that if we do not prepare here by adopting our thinking and values, that we will not be able to transition. That may be borrowed from Hinduism, that one doesn't progress unless one learns what is necessary as one is incarnate.
All that to say "yes" but with context.