The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Define "straight'

straight finds women attractive and into women.

"staight acting" i don't like to use that term.
 
Kinsey, et al. [1948]

"Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.

While emphasising the continuity of the gradations between exclusively heterosexual and exclusively homosexual histories, it has seemed desirable to develop some sort of classification which could be based on the relative amounts of heterosexual and homosexual experience or response in each history... An individual may be assigned a position on this scale, for each period in his life.... A seven-point scale comes nearer to showing the many gradations that actually exist."​
 
It certainly isn't getting blown and blow every once in a while as some people imply... :roll:
 
oh jesus this again?

why is it gay men think it's completely normal that "straight" men would absolutely want to have another man suck their dick, but the reverse scenario of a gay man wanting a woman to suck his penis is horrifying?

here's a tip. STRAIGHT MEN DON'T HAVE SEX WITH OTHER MEN. END OF STORY.
 
bw92116 said:
Straight: Only attracted to the opposite gender.
Click to expand...

I don't even know how that is even possible or more specifically how did I go so long growing up being only attracted to women.:D

But, in my opinion straight would just be what I quoted above. And myself I am bi but, in the sense I love to play with cock and I wouldn't immediately tell a women I was trying to get that I was bi becuase, she would think I was gay and not interested in her even though I would be. So , I would self identify as str8 but, technically not be str8.
 
Why are we getting bogged down with labels? What difference does it make if a person is gay, straight, bi, curious, or any other label we want to put on people? If two people love each other and enjoy each other's company, then these labels are not important. Relationships are important. Life is just to damn short to waste time worrying about such things.
 
All male sexuality is fetish sexuality. There is NO other. So, a str8 is a fetishist of the female in the medical sense, as he is unable to orgasm outside fantasies about females.

http://www.fetishguide.org/Fetish-Personal.html

Defining fetishism as related only to inanimate objects is a societal exercice in self-deception widely practiced by medics, psychologists and the like. If a trauma would be at the origin of a fetish, then a trauma is also at the origin of str8ness.

All male sexuality is fetish sexuality. I am a fetishist of the male in the medical sense. By stimulating str8ness as the only acceptable sexuality, society turned it into a total perversion.
 
I think the reason this question gets asked (besides a lot of wishful thinking) is confusion between "straight" and "straight-identified."

"Straight" means heterosexual, attracted to the opposite sex and only the opposite sex. As a number of comments upstream have confirmed, a man who enjoys getting a BJ from another man is not straight.

"Straight-identified," on the other hand, refers to men whose public persona is that of a heterosexual male. He looks straight, he acts straight, he's attracted to women and fucks them when he can. He considers himself straight. But he is not 100% hetero because he feels occasional attraction to other men and occasionally enjoys sex with them. Those are the key points: desire and enjoyment. Has no desire for men and does not enjoy sex with them = straight. Desires men and enjoys sex with them = not straight, but possibly straight-identified.

By and large, many of us who say we like straight guys are most attracted to the first type; but men we actually have sex with are the second.

On the other hand, I have to disagree with:

Straight men find the thought of getting intimate with another hairy faced, rugged dude vomit-worthy and so will never engage in such behavior no matter how much some gays wish they would.
Click to expand...

That may be the most common attitude, but I think a man could be heterosexual--a clearer term than "straight"--and yet not be repulsed by homosexual sex, just indifferent to and uninterested in it. Not to muddy the waters further, but I think some heterosexual men who feel this way can be persuaded, usually by money but sometimes by other factors, such as pity or curiosity, to participate in homosexual sex; they just won't enjoy it--probably won't even be able to get an erection, let alone cum--unless the circumstances are very unusual.
 
boxerdudeuk said:
oh jesus this again?

why is it gay men think it's completely normal that "straight" men would absolutely want to have another man suck their dick, but the reverse scenario of a gay man wanting a woman to suck his penis is horrifying?

here's a tip. STRAIGHT MEN DON'T HAVE SEX WITH OTHER MEN. END OF STORY.
Click to expand...

THANK YOU!!
 
searchcz said:
Kinsey, et al. [1948]

"Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.

While emphasising the continuity of the gradations between exclusively heterosexual and exclusively homosexual histories, it has seemed desirable to develop some sort of classification which could be based on the relative amounts of heterosexual and homosexual experience or response in each history... An individual may be assigned a position on this scale, for each period in his life.... A seven-point scale comes nearer to showing the many gradations that actually exist."​
Click to expand...


I'm glad you quoted Kinsey. He was brilliant in his sexual studies, even if he became slightly..off..towards his later years.

I agree with his perspective and point. There are only, maybe, 2 men that I've met in my life who fully, IMHO, really fit the general description of "straight". Every other man I've interacted with, on whatever level, could have been seduced.

Then again, I'm a good seducer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top