The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Giving Furries a bad name?

What does this have to do with Furries and why would his psychopathy give all of them a bad name?

His story is horrific, but he is a rara avis because of the tragic mis-wiring in his brain.
 
rareboy said:
What does this have to do with Furries and why would his psychopathy give all of them a bad name?

His story is horrific, but he is a rara avis because of the tragic mis-wiring in his brain.
Click to expand...

Because in the U.S. there is an overlap between a sub-section people that dress up as (cartoon) animals, the Furries, have sex with actual animals and are interested as well in erotica (and sex) with minors.

Furry communities with underage members have been targeted by mature groomers in the past.

Just how legitimate this connection is to all Furries rather than just a small subset (that is the same size of the sunset such people of other sexual orientations) remains to be seen, but in at least one case the connection is there.

There was a YouTube who documented such cases (including the infamous Mr. Hands, who died after receiving anal sex from a stallion, but was in no way connected to underage pornography or child porn).

He might still be there, haven't looked for him for a long time.

I don't think JUB is the platform to discuss folks having sex with animals -that's not for here-
but if animals get truly mistreated -as seems to be the case here with the dogs- it should be (remain) outlawed.

Of course, the argument that farm-animals/pets cannot give consent to sexual intercourse with humans seems somewhat beside the point;
They didn't consent to becoming my ribeye steak or the belt in my trousers either.

Torturing, maiming and killing higher animals for sexual gratification of humans alone seems wrong to me.

Not to mention under false pretexts, such as mr. Britton seems to have done.

I may have gone too far for JUB already. It is not my wish to turn our beautiful community/forums towards in-depth discussions of the laws that set the borders of permissable sexual conduct.

But I hope this answers your question, rareboy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top