I think there are very few men who are truly heterosexual.

[Telstra]

Yay straight men are posting and thats cool.

I don't mind touching nice women. Their skin are so soft ...

 

[AngelFromAbove]

Being straight myself just like all my friends,

First, I think that it's laughable that you have to reinforce that you're straight in so many of your posts.

I can guarantee you that we are 100% straight.

You cannot guarantee anything, including people's sexual orientations, because you would have to know what people are thinking all day, every day. All you can do is accept what they tell you, but humans are prone lie, deny, avoid, dissemble, and distort the truth on any concept imagineable including their orientations.

I must say that the very effiminate ones are very annoying to me though. I'm fairly those guys are 100% gay, so why can't there be 100% straight men?

Have you ever thought that you annoy them? Or that they may not think so highly of you for whatever reason(s)? Again, for you to be fairly certain that they are 100% gay, you would have to be a telepath and I am fairly certain you are not one. In addition, one's conformity to established, or not clearly established, gender roles has nothing to do with the degree of bisexuality one can or cannot have.

Bisexuality means that you're attracted to both sexes physically and emotionally.

It's nice to know that you're creating your own definitions. Anyway, it's generally agreed in the social sciences that bisexuality involves the ability to have sexual or emotional attraction to both sexes.

While a few guys might get curious (usually out of a lack of women, no, it's not easy to get laid as a straight guy), they never ''crave'' a man, ever. We do however crave men and stare at their asses, tits, etc. Just like gays must crave men.

If a man is going to be curious about same-sex behavior, he is going to be curious about it, regardless. The lack of women is a poor justification.

Lack of women: The average Joe who's a bit socially awkward, out of shape, making 30k a year and not exactly good looking will NEVER get laid with women. I know this might be a concept many of you are not familiar with, but it's much harder to get a woman in bed than to get a man in bed. Therefore, he might turn to men to relieve those sexual frustrations (fapping might get old).

That's why prostitutes exist. When a man cannot get laid with a woman, he pays for one. While a man might turn to another man, it's highly unlikely as the average man, with the average personality type, is far too concerned with others' opinions of him to engage in a behavior that is taboo such as same-sex lovin'. Anyway, most men can find a woman to have sex with them; it's not as painstakingly difficult as you make it seem.

Anal stimulation: Believe it or not, there AREN'T many women who own a strapon in their closet and are really into saying hi, fucking a guy, and saying bye. Shocking isn't it? So a lot of straight might turn to men for that reason aswell.

I'm like McDonald's...I'm lovin' it. By "it", I mean your absurd theories. There are ways for men to stimulate their anuses without the involvement of another male. You're also assuming that there are a lot of straight men who want to simulate copulation, which is not the case. Again, there are plenty of women who will oblige a man with anal stimulation. It's not that difficult for a woman to go and buy a strap-on, if it is not stored away in her closet.

Simple curiosity: While I've never played with a dick, I can imagine the experience being much different than playing with a vagina. The simple fact that it's something ''new'' might be exciting for some guys.

A different experience is one concept. Its being exciting is another concept. If the thought of touching another male's penis is exciting, then you're not straight.

 

[Curiosity69]

I think everyone in the world is most likely bisexual, there's no doubt about it.

I disagree with men being able to keep up with other men in sex better than women. I think you may have had sex with the wrong women if you think that. The women I've known have been very horny, go all day, pleasure themselves and their man equally type of people.

 

[Gatorguy]

I think the vast majority of men are heterosexual, depending on how you define that.

Just as I can believe many people in here who say they are homosexual, I can believe those in other situations who say they are straight.

 

[texan_slant]

I just read the question, in the subject line, and didn't bother with reading any of the other posts, but such is the downfall of using another label on sexuality. I think that the subject line is prob being misinterpreted or miscommunicated based on the use of another label.

Here is my take on things -

Though the "norm" is being hetero, there are prob more men in the closet than we assume, or lead a life that is contrary to who they really are.

Very few men are as straight as the might seem, or if the right door is open, could prob hop the fence, or stick with experimentation. There are a lot who would experiment though still identify as straight because they typically have, or are in, relationships with the opposit sex. That is where they get their emotional love.

Sexuality 'is what it is", and to me, goes to a broader spectrum than the emotional-love relationship. I try not to put a label on a straight guy getting a blow job cuz at the end of the day - he's basically just a dude.

 

[KatTheGreat]

There ARE people who are exclusively straight or gay. And there ARE bisexuals.

Short, straight to the point, and well said.

I would just add that some people are too obsessed with definitions of sexual orientation. I agree that with the soiciety being more open-minded, there are more people who declare themselves as bi, but for me that doesn't mean that everyone has a bit of bisexual in them. I believe there are 100% homosexual and 100% straight people, and we should not assume there are bi tendencies in and everyone of us. Even if you take a look at bisexuality, there are so many different preferences among bisexual people (and I think there are very few truly bisexual people, i.e. people who could really be in a relationship with both sexes).

For years I have lived and worked on the African continent, where in some countries being a gay guy is still a huge issue. And in many of these countries I have visited their clubs that are very underground. So even in those countries, where homosexuality may mean death, there are 100% gay guys (they may be married because of the tradition or for not being stigmatized, but I heard lots of complaints from them that they cannot get it up with their wives, but because in lots of African cultures having children is one of the most important things in the life of a man, lots of them use tricks to inseminate a woman; I will not go to details here).

I also hate statistics, especially when it comes to human sexuality. But I guess everyone has a right to their opinion.

 

[asu1117]

I think there are plenty of men who are truly heterosexual, just like there are plenty of men that are truly homosexual.


I would be willing to be that there are more bisexual people out there than we realize, because of societal norms and the like.

 

[jmadaf]

Are there really any men out there who truth be told are purely heterosexual? After 10 years of having man sex on the side, I'm convinced they are few and far between. I still love women in every way, and appreciate great tits, wet pussy, enjoy looking at them and fucking them. But I have been with very few women who can match the sexual intensity of the average guy. Most women just can't keep up with us sexually. I am so in my element when I'm with a guy sexually, and believe that most guys would feel the same way if they could get past their inhibitions. Let's face it guys... we are put together sexually different than women, and most of us are looking to get laid as much as possible. There are millions of horny, sexually frustrated "heteros" out there tonight who are taking matters into their own hands because the wife, the girl friend (or the lack there of) is happy with once or twice a week.... maybe even less. If they could get past the guilt and inhibitions about man to man sex, we could make a believer out of them.

I believe your right Ironman, just men who haven't tried sucking cock yet. I've sucked alot of so-called st-men, and I think it's because alot of women don't suck good, or hardly at all for thier man.

 

[AsianDream]

Maybe you're indulging in wishful thinking. Then again, because I find the image of a "wet pussy"completely revolting I think there are plenty of us 100 per centers out there.

Don't bet on it - even guys that thought ourselves "pure 100% gay" can change - given the right circumstances.

 

[mark08]

First, I think that it's laughable that you have to reinforce that you're straight in so many of your posts.



You cannot guarantee anything, including people's sexual orientations, because you would have to know what people are thinking all day, every day. All you can do is accept what they tell you, but humans are prone lie, deny, avoid, dissemble, and distort the truth on any concept imagineable including their orientations.



Have you ever thought that you annoy them? Or that they may not think so highly of you for whatever reason(s)? Again, for you to be fairly certain that they are 100% gay, you would have to be a telepath and I am fairly certain you are not one. In addition, one's conformity to established, or not clearly established, gender roles has nothing to do with the degree of bisexuality one can or cannot have.



It's nice to know that you're creating your own definitions. Anyway, it's generally agreed in the social sciences that bisexuality involves the ability to have sexual or emotional attraction to both sexes.



If a man is going to be curious about same-sex behavior, he is going to be curious about it, regardless. The lack of women is a poor justification.



That's why prostitutes exist. When a man cannot get laid with a woman, he pays for one. While a man might turn to another man, it's highly unlikely as the average man, with the average personality type, is far too concerned with others' opinions of him to engage in a behavior that is taboo such as same-sex lovin'. Anyway, most men can find a woman to have sex with them; it's not as painstakingly difficult as you make it seem.



I'm like McDonald's...I'm lovin' it. By "it", I mean your absurd theories. There are ways for men to stimulate their anuses without the involvement of another male. You're also assuming that there are a lot of straight men who want to simulate copulation, which is not the case. Again, there are plenty of women who will oblige a man with anal stimulation. It's not that difficult for a woman to go and buy a strap-on, if it is not stored away in her closet.



A different experience is one concept. Its being exciting is another concept. If the thought of touching another male's penis is exciting, then you're not straight.

Man, that is some hardcore self-delusion / wishful thinking my man, but whatever helps you sleep at night.

 

[AngelFromAbove]

Man, that is some hardcore self-delusion / wishful thinking my man, but whatever helps you sleep at night.

Which is exactly why you were unable to address my "hardcore self-delusion". I'm surprised you didn't remind everyone you were straight with this post.

 

[Curiosity69]

As far as the "very few men that are heterosexual argument"

It may well be true. I've found out in more recent years it is becoming more acceptable for guys to experiment and have others see it as ok.

However, this also brings up the argument, there are probably very few 100% homosexual people out there. It seems to me like a lot of gay men like to bully men into thinking they are definitely bisexual, claiming that no one can resist a cock, but at the same time they claim they are 100% gay, having never experimented or gotten with a girl. I'd say 70% of gay men out there are actually bisexual. Instead of bullying straight guys into trying out cock, eat your own words and try something out with a girl, or just shut up all together.

Most people are probably bisexual in the end.

 

[MyReply]

Sounds like a bunch of 'wishful thinking' to me.

 

[clicker]

I have mixed feelings about the statistics. Anything involving humans will never be entirely pure--meaning I doubt we'll see pure and unadulterated representations in the statistics. Maybe someday, far in the future, as we continue to hone our God-like qualities and detach from fear and insecurity.

Sorry guys, I really talk and think like this... I mean no offense. It's like they say: Take what you want, leave the rest.

At any rate, I feel that heterosexuality and bisexuality are misrepresented in the statistics. I think they are reversed. From my perspective, bisexuality is the norm, meaning the most prevalent. I think that heterosexual behavior can be learned--as can homosexual--particularly for a group that is, shall we say, "versatile." I just feel like there's a general, tacit, and omnipresent guidance toward heterosexual behavior within society, and so it tends to be practiced, to subsequently manifest in any polls.

I agree with the bell curve observation.

Thoughts?

Wow, I agree, Yves, very eloquently written. Excellent.

 

[jizzinmypants]

A man can have sex with another man, but have no physical attraction to men. Would he still be bisexual?

A man can think another man is attractive and admire him, but not have any kind of sexual impulses toward anther man. Would he still be bisexual?

First off, the word bisexual is a little to broad to have an accurate discussion on. Second, obviously most people on this forum would like to believe that very few men are fully heterosexual because that would justify same sex relations but thats problematic though because there is no accurate evidence to support that and that goes against biology, where only a man and a woman can procreate. Heterosexual sex is essential and necessary where as homosexual sex is not.

 

[mbamike]

For your consideration:

So you think you’re straight? That puts you in the majority! As many as 90% of men and women in the USA consider themselves heterosexual.

But you might be surprised how many straight people have fantasies, desires, romantic feelings, and sexual experiences with members of the same sex. In fact, half of people who have had a homosexual experience nevertheless consider themselves straight. In some parts of the world, as many as half of men have had sex with another man. And rates of bisexuality among young women in the US are soaring.

Many straight men and women are probably better classified as one of the following:

heteroflexible supersexual ambisexual flexamorous versatile macho

In fact, of the more than 8,000 people who have taken the Flexuality Test, about half of those who identified themselves as straight turned out to be heteroflexible, nearly one quarter turned out to be ambisexual, while less than 1 in 5 were actually straight.

SOURCE: Flexuality by John W. Hick, MD

 

[bankside]

A man can have sex with another man, but have no physical attraction to men. Would he still be bisexual?

Yes. A man can have sex with men or women and not really be attracted to either men or women. It doesn't seem very well adjusted, but you don't have to be well-adjusted to have a sex life.

A man can think another man is attractive and admire him, but not have any kind of sexual impulses toward anther man. Would he still be bisexual?

No. It's bisexuality, not bifriendliness. It's specifically about sex, not someone's attractiveness, or how you click as friends, or how admirable the person is. I know a friend of mine has great boobs, but I'm never going to want to motorboat them like another friend of mine, S. So you could maybe call me bi-aesthetic because I can tell they're great boobs. But I'm not bi-sexual because I don't want to "tittyfuck" them.

First off, the word bisexual is a little to broad to have an accurate discussion on. Second, obviously most people on this forum would like to believe that very few men are fully heterosexual because that would justify same sex relations but thats problematic though because there is no accurate evidence to support that and that goes against biology, where only a man and a woman can procreate. Heterosexual sex is essential and necessary where as homosexual sex is not.

I think actually quite a few men are fully heterosexual. Often people argue whether the world is 5% gay or 10% gay. I don't know. But I do know the world is not 90% straight or 95% straight.

As far as sexuality being biologically necessary, I think you are mistaken. Our species is not successful because any two humans mate efficiently. Our species is successful because tribes and clans of people thrive and overcome common problems.

When it comes to the traits that help us survive, and help us make the evolutionary cut, that changes the equation dramatically. We're necessary for the success of the species, and communities with gay people in them need them to get ahead. That's what our biology shows..

 

[mrbeebs]

find out the amount of gay porn there is vs straight porn on the internet..

then find a statistic showing the percentage of "gay/bi" people.

compare the two, I'm sure the gay porn percentage will be much, much higher.


I'm currently trying to find the stats on this.. this is just my hypothesis.

 

[hellcatedy]

Maybe you're indulging in wishful thinking. Then again, because I find the image of a "wet pussy"completely revolting I think there are plenty of us 100 per centers out there.

Yeah, I agree with you in that a wet vagina does not interest me in the least. I do enjoy watching a straight porn but only for the hot men doing hot acts that I don't dream about.

 

[AsianDream]

As far as sexuality being biologically necessary, I think you are mistaken. Our species is not successful because any two humans mate efficiently. Our species is successful because tribes and clans of people thrive and overcome common problems.

When it comes to the traits that help us survive, and help us make the evolutionary cut, that changes the equation dramatically. We're necessary for the success of the species, and communities with gay people in them need them to get ahead. That's what our biology shows..

An interesting evolutionary idea - all people have a strong attraction to each other - which makes us much better at co-operating as groups.

Sort of shows up in many ancient civilisations (Greek / Roman etc) where the culture was essentially bi-sexual.