The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Intellectual crimes

belamyi said:
Wouldn't that be considered today "hate crimes"..:
Click to expand...
According to your link, Brasillach was executed for advocating collaborationism [cooperation with the enemy against one's country of citizenship in wartime], denunciation, and incitement to murder.
 
^ Yep, but since he didn't actually do any dirty work to filth his hands, before the age of fake news, hate crimes and democracy in danger people would think of those activities as mere "intellectual" work, verbal incitement... Because it was him against mass murder committed by others, not masterminding it all, or directly inciting to one particular crime.

So who is right, people during the postwar decades until, say, the 2000s, or people talking of "hate crimes" today?
 
I think it would be possible to argue that Hitler didn't personally do any dirty work and was only guilty of verbal incitement.
 
unloadonme said:
I think it would be possible to argue that Hitler didn't personally do any dirty work and was only guilty of verbal incitement.
Click to expand...
Exactly: so why would Brasillach be considered a mere bad-mouthed, ill-willing "intellectual"?

Twenty years ago, even in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, mainstream public opinion would not conceive any of that ever posing any real threat to society, 'civilization', let alone be a crime... again, even if they more or less could accept the notion of a criminal, 'clean-handed' mastermind of a terrorist attack.
What about today?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top