T-Rexx
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Posts
- 6,026
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Google executives say they have suspected for some time now that Microsoft's Bing search engine is actually using Google to look up information. Bing then returns the Google results to the searcher under the Bing name.
To catch Microsoft in the act, Google set up a few "honeypots." They invented random words like "mbzrxpgjys" and "indoswiftjobinproduction" and "hiybbprqag." They first confirmed that searching for these terms on Google returned no results whatsoever. Google then internally linked the made-up words with some unrelated thing. For example, "mbzrxpgjys" was linked to Research in Motion's web site, "indoswiftjobinproduction" was linked to the Food Network's Sandra Lee Recipes, and "hiybbprqag" was linked to "The Wiltern seating chart." After Google made the internal links, then searching Google for "mbzrxpgjys" would return Research in Motion's web site and nothing else, since the random word was linked by Google only to RIM and nothing else.
Then, Google employees searched for their made-up words on Bing. Look what happened:
When questioned about this by ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley, Microsoft issued a bizarre statement:
When asked by Mary Jo what that meant, Microsoft clarified:
However, Microsoft has offered no explanation as to how their search engine is copying random links internal and unique to Google.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-we-do-not-copy-googles-results/8557?tag=nl.e589
To catch Microsoft in the act, Google set up a few "honeypots." They invented random words like "mbzrxpgjys" and "indoswiftjobinproduction" and "hiybbprqag." They first confirmed that searching for these terms on Google returned no results whatsoever. Google then internally linked the made-up words with some unrelated thing. For example, "mbzrxpgjys" was linked to Research in Motion's web site, "indoswiftjobinproduction" was linked to the Food Network's Sandra Lee Recipes, and "hiybbprqag" was linked to "The Wiltern seating chart." After Google made the internal links, then searching Google for "mbzrxpgjys" would return Research in Motion's web site and nothing else, since the random word was linked by Google only to RIM and nothing else.
Then, Google employees searched for their made-up words on Bing. Look what happened:
When questioned about this by ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley, Microsoft issued a bizarre statement:
“We use multiple signals and approaches in ranking search results. The overarching goal is to do a better job determining the intent of the search so we can provide the most relevant answer to a given query. Opt-in programs like the toolbar help us with clickstream data, one of many input signals we and other search engines use to help rank sites,” said Stefan Weitz, Director, Bing.
When asked by Mary Jo what that meant, Microsoft clarified:
“We do not copy Google’s results.”
However, Microsoft has offered no explanation as to how their search engine is copying random links internal and unique to Google.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-we-do-not-copy-googles-results/8557?tag=nl.e589


















