JakeBequette
Pickles
In my mind, it's the RIGHT to get married, not the greatness of marriage.
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
In my mind, it's the RIGHT to get married, not the greatness of marriage.
I quite agreed with you Surfboy and for a long time I, also hoped for some other name for gay unions. But for the reasons you quote, religion, tradition, and what gays see as a union of two people, I started saying, "why should gays not have what gays regard as a marriage" and you know T'is but a word, yet if it means so much to gay people who regard their union as a marriage, I say, bring on the rice, confetti and marriage license. Just sentimental I guess".Im all for civil unions and gay couples getting the rights of a traditional marriage through an alternative name/method. Equal rights is the key here, not what you call it.
But honestly, in my heart, believe the word "marriage" should be left for a man and a woman. Theres just too much involved, religion, tradition, etc for gay couples to try and bend the definition.
-
I was married to a woman I loved very much and who is now deceased. I'm also well aware of the pros and cons associated with being married versus being single and/or gay! As many of you are aware, I'm now very much in love and in a committed gay relationship. I also believe I should have every right to marry Eric as I did my wife some 17 years ago. I have always made it clear that I support gay marriage and believe it is one aspect that can truly give us equality in a very homophobic society. I personally take issue with your statement Dan that many gays are not capable of sustaining a stable relationship, in the first place! Even if it was true, shouldn't it still be our choice to make and not some lopsided bureaucracy that views us more as freaks than equals. Supposedly half of all heterosexual marriages end in divorce, because of financial woes, infidelity, abuse, and many other reasons that can be directly related to instability in general. Couldn’t you also make the argument that many heterosexuals are not capable of sustaining a stable relationship as well? So, what’s the difference? It really all comes down to a matter of maturity on both sides, whether you’re straight or gay! Many marriages I have known in my lifetime usually result in unhappy relations anyway, even after several years of marriage, doesn't matter whether their gay or straight.
In his judicious exposition of the arguments for gay marriage, Bruce Bawer, who is a gay American literary critic and writer, states:
One can approve or disapprove of somebody's actions or
opinions, beliefs; but it is meaningless to speak of approving
or disapproving of another's innate characteristics. To
say that someone approves or disapproves of somebody's
homosexuality is like saying that one approves or disapproves
of somebody's baldness or tallness.
Why should the law view it any differently?
For me, this is the wrong question!!! Shouldn’t you be asking is marriage and only marriage everything it’s cracked up to be! I also recognize that marriage isn’t for everyone either! However, it should be a decision that’s freely made between two consenting adults without the bias of a bureaucratic majority who thinks they have a monopoly on what’s true or moral in our society.
Anyway, just my opinion!
Still love ya' Sixthson!!!![]()
I was married to a woman I loved very much and who is now deceased. I'm also well aware of the pros and cons associated with being married versus being single and/or gay! As many of you are aware, I'm now very much in love and in a committed gay relationship. I also believe I should have every right to marry Eric as I did my wife some 17 years ago. I have always made it clear that I support gay marriage and believe it is one aspect that can truly give us equality in a very homophobic society. I personally take issue with your statement Dan that many gays are not capable of sustaining a stable relationship, in the first place! Even if it was true, shouldn't it still be our choice to make and not some lopsided bureaucracy that views us more as freaks than equals. Supposedly half of all heterosexual marriages end in divorce, because of financial woes, infidelity, abuse, and many other reasons that can be directly related to instability in general. Couldn’t you also make the argument that many heterosexuals are not capable of sustaining a stable relationship as well? So, what’s the difference? It really all comes down to a matter of maturity on both sides, whether you’re straight or gay! Many marriages I have known in my lifetime usually result in unhappy relations anyway, even after several years of marriage, doesn't matter whether their gay or straight.
In his judicious exposition of the arguments for gay marriage, Bruce Bawer, who is a gay American literary critic and writer, states:
One can approve or disapprove of somebody's actions or
opinions, beliefs; but it is meaningless to speak of approving
or disapproving of another's innate characteristics. To
say that someone approves or disapproves of somebody's
homosexuality is like saying that one approves or disapproves
of somebody's baldness or tallness.
Why should the law view it any differently?
For me, this is the wrong question!!! Shouldn’t you be asking is marriage and only marriage everything it’s cracked up to be! I also recognize that marriage isn’t for everyone either! However, it should be a decision that’s freely made between two consenting adults without the bias of a bureaucratic majority who thinks they have a monopoly on what’s true or moral in our society.
Anyway, just my opinion!
Still love ya' Sixthson!!!![]()
Being in a commited relationship, whatever it's called, means work from both parties involved. There are days of great joy and excitement and days of grand dissapointment and sorrow. There are times of boredom and anxiety.Being married or being a LTR is OVERRATED. People have to realize that just because you are in a marriage/LTR doesn't necessarily mean you will be happy. Alot of people who are married wish they were single (and vice-versa, but mostly the other way around)
I think alot of people have a "fairy-tale view" of marriage and Lube's thread is a great one and has brought up a lot of valid points. This thread has nothing to do with straight or gay, rather it is about thinking about all sides of relationships/marriage regardless of sexuality.
Its hard for gays to win the argument for same sex marriage because most of us argue for marriage for the financial benefits....and there is more to a marriage than that.
Marriage is an "institution" that is failing. Why are we so eager to be apart of that? (Outside of obvious reasons)![]()
Being in a commited relationship, whatever it's called, means work from both parties involved. There are days of great joy and excitement and days of grand dissapointment and sorrow. There are times of boredom and anxiety.
It's sharing your life and all it entails with someone who does the same back.
It's fulfilling and comforting and frustrating and confounding. It's the same things expierienced as a single person but now you get to go through it as two working together as one.
Putting aside the legal ramifications and stick to the emotional side for a bit. My partner and I have been together almost 11 years now, living together for almost 10. We have been through everything any other person regardless of sexual identity, can go through. Marriages of our children, births of grand children, deaths of parents and former spouses, financial windfall and famine, job promotions and losses, name it and we've probably gone through it...together.
Are we "happy" all the time? I'd be lieing if I said yes but at the same time tell me who is? We are content, we have companionship and still have passion.
On the legal side, our house is in both names as is one vehicle out of three. Our checking, savings and investment accounts are in both names. Utilities are also listed jointly as are insurance pollicies.
We are pretty much as "married" as we are going to be in the state of New Hampshire.
The one thing I have left out here so far is forgivness! One must be willing to forgive and not be rigid. One must be responsible to the other and their feelings. If I said we didn't lust after others, again I'd be lieing. We're human of we do. We come home to each other every night and make love when ever we want or need to. In nearly 11 years of partnership niether has ever denied the other the pleasure of our passion.
Is commitment dead? Not from where I sit. Should "marriage" be tossed because the wrong people commit to each other? No, I don't think so. They should learn from their mistakes , grow from them and move on.
Would I like to have an acual marriage? Yes, I think I would. I think we deserve it.
Should "marriage" be tossed because the wrong people commit to each other? No, I don't think so. They should learn from their mistakes , grow from them and move on.
What I mean is that some choose the wrong person to be with. FOr whatever reason.But what do you mean by the statement in the above quote that is bolded...
If we were all straight, the question wouldn't even be asked. How many straight people think about that stuff when they consider getting married?
