The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

L.H.O.O.Q. (The Mona Lisa has a hot ass)

Araucaria

JUB 10k Club
Joined
Sep 9, 2015
Posts
24,390
Reaction score
3,137
Points
113
Location
West Palm Beach area
Marcel_Duchamp,_1919,_L.H.O.O.Q.jpg

The French artist Marcel Duchamp created L.H.O.O.Q. in 1919, defacing a cheap postcard reproduction of the Mona Lisa by giving her a mustache. Those postcards apparently were ubiquitous in France at that time. The letters "L.H.O.O.Q." when pronounced in French, sound like "Elle a chaud au cul", which translates roughly into "she has a hot ass," a pun that every French schoolboy undoubtedly knew. I'm sure Duchamp took a perverse pleasure in mocking a piece of art which has been widely overused.

 
At least he didn't burn her to a crisp like Miles Bron.

While the original piece may be sacred, I've never considered the image to be. It's become ubiquitous as a McDonald's sign. Give her a nice pearl necklace. A few stray pubes on her lip might be a nice touch.
 
At least he didn't burn her to a crisp like Miles Bron.

While the original piece may be sacred, I've never considered the image to be. It's become ubiquitous as a McDonald's sign. Give her a nice pearl necklace. A few stray pubes on her lip might be a nice touch.

I was not aware of Miles Bron or Glass Onion. It seems there is some debate over whether the burning of the Mona Lisa in the movie would have revealed the portrait to be fake, and if so, if it being fake was intentional. Apparently the burning revealed the painting to have been on canvas made of cotton or hemp, but da Vinci used a plank of poplar wood. Was Glass Onion intending to show that Miles Bron bought a fake because he did not realize that, something an art connoisseur of the caliber he purported to be would have be able to spot?

 
^ As I remember, he was sort of "renting" it and it's destruction was meant to humiliate him and make him somewhat of a pariah. Whether or not the painting's authenticity was ever in question I cannot say, I was too busy stepping over all the plot holes.
 
Wouldn't that be something more like "her ass is in heat"?
 
^ As I remember, he was sort of "renting" it and it's destruction was meant to humiliate him and make him somewhat of a pariah. Whether or not the painting's authenticity was ever in question I cannot say, I was too busy stepping over all the plot holes.
According to Hollywood naivety for the gulping mass, it was supposed to be the real thing, but even in a parallel Hollywood universe that could have never ever been the case: they won't even dare to bring it to the restoration room where it belongs, go figure if the French would agree to sent it to a stupid American new rich bumpkin.
 
At least he didn't burn her to a crisp like Miles Bron.
All for script tension purposes: they had to finish off the movie with a literal firework act, because they could not find anything cleverer, and you can not find climax in an American blockbusters if you do not get off with the right amount of firecracking anyway.
 
According to Hollywood naivety for the gulping mass, it was supposed to be the real thing, but even in a parallel Hollywood universe that could have never ever been the case: they won't even dare to bring it to the restoration room where it belongs, go figure if the French would agree to sent it to a stupid American new rich bumpkin.
Remind me never to sit through a film with you.

All for script tension purposes: they had to finish off the movie with a literal firework act, because they could not find anything cleverer, and you can not find climax in an American blockbusters if you do not get off with the right amount of firecracking anyway.
Alright, maybe a dopey action film.
 
Alright, maybe a dopey action film.
But funny as hell precisely because so silly :mrgreen:

Although I prefer the Knives one... and hoping the third installment won't keep sinking the minifranchise.
 
Betting and trusting are two different things.
 
Back
Top