The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Medicated Stents May Not Be Safe

snapcat

Clowns Rule!
JUB Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
18,134
Reaction score
323
Points
0
Location
Lexington
Website
hometown.aol.com
This is stunning news to all those people, including myself, that have had medicated stents implanted following a heart attack. Four million Americans - including me - are walking around with these devices in their body.

I have to admit that I'm more than a little worried. The prospect of having to take Plavix for the rest of my life, because of the medicated stent, is also crushing. Without insurance, it costs me about $150 for a month's supply. The generic costs just under $100!

Here's a link to the article from The Money Times ...


...
FDA to probe Safety of Medicated Stents



Drug-coated stents have provided relief to millions of chest pain and heart attack sufferers around the world but now doctors think these stents may raise the risk of life-threatening blood clots months and even years later unless people stay on Plavix, placing their long-term safety in doubts

A drug-coated or medicated stent is a very small, expandable mesh-like metal cylinder, coated with medicine that decreases scar formation on the stent, and fits over an uninflated angioplasty balloon. These stents are used to open up a coronary (heart) blood vessel that is narrowed or blocked by plaque build-up (atherosclerosis), and to maintain that opening by permanently placing a metal stent within the heart artery. These metal stents help restore normal blood flow to the heart muscle.

Now the drug-coated stents therapy is facing questions from heart experts who are doubtful about the device’s long-term safety. They say it is possible that if a patient does not stay on Plavix, an anti-clotting drug, his chances of developing dangerous blood clots are significantly raised.
In a Swiss study, it was found that patients with medicated stents had double the risk of heart problems after stopping Plavix than those with older, bare-metal stents, and that the medicated stents carry a higher risk of potentially fatal blood clots than plain metal stents.

But, the problem is that nobody knows how safe the long-term taking of Plavix as the $4-a-day anti-clotting drug’s long-term safety in stent patients has not been yet established.

But doctors are still worried these stents may raise the risk of potential life-threatening blood clots months and even years later unless their patients remain on Plavix. At the same time, they are ambiguous what therapy should be used on them who are developing new blockages.

Most of them, returning to the old metal stents, and some are fundamentally rethinking when to use stents at all and are considering alternatives like bypass surgery or use just drugs. However, thousands of people are being urged to take the Plavix until more is known.

Some doctors say the raised risk is not significant as only about five clots are found in every 1,000 drug-coated stent patients, and are concerned overreaction to the risk could sabotage patients' long term options.

A Food and Drug Administration panel will meet to discuss the safety of heart stents on Thursday and Friday. The panel will seek to recommend a standard definition for late stent thrombosis, and settle many other issues, like when the stents should be used, what causes the clots, and whether the condition is common to all medicated stent brands.

This is not the first time the medicated stents are facing criticism, even three years ago the US FDA issued a warning after receiving more than 290 reports of blood clots in patients using Cypher drug coated devices by Johnson & Johnson's Cordis Corp. with more than 60 deaths associated with them.

Dr. Robert Califf of Duke University, who worked on one study to be presented to the FDA, said, "It's such a huge public health issue with so many people involved."

Of approximately sixty lakh patients worldwide, estimated 4 million Americans are walking around with the drug stents implanted inside their bodies, while about 1.5 lakh patients using them in India since June 2002.

As per the estimates of the Interventional Council of India, 60% of the 65,000 stents implanted in the country last year were drug-coated.

The market of medicated stents is estimated at more than $5 billion a year. These drug coated stents cost around three times as much as old, bare-metal devices.
 
I'll be interested to see where this goes, as stenting was something that I was interested in doing eventually. :eek:
 
Almost 2 years ago I had a massive heart attack. They didn't put a stent in because, "Quite frankly, we didn't expect you to live through the weekend." is what my cardiologist told me. They needed to get me on a heart pump to relieve the pressure on my heart ASAP (my heart attack "blew out" the bottom third of my heart) so they didn't take the time to do one. I had heard of this and it may be a blessing in disguise that they didn't do the stent.
 
:mad: I have 3 medicated stents now this just gives me something else to worry about
 
It will be interesting to watch this. And also, I'd be curious if they compared the use of plavix with that of aspirin. As in other populations, the efficacy is about the same. And aspirin is a heck of a lot cheaper than plavix.
 
It will be interesting to watch this. And also, I'd be curious if they compared the use of plavix with that of aspirin. As in other populations, the efficacy is about the same. And aspirin is a heck of a lot cheaper than plavix.

A good point. Anything that I was able to find with a (fast/non-thorough) search really only studied the problems when anticoagulant therapy in general was discontinued, not Plavix specifically.

Edit: Here's a more detailed article from Forbes.
 
It will be interesting to watch this. And also, I'd be curious if they compared the use of plavix with that of aspirin. As in other populations, the efficacy is about the same. And aspirin is a heck of a lot cheaper than plavix.

I'm not ready to condemn them yet. The article/data might suggest we should switch back to bare stents, but that might just make the problem worse by allowing scar tissue to form, negating the point of a stent in the first place.

As an engineer, the first thing I'd be inclined to do is put in a filter downstream of the stent, but I realize that's easier said than done. "Filters" do exist though, in crude form (the design is straight out of the oil fields, but works amazingly well). But it could be an option.
 
"Filters" do exist though, in crude form (the design is straight out of the oil fields, but works amazingly well). But it could be an option.

True, but the filters are really used in the large inferior vena cava and actually aren't as effective as first thought. Stents on the other hand are used in the MUCH smaller coronary vessels. I don't know how feasible it would be to put a filter in there... much less how effective.
 
I would think their next step would be to alter the coating on the stent to make it less of a coagulant surface (i.e. make it appear like intact endothelium to the body). Assuming they want to try and design a better stent (someone must want to...) ;)
 
That's a little over $3.25 a day. Granted I live in an expensive country, but that doesn't seem that expensive to me.
 
That's a little over $3.25 a day. Granted I live in an expensive country, but that doesn't seem that expensive to me.

Well, odds are you have more money than I do. With the situation I am in, that's a lot of money. And keep in mind that I take 5 prescription meds. I was on 6 but had to drop one because I couldn't afford it.
 
Odd are that the same meds would cost more as well over here. As an example, a Big Mac by itself would cost me almost $6, so there are luxuries that I could cut out of my daily life to prioritize my health... but when you start adding more meds to the equation... I can see where it would strain you.
 
Back
Top