Homoaffectional
1,000th post? Customize!!
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2005
- Posts
- 1,657
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
But you're obviously trying quite hard to instigate an argument, so I'll end it there.![]()
Nope, not at all in fact, Mr. "obvious". But as far as you ending it, as long as we're clear about the "supporting anything remotely connected to homo'sexu'ality" thing, which can easily elicit the "anything in the world" phenomenon, "genius" or not (which is where this whole line of debate came from in the first place, if you had been keeping track of your own statements, and didn't think that backpeddling would serve as some kind of retcon). There are so many appearances of GLBTs in television and movies both major and minor, some brilliant, some offensive, and some mediocre so when you say that kind of thing, you imply that they all have GLAAD's "support". There are so many media images and appearances that GLAAD doesn't even bother to make any statment about (and as I've said, that I feel at times they should and don't) period, let alone "supports"...
... so, yes, let's end it there with that understanding in mind, so I don't trip your paranoid sensibilities, picking up my tendency to try "quite hard to instigate an argument".









