Racial preference poll with better options

[G-Lexington]

If it's still a poll about "racial preferences", it won't have better choices.

Lex

 

[PabloZed]

Absolutely idiotic. JUB is intent on becoming a forum for the intellectually and socially inadequate.

 

[youngnihilist]

It's not any better than the last poll. if you were truly to do a poll you'd have to call a random sample of 900 or so gay men, which is virtually impossible.

at the very least you should include more race options like arab, persian, east indian, islander, MIXED (of which there could be many mixtures)

 

[fabulouslyghetto]

at the very least you should include more race options like arab, persian, east indian, islander, MIXED (of which there could be many mixtures)

Are those even considered races? I'd consider them more nationalities than race.

 

[fabulouslyghetto]

^How can you merge a thread with two different polls? This is nowhere near the first topic to be repetitive, though other topics seem to get a golden pass whereas this one is treated like a nuclear missle.

I agree with Lex that it is pointless as long as we're still dividing people into archaic categories. Wouldn't nationality be (as divisive but) more accurate?

Biracial people still haven't been accounted for. Somehow some people have the impression that all people are one "race" or another.

 

[Hot Hector]

Aren't people being too sensitive over this? Just try voting out of fun, really, not worrying about a perfect racial definition.

I'm white and vote asian, know why? Because guys with asian-looking traces turn me on like hell. Those wonderful eyes, hair color, the list goes on.

It doesn't mean I wouldn't date an asian/white mixed guy, or a black guy, or that I have prejudice with any other race/look/stereotype.

It's simply about picking what turns you on the most, isn't it? That's pretty simple and objective.

 

[BabiGayPimp]

This is just all too much confusement for me. It's like people just 'aint got no kinda identity these days...(heh! heh!).