The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Sam Raimi on "Spider-man 4"

Paxton

Out of order
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
3,342
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Buenos Aires
"Right now, a writer is being sought to write the next installment," Raimi said of the future of Peter Parker, following Marvel's recent separation from original "Spider-Man 4" writer David Koepp, who also wrote the script for the first film. "We're in the very early stages."

When last we spoke with the director of the first three Spidey movies, he mentioned plans to work both the Lizard and the supervillain group the Sinister Six into the next blockbuster flick. Over the last few months, however, Raimi and Marvel have decided to be more receptive of reinvention. "I won't be working on the story," he revealed, insisting he'll adopt a hands-off approach. "It'll be a brand-new writer coming in with a brand-new story — a fresh take on the Spider-Man series."

This "fresh take" might not only include the comic's most obscure supervillains, but also entirely new story lines that diverge from (or even contradict) plot details from the three Tobey Maguire flicks. "We're hearing different versions right now and really enjoying the different stories," Raimi said. "Hopefully, we'll hear one that sounds right for the fourth installment."

Asked if he'll then make the key decision to direct the script or take a step back as solely a producer, Raimi nodded. "Yes, that's right. In this case, it's more in the writer's hands. I'm going to let the writer envision where Peter Parker would go to next."

In the months following the success of "Spider-Man 3" and Topher Grace's breakout baddie, Venom, Marvel revealed plans for a spinoff flick. For the first time, Raimi weighed in on his connection with that flick, remaining consistent with a supposedly less-than-enthusiastic attitude toward the terrifyingly tongued alien. "That's probably for someone else," he grinned.
 
Was Topher Grace and/or Venom really a "breakout character" in Spider-Man 3?

I'm not saying he sucked or anything but I didn't think he was any better or worse than Goblin or Doc Oc in 1 & 2 IMO.

The comic book character is one thing, but is the movie Brock/Venom really deserving of a spin-off? Maybe its just me then...Topher was hot in it though
 
Was Topher Grace and/or Venom really a "breakout character" in Spider-Man 3?

I'm not saying he sucked or anything but I didn't think he was any better or worse than Goblin or Doc Oc in 1 & 2 IMO.

You're not saying it, but I will: VENOM sucked BIG TIME in SPIDER-MAN 3.

Well, to tell you the truth: The whole movie sucked. :grrr:
 
I liked Spiderman 3! More than the other two. And thats saying somethin, cuz i didnt like any of the Spidermans that much.
 
But how will they work it, both Eddie Brock and the majority of the Venom Symbiote were incinerated, and I don't doubt the good docter destroyed the piece he had.

Anyway, how will they have the sinister 6? Aern't Doc Oc and Hobgoblin two of the members? and aren't they dead?
 
Venom didnt work because it was handled by a director who didnt like or wanted the character in part 3 in the beginning, but he grudgingly put him in because the studio heads wanted to put as many bums on seats as possible to get the highest return and since Venom IS a major part of Spiderman folklore, including him in making that happen was a no brainer. The fact that Venom and the symbiot suit were so hyped up in the trailers to get the fans in, yet when you saw it found out they were actually only ever really present in the last 15 or so minutes in the climax, tells you how much the director actually felt about the whole debacle.
Venom will be great character is he is handled by the right people, as in someone who wants the character in the film to begin with and want to use the source material to adapt in in such a way he works well in the film medium as he does in the comics.
Casting a new Brock would be a step in the right direction as I always though Topher was badly miscast in both that role and as his alterego venom. He can act yes, but not the intesity that is required to pull off the dual role of both down troden man and the villain he will become. Another thing they have to do is make sure they recast the whole main roles too, including Peter and MJ if need be. Kirsten dunst is a nice kid, but to me she cannot really act to save herself and as MJ was miscast right from the start, while McGuire was okay in the first film, 2 and 3 showed that he does not have the right amount of screen charisma to carry a film on his own and make the audience WANT to be with him on the journey, which, when you are the central core of the film as is your character, is a major thing to get right.
 
After Spider-Man 3, I don't think I'll ever watch another Spider-Man movie from Raimi.

Which is really saying something. Spider-Man 1 & 2 were in my top 10 fave movies...
 
Am I the only one who really hated Spider-Man 2 but liked the first and third?
 
WHY!!!!!!!!! The third one was so bad. The storyline made no sense and the characters were constructed in such a poor and 1 dimensional way...... let it go. LET IT GO.
 
I keep wanting to be the Fantastic Four movies to be good because I always liked the FF but the screenwriters/directors just aren't helping me out here.
 
Back
Top