The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Star Trek: Into Darkness Teaser

Because of the timeline being changed by Nero, virtually everything held sacred canon to the original Trek is now free to play around with, or ignore. I'm glad they didn't just kill off the villain, and that in the end the essential humanity of the Trek message remained intact, if not shining out clearer than ever. The reversal part could have been a complete cheesefest, but it is basically nitpicking at an otherwise really entertaining film that keeps to the Trek traditions while boldly going towards an appealing re-imagining of its own. Loved how they even snuck in a tribble to help save the day... I can't wait for another entry to hit theaters. Even more, it's about time the franchise get its own television makeover too and return to series form, whether it's from the original series era or later times.
 
So I finally saw it, and watched the first of Abrams Star Trek last night to catch myself up to speed. I really enjoyed the movie, it was easily better than IM3 and the 1st Star Trek reboot. The movie had its flaws like the pointless, maybe not pointless, but obviously he wasn't going to remain dead, and weird revival, but other than that I didn't have any major complaints. The villain was awesome, and Cumberbatch did an incredible job like always, and I'm happy he survived, just so Cumberbatch can maybe be in another Star Trek in the future. How ironic was the fact that the destruction occurred in London. Sherlock destroyed his home and also sort of saw him as an evil version of Sherlock.
 
borg69unimatrix said:
Although a little cheesy, I enjoyed the reversals to the other movie. I was also glad to see Nimoy make a small appearance. I thought the Klingons were cooler then I've ever seen them. I wasn't overly thrilled with the first movie, but if this second one is the direction Trek is going, I can get behind it, happily.

One funny thing I missed that my friend pointed out was that other shuttle they had, had I guess Kirk said they picked t up during the "Mudd incident". :)

There are some points I could nit pick about, but I doubt most care about continuity issues like that as much as do.
Click to expand...


I didnt question the shuttle Jimbo, Spock, Uhura & the Arms team used to seek out the Klingons..I'd expect the Enterprise to have several shuttles that can carry at least 10 Crew members...Come on Man this is America in the Future..We are still the Shit and gotta represent above the other Planets...

I Love Nimoy but he appeared in the 1st one and he Narrated the closing theme in the first one...Wouldnt you like to see Nichelle Nichols come Face to Face with Young Lieutenant Uhura?

I don't wanna see Old Spock in Part 3..I wanna see other legends...
 
I am curious if the actors of the original crew, TNG, Voyager, ... have watched these new Treks and what they think about them.


It will probably never happen, but I've always wanted a Voyager movie too.
 
spoiler alert...im a really harsh critic for star trek films apparently.

saw the movie last night in imax 3d, paid 17.50 for that and was a little let down. it played more like a wannabe superhero movie, the scene where they start talking about dismantling one of the torpedos was pretty lame, i got up at that point for more popcorn, when i came back they were still talking about dismantling one of the torpedoes. the use of the warp core death scene from star trek 2, and using the blonde chick, carol marcus? was completely random, shes a scientist not a weapons expert. the ending scene that reminded me of nemesis with kirk and khan jumping from the enterprise to the enemy ship that had to 'deploy' weapons to destroy the enterprise.

watching the villain negotiate with spock made no sense, it essentially just gave spock an opportunity to play his hand. if khan wanted his people back why didnt he just carry out his threat? the whole movie used old borrowed ideas from previous star trek movies. i cant believe they spent $190 million on this for two outer space fight scenes between two federation vessles that are right above earth, and starfleet is nowhere to be found. at various points in the movie the crew is spelling things out for the audience, and the main theme behind the movie that a starfleet admiral is trying to start a war by killing the enterprise crew is far fetched.
 
I found it enjoyably sleek and exciting. As it's not the kind of movie I expect more from than that, I was satisfied.

Some of the things I thought about...

...The character of Carol was introduced because this is the super-slashiest homosexual Kirk-Loves-Spock script ever. Gazing into each other's eyes, saving one another, making passionate declarations of "friendship." Geez, just get married already. :lol: If Kirk didn't have Carol "on board" and Spock didn't have Uhura, it'd be easy to spot where the real romance lies...

...9/11 imagery. Will it ever end?

...And Dr. McCoy!
Shall we re-name thee Herbert West, Re-Animator?:eek:
 
ya mccoy would never go for that shit: Your dead Jim..... oh wait never mind.
 
zoltanspawn said:
I found it enjoyably sleek and exciting. As it's not the kind of movie I expect more from than that, I was satisfied.

Some of the things I thought about...

...The character of Carol was introduced because this is the super-slashiest homosexual Kirk-Loves-Spock script ever. Gazing into each other's eyes, saving one another, making passionate declarations of "friendship." Geez, just get married already. :lol: If Kirk didn't have Carol "on board" and Spock didn't have Uhura, it'd be easy to spot where the real romance lies...

...9/11 imagery. Will it ever end?

...And Dr. McCoy!
Shall we re-name thee Herbert West, Re-Animator?:eek:
Click to expand...

I also got serious Kirk/Spock vibes, I didn't want to see it, but it was undeniable.
 
layton said:
I also got serious Kirk/Spock vibes, I didn't want to see it, but it was undeniable.
Click to expand...

kirk-spock-bromance.jpg

spirkFTW-1.jpg

ks.jpg


Man... I didn't realize there were so many of these types of pix out there! There's a TON of 'em!!!
;)
 
Honestly, I saw a video interview of Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto and it set my gaydar off (and I'm not even good at spotting gay stuff). All I could think of was Zachary making Chris bend over a few times!
 
PABear said:
Honestly, I saw a video interview of Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto and it set my gaydar off (and I'm not even good at spotting gay stuff). All I could think of was Zachary making Chris bend over a few times!
Click to expand...

post the video! zq is openly gay...the jury is out on chris pine...so fun to watch them in the new star trek.
 
evanrick said:
post the video! zq is openly gay...the jury is out on chris pine...so fun to watch them in the new star trek.
Click to expand...

I can't find the exact video, but this one is interesting as well...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top