Nomenclature
Problem?
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Posts
- 4,407
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 0
Well, if it makes you feel any better, you're my little sex crime, Kennylingus. 
/facetious

/facetious
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Well, if it makes you feel any better, you're my little sex crime, Kennylingus.
/facetious
I am active in trying to smarten up most of the US sex laws on the books. One of the current stories has an 18 year old going to prison and having to register as a sex offender for life when he gets out because he went to a 18+ club, met a girl inside then had a one night stand with her. Some time down the road the guy gets arrested because it turns out is was only 16 and the guy doesn’t live in a state with a grace period.
That's why we have one set of laws for kids in most parts of the world, and another set for adults: One court system scares the kids as punishment (hopefully scaring them straight) and the other brings financial and social punishment in the veins of loss of freedom, rights, access to financial gain, etc. If we live in social orders, then it is our personal responsibility to adhere to behaviours that are contructive, not destructive, inclusive, not exclusive, productive, not counter-productive. Don't we all hear things like do unto others? Most people have a fairly good idea of what is considered wrong and right in their society, and newbies can participate in lessons with locals in most places newbies would ever gain access to. This is well known information.Then what is?
I keep seeing this on issues I keep up on. If one doesn’t know something is illegal or “wrong” how are they to know they shouldn’t or can not do it?
In a recent case in the UK a man who had sex with a 12 yr old girl received just an 18 month suspended sentence because the judge decided he had "reasonable belief" that the girl was over 16. They had met on Facebook, where she claimed to be 16 and about to leave school. Evidence cited in his favour included the fact he bought her an "adult" rail ticket when they went on a date. He pleaded guilty to statutory rape and has to register for 7 years.
THe US is of course rather paronoid about all things sexual, but that's becasue the people vote paranoid law-makers in and tell them how important it is to the people to have religious piousness in their leaders. Sadly in Oz we are following the US like the fuckwits we so often are...
It should be more than an excuse it should be a valid legal defense. He wasn't ignorant he was deceived and so long as he believed what he was being told he should not be punished in any way. She should be placed in a juvenile detention center until she has reached legal adulthood for the protection of both her and any potential victims.
Then what is?
I keep seeing this on issues I keep up on. If one doesn’t know something is illegal or “wrong” how are they to know they shouldn’t or can not do it?
