The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Some things to know about this forum:
    If you're new, please read the Posting Guidelines. Banned content is in "List of Content Never Allowed on JUB".
    The most important thing to know: images of persons under 18 years old are never allowed here. If you cannot verify that the person in the picture is 18 years or older, don't post it.

18 /21? into it?

Fiorino

JUB Addict
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Posts
1,079
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
San Diego
I agree, sometimes when I see these sites I wonder if they truly are legal age, a great place for pedophiles to go.
 
If they look too questionably young, moderators can remove the links/images. I've seen it done in the past. Likewise, if you find it could be questionable, you could as a moderator for their input. To be fair to some people, though, you can still look ridiculously young at 18. At 26, people think I'm 19...
 
Without commentary...

Many 18 yr old guys will look like they're 16 or younger. In fact, many porn vendors will seek these type of guys out.
 
:help:I am growing a little concerned oversomeof the images I see in twinks, young men and jocks. some "twinks look a little boarderline aka young, to me. I am somewhat not comfortable (legal implications) in viewing this forum. I am hot for "jocks" and do not want too look at kids.
We have discussed this issue before.

As indicated by TaigaStar, JUB has a number of extremely capable Moderators who check all the threads regularly and will remove any photos they suspect are of under 18's.

Remember, if you are concerned about any threads/posts you can always send in a Post Report .... there is a facility to do this under every member's name/avatar at the left of every post.
 
Watched a fascinating documentary about this con-artist a couple of nights ago. His cons were based on the fact that he looked 10+ years younger than he really was.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hogue

Makes you twink! ;)

The documentary is mentioned in the above wiki article.
 
:help:I am growing a little concerned oversomeof the images I see in twinks, young men and jocks. some "twinks look a little boarderline aka young, to me. I am somewhat not comfortable (legal implications) in viewing this forum. I am hot for "jocks" and do not want too look at kids. Anyone feel like me. to JUB"supporters", please consider creating another forum to differenciate these catagories. thanks
look, its very simple, even for a american...if you dont like it..dont look at it!
now repeat after me..."if I dont like it..i wont look at it!"
the images of twinks ARE going to be over 18 and those that are not will be removed by the mods, and not to mention that the word twink (according to Wiki) is: "The label of Twink is used in gay slang to describe an attractive young or young-looking gay male (usually in his late teens or early twenties) with a slender build, a slight muscular physique, and little or no body hair. In some societies the term "chick" or "chicken" is preferred"
so yes thats the whole point of twinks really, they are supposed to be young looking...
and to be fair, there are more pics of buff guys on here then of twinks
to further seperate the sub forums into even more sub forums would be pointless and confusing
 
what a bizarre thread to post in the section set aside for twinks...

is he suggesting frat boys/jocks/hunks or whatever all have separate forums so he doesn't have to weed through? boo to that
 
what a bizarre thread to post in the section set aside for twinks...

I couldn't agree more!

The sites/pictures that I find disturbing are from some of the shadier Eastern European producers. The guys may not be chronologically underage, but they certainly look it based on a lifetime of malnutrition. They also get these kids to perform raw. I suspect that 'pay' for some of them consists of a meal and a warm place to sleep.
 
^^ IMO, some of those Russian boys are sadly mistreated and probably 'under age'
 
That is exactly what i am suggesting. given the current status of government accessing information,
I don't want it on my computer. also, it is inevitable, within this forum to not
"accidently" access some of those pictures.

If you "don't want it (whatever "it" is) on your computer.", there is a very simple solution. Don't access porn sites where "it" may be found, accidently or otherwise.

The internet is like TV: lots of channels for you to watch.

I don't like inane talk shows like Oprah. I don't like ridiculous hypocritical TV evangelists asking me to love the lord and send them money. I don't like rap music. Etc etc. So I avoid channels where such crap might appear, accidently or otherwise.
 
^^ IMO, some of those Russian boys are sadly mistreated and probably 'under age'

Some of those eastern european boys might be making far more money than they could have any other way. Some of them may be underage, but most of them are not. It's not hard to find cute "twink" young looking boys there that are willing to do that kind of work for a few dollars. It would be like offering some cute boy in America $15k to do a gay porn, even the straight boys would go for it, but sex isn't as guilty a sin over there so it's really not as big of a deal as some people make it out to be.
 
Back
Top