The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoTo register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
1951 Porn flick
- Thread starter moto
- Start date
braex27
Cerca Trova
Interesting. I wonder why the video is called "Smart Aleck"?
HAHA
HAHA
Keelandson
Porn Star
But what would Emily Post think? 
jameskelly
On the Prowl
That's actually pretty hot! Any more?
braex27
Cerca Trova
a little edgy
On the Prowl
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2008
- Posts
- 122
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
I love vintage erotica in small doses. I especially enjoy that "you don't have to be hot" part - the men tend to have natural bodies and leave their body hair intact, which I like.
Also, I don't like professional porn stars; they just turn me off simply by virtue of doing porn as a profession. (I don't know why that is ... just a quirk.) One thing you can definitely say about the men in stag films is that they had "day jobs," since they obviously couldn't make a living fucking on film in 1951, or whenever.
There's also something erotic about the fact that what they were doing was so forbidden at the time (not sex, but making pornography).
On the other hand, as I said, small doses: The crappy film quality and lack of real sound get boring after a while.
On the third hand, I always think it's fun to see yet more proof that, despite what some people seem to think, non-missionary sex - with the lights on, even! - was not invented in 1968. I've seen porn dating back to the 1910s, and, believe me, there is nothing we do now that they didn't do back then. Not even facials!
Also, I don't like professional porn stars; they just turn me off simply by virtue of doing porn as a profession. (I don't know why that is ... just a quirk.) One thing you can definitely say about the men in stag films is that they had "day jobs," since they obviously couldn't make a living fucking on film in 1951, or whenever.
There's also something erotic about the fact that what they were doing was so forbidden at the time (not sex, but making pornography).
On the other hand, as I said, small doses: The crappy film quality and lack of real sound get boring after a while.
On the third hand, I always think it's fun to see yet more proof that, despite what some people seem to think, non-missionary sex - with the lights on, even! - was not invented in 1968. I've seen porn dating back to the 1910s, and, believe me, there is nothing we do now that they didn't do back then. Not even facials!
sktguy
Porn Star
smoothoralbottom
Porn Star
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Posts
- 489
- Reaction score
- 50
- Points
- 0
Wow, what a rack on that first girl!