The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

60 minutes special on homosexuality

DMWN said:
I think it's a bit questionable that a mother would allow her nine year old son to go on national TV wearing finger nail polish and saying that he is a girl. They must live in an exceedingly liberal, open-minded and close-knit community. The kid was basically exploited for camera time and outed before he could do it himself.
Click to expand...

Living in an accepting environment where you never have to come out is the ultimate goal, don't you think?
 
Carey said:
I don't see why some people get so bent out of shape at research being done to pinpoint what causes homosexuality. (And they do research what causes heterosexuality…they couldn't study what makes some people gay without studying what makes others straight.) I find it fascinating and generally like to hear theories put into perspective. All sorts of traits are studied and researched. What makes people left handed gets researched...why people go bald/gray gets researched...why people have their height and eye color gets researched. Stop being so suspicious and paranoid, and treating the studies like a metaphor for researchers to find out why you're "defective..."
Click to expand...

Wonder how JUB's Humanists/Darwinians view Homos ...

The logical progression would be homos in the true sense do not procreate therefore are defected and should be eliminated from the human species.
 
SantaCBear said:
Wonder how JUB's Humanists/Darwinians view Homos ...

The logical progression would be homos in the true sense do not procreate therefore are defected and should be eliminated from the human species.
Click to expand...

Or that homos are nature's tool for population control.
 
Actually... I believe that gay people are absolutely necessary to the survival of humainty or we'd have been bred out millions of years ago.

We're the worker bees of society.
 
No.. it's not.

I think that nature is an amazing thing and gay people are here for reasons... by making sure that the chances of younger brothers being gay, the gene pool isn't as shallow.. if you have 4 sons, those same genes might be too prevellant.. by making the chances higher that those genes won't be too pervasive, there's more varried genes out there.. a broader base and stronger species altogether.

Maybe races that didn't have the gay genes or the instances of gay younger sons got too inbred with some families having too many of their DNA in the pool.. and they died out as opposed to the ones that had more gay younger sons... it gave families with only one child a better chance of having their DNA spread.

Make sense?
 
Well when I was in school I played rugby and was in the second row .... where I use to sniff the crutches of the front row hunks LOL LOL
 
The older brother study is stupid. I only have an older sister and look at me. My cousin is the oldest of three brothers and he is very gay and fem, his brothers are not gay. That study is just stupid #-o
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top