The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

7 Days To Go. Cutting My Knob Up.

Yes Or No.


  • Total voters
    40
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

stay whole Cormac :p
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

I don't think we have enough choices. Can you get a mod to add sex change?

tumblr_ph2081dVdk1xkyheno1_500.png
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

I vote NO. At your advanced age,even the smallest of surgeries can be risky.
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

Sounds like some are getting rather snippy. I can't say, it's up to you.
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

There is risk involved.
The surgery could go horribly wrong.
If you are doing it for religion-derived reasons I question your sanity.
But you are an adult and it is your choice.
However, once it's gone it's gone; there will be no going back if you don't like it.

To chop it off or not 'tis your choice.

Go for it. ..|

Don't do it! [-X
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

You know you wouldn't do it, you're Scottish.
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

I voted no.

1. Unless there is a medical reason, (and I am not prying into your personal life, Cormac), I feel it is unnecessary. My parents didn't give me a choice when I was born. I think I would have left it alone.
2. While it would probably make you unique among the population that you live with, do you think you could live without your foreskin after having it your whole life?
3. Once it happens, it's forever. There is no turning back. Can you live with that?
4. No matter what you ultimately decide, you will still be you. You are Cormac. You are adored and loved here at JUB.
5. No matter what you decide, I will support you. :D
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

your morning boner if you're still young enough to get them---will hurt for many weeks---voted Yes.:lol:
 
Neither of which is reasons for cutting a part of it off. What is left must still be washed and can still catch bugs.

And no, it won't cure your hairy palms either...

yeah was a joke but according to what I read uncut is more prone to disease---only reason to cut is --and I have known 2 Latino guys which this was the case---the foreskin is so tight it is painful to have sex because it can't be pulled all the way back---
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

I voted yes, but it is up tp you. I am used to circumcised dicks.
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

I wouldn't have millions of pleasurable nerve endings cut off my dick if I'd been given the choice. It's up to you but my vote is hell NO.
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

You know you wouldn't do it, you're Scottish.

Being a Scot is no barrier to being circumcised.

However, the NHS will not do this surgery if there is no medical reason. Seth would have to go private, and pay a small fortune to get cut.

My answer is no.
 
yeah was a joke but according to what I read uncut is more prone to

For the last bloody time, NO IT ISN'T.

The cutters and snippers have been saying for centuries that leaving a boy intact will cause hairy hands, hunchbacks, hernias, epilepsy, penile cancer and nowadays STDs. If that were the case, man would have died out long before circumcision was invented.


---only reason to cut is --and I have known 2 Latino guys which this was the case---the foreskin is so tight it is painful to have sex because it can't be pulled all the way back---

You mean phimosis. That is no reason to circumcise at all. In children, the foreskin is ALWAYS stuck to the gland. It only starts coming loose as they become old enough to masturbate, and in some cases it's a little slower than others. Also, as boys become men, usually the foreskin grows a little earlier than what's in it, but sometimes the reverse is true. This solves itself by the time you are sixteen and everything is proportionate again.

However, too many older American doctors have never received any training in how a foreskin works, so their "solution" to every "problem" is to "have it done". That's like having every broken limb "done" by amputating it.

In the rare cases where the foreskin stays too small after you have fully grown, it can simply be made larger, duh. That's a very simple type of minor surgery, much less intrusive than a full-blown circumcision, and much cheaper. Which is, of course, why American docs will "advise" to "just" cut off half of your pride and joy.
 
For the last bloody time, NO IT ISN'T.

The cutters and snippers have been saying for centuries that leaving a boy intact will cause hairy hands, hunchbacks, hernias, epilepsy, penile cancer and nowadays STDs. If that were the case, man would have died out long before circumcision was invented.




You mean phimosis. That is no reason to circumcise at all. In children, the foreskin is ALWAYS stuck to the gland. It only starts coming loose as they become old enough to masturbate, and in some cases it's a little slower than others. Also, as boys become men, usually the foreskin grows a little earlier than what's in it, but sometimes the reverse is true. This solves itself by the time you are sixteen and everything is proportionate again.

However, too many older American doctors have never received any training in how a foreskin works, so their "solution" to every "problem" is to "have it done". That's like having every broken limb "done" by amputating it.

In the rare cases where the foreskin stays too small after you have fully grown, it can simply be made larger, duh. That's a very simple type of minor surgery, much less intrusive than a full-blown circumcision, and much cheaper. Which is, of course, why American docs will "advise" to "just" cut off half of your pride and joy.


Coming from someone who had himself cut on his own, no I didn’t lose half my pride and joy. That is such an exaggerated claim by far left intactivists.

This thread was about someone getting it done for personal reasons. Clearly we can see your opinion on the subject but calling people idiots isn’t very polite.

Part of being liberal is not criticizing what someone does with their body. Liberals support abortion for christ’s Sake, but get up in arms over a damn foreskin? That thinking is so backwards, and I’m a liberal.

Once again I got cut on my own. In fact I was ANGRY my mother left me intact. I had many many reasons to get it done. It made me think of the sexual abuse as a child by the man that was uncut. I enjoyed my penis ALOT more circiumcized then left the way I was born. Loosing half of sensation is total horseshit! I maybe lost 20%, which was a good thing because it was WAY to sensitive to begin with.

If we were talking about a woman openly getting type 3 FGM infibulation, then we could start worrying about where the OP’s mind has gone.

There is no need to get over excited and throw names around. Please keep the peace and respect others life decisions.
 
I'd say you're being insensitive.

I respect your opinion. But I’m saying that it’s over exaggerated because I AM PROOF that it doesn’t. I know and remember what my penis felt like before and after. And loosing half sensation is NOT what happened to me.

I don’t feel I was insensitive at all. I stand by my real life experience Still luv ya tho.
 
Re: A Poll For My Pole.................You Decide.

If there was a third neutral option I would’ve voted that way.

I only voted yes because a lot of the far left in the gay community is so extreme about this issue like republicans are about abortion. It’s really distorted and hypocritical thinking on both sides. And on BOTH topics insults and things like “you’re so barbaric for killing your baby and innocent life vs you’re fucked up for altering your body. Like seriously people. Homosexuals get their dick pierced and transgenders COMPLETELY alter their genitals.

I used to be so biased but as I got older it’s issues like this that made me realize just how bad the far left spectrum can be. I’m liberal to the core but extremism and name calling I will not support.

A woman has the right to choose what to do with her body... but a MAN DECIDES TO cut off that skin people get all up in arms. But pay no attention to body piercings or sex changes.
 
My father was a very religious Catholic and felt that no God who was supposed to be all knowing would not have even suggested you mess with his work. When I was in the army some ass hole in my unit was a pig who never washed properly according to a Doctor on Base and suggested he get a circumcision. He was in pain for a year with countless infections do not be a fool you will loose sensitivity and there is no going back!
 
Back
Top