The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

All Eyes on Oregon Marriage Case

yea, they've been trying to weasel their way into the case even though lower courts have repeatedly said they have no standing :mad:
 
One understand that NOM is fairly begging supporters to turn up at the June rally in Washington despite their bullshit on their website.

Note the prominence of 'DONATE TODAY'

http://www.nomblog.com/39214/

Hopefully Huckabee will be silenced with their defeat as well...
 
Well that is one good sign......
 
^^^I think that that's the main reason why Kennedy requested responses from the plaintiffs.
 
I appreciate that the specific legal arguments are different, but it is interesting that SCOTUS would refuse to stay gay marriages in Oregon, when it was so enthusiastic about staying gay marriage in Utah.

The plaintiffs brief put NOM in its place and so did the denial. It indicates nothing beyond that.
 
I appreciate that the specific legal arguments are different, but it is interesting that SCOTUS would refuse to stay gay marriages in Oregon, when it was so enthusiastic about staying gay marriage in Utah.

I think it boils down to consideration

[Damn -- left to go get Bammer some water, came back, and haven't the slightest clue what I was going to say. Maybe I've been a bit heavy on the "special cookies" for pain.]


It would be nice to know the court's reasoning on the two cases.
 
The Gov and AG in Oregon fully agree with the plaintiffs, so if NOM were granted status, and a re-hearing, there is still only a very slim chance they'd prevail; so, no stay for such a remote possibility.

Utah's Gov and AG are (very!) actively opposing the decision, with a realistic (in theory anyway) possibility of prevailing.
 
Back
Top