Chalchalero
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2007
- Posts
- 2,207
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
^^^ true that! Barack the vote. Obama !!!! Let's make history.
Barack the vote - I like that!
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
^^^ true that! Barack the vote. Obama !!!! Let's make history.
Fair enough Chalchalero..Point taken.
I haven't given up on the Democrats either...Not yet..
This november, I will most likely vote the straight Democratic ticket,as I have done for years..
However, afterwards I going to be a registered Independent .
At least you can get the hell out of here when the house to house fighting starts..
I hope the Democrats will not lose faith. Looking at the big picture in the most objective way, Obama really is the desired choice for a President now that Hillary is out of the picture.
Obama, from the international standpoint (almost the entire rest-of-the-world prays he'll be the President-elect), and Obama, from the national standpoint (four more years of George Bush policies? I'd rather be barbecued.)
Chalchalero, if I might pass along a compliment: your last post showed incredible insight and advanced levels of objective thinking. I especially respect that you're willing to admit truths with which you don't necessarily agree. Kudos to you.
You're comparing apples to oranges.
The US, a former colony of the UK, inherited much of its zeitgeist from its mother country--its legal system, its customs to some extent, its language, and even a lot of its food.
Iran is a horse of a different color!
Unclean, I've gleaned the idea that countries mature just like human beings do. If this analogy is correct, the United States could be compared to an adolescent--loud, brash, too prone to excess--while the UK could be compared to the Mother that it really is.
Taking this analogy further, just look how much advancement most Northern European countries have achieved over the last century...
It's food for thought, anyway.
You are quite right. My theory is oversimplified for the sake of clarity.
The truth is of course too complex to detail here. Suffice it to say that civilization has a birth, a period of richness, a period of liberalism, and a period of decline as it ages, subject to possible rebirth.
If you will take a walk of history, you'll see this pattern again and again: Ancient Rome; ancient Greece, ancient Babylonia, even the American Indian culture. (It is not widely known, for example, that the Navajo Nation was a rather sophisticated nation for its time--for example, it practiced group therapy long before psychoanalysis even had a name in Western culture). Moreover, civilizations rise and fall even within a single nation. (Does anybody remember Weimar Germany? Gay rights were virtually unknown in Western Civilization before that period, but Weimar Germany Berlin had gay bars, bisexual bars, etc., on every corner until the "fall"; Weimar Germany was the real birthplace of gay rights.) Let's not forget, too, the British Empire, which was bowdlerized by World War 2. Civilizations can fall but are subject to renewal and rebirth.
In the case of the United States, I contend that its relative youth is responsible for some of its issues. This is, admittedly, purely subjective, but it does seem to follow the general pattern of birth, wealth, liberalism--and eventual decline.
, and Canada you know you can get insufferably smug)