The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

American Music Awards

That makes little difference, because she's mentioned and discussed HEAVILY on every other music site/message board/entertainment blog. :lol:

And if I hadn't posted in your Susan Boyle thread or even this here thread, they would be dead. You're welcome for me sparking life into them. ;)

Your level of delusion still astounds me at times. Of course she's mentioned and discussed heavily on FAN sites like CW. That's what delusional people do. They get together and talk amongst themselves. ANYONE with a fan base, no matter how small has one nowadays.

Not sure why you keep bring up Susan Boyle. #-o

As for bringing life into threads SexyKevTauren79 is the ONLY reason the WH is constantly being bumped.
 
Your level of delusion still astounds me at times. Of course she's mentioned and discussed heavily on FAN sites like CW. That's what delusional people do. They get together and talk amongst themselves. ANYONE with a fan base, no matter how small has one nowadays.

Not sure why you keep bring up Susan Boyle. #-o

As for bringing life into threads SexyKevTauren79 is the ONLY reason the WH is constantly being bumped.

I'm not talking about her FAN sites, dear. I'm talking about POPULAR entertainment/news sites with credibility - like CNN.com, PeopleMagazine.com, TheHuffingtonPost.com, all the popular gossip blogs that receive millions of traffic/visitors (Perez Hilton, Media Take Out, Towerload, ThatGrapeJuice, AfterElton, Pink Is The New Blog, Crunk and Disorderly, ect.)

Whitney Houston is discussed on all them SITES THAT REALLY MATTER when it comes to what's "relevant" or not, the sites most people go to online for their news/gossip. Them sites that GET THE ATTENTION/EXPOSURE that matters. And Whitney Houston's news stories are ALWAYS reported and talked about on these aforementioned sites, as well as Access Hollywood, Entertainment Tonight, The Insider, Extra, ect. Now I love JUB, but JUB isn't being brought up or cited on any of these shows where millions are exposed to and tuning in for. And Whitney Houston is always TRENDING on Twitter, another popular site. She's always talked about everytime any one of her CLASSIC movies air on tv, or whenever she appears on tv. People tweet about her HEAVILY. People are talking/discussing her and checking for her. Maybe not so much here, but everywhere else where it matters. So, anybody's opinion/dislike for her on this site is, using one of your favs, pretty irrelevant.

*BOOM* :D
 
:rotflmao:

WOW,

You just don't get it, do you?

With a pretty whack and weightless comeback like that, obviously you DO get it. And it's the very point made in my previous post that you DO get and left you with nothing else to say other than to brush me off. :lol:

That's all I needed. You get it and can't fight the facts. The leading news/gossip sites and news shows on television obviously say Whitney Houston is still very much a big deal with all the news coverage/interviews/time slots they give her. :wave:
 
You get it. Just like I do. ALL the leading and popular news sites are posting about Whitney, talking about Whitney, supporting Whitney, wishing Whitney and her next endeavers well. So while you are ragging on the official Whitney Houston thread here on JUB not getting much action, Whitney is being discussed on The Huffiington Post every other week or whenever new news breaks about her....and CNN is carrying a "Whitney's comeback to the big screen" story....and so is E! News and Fox news. With many comments on each new story that they report about her. With most of the readers getting excited for her return (again).

You still don't get it? :lol:
 
I'll just accept that as your defeat to the facts I just provided you. You're all outta steam now...nothing left to say after I shut you down. I can read between the lines of you posting the same message over and over. :lol: Whitney's discussed HEAVILY on all the hot websites, boo. Thanks for watching/tuning in! See ya in Whitney's official JUB thread next time some news comes out.

#Done.
(!)
 
Whitney Houston? Be serious now. She's way past her best. She was a wonderful artist. Many years ago. Time to move on. And the media covers a variety of artists. Anyways, her legal battles, marriage battles, substance abuse, and so forth... really took a toll on her.

The fact that she is way past her best is not the point. Madonna, Mariah Carey, Celine Dion, Aretha Franklin ect -- all the big divas are ALL way past their best. Just because an artist has reached their peak and is 'past their best' doesn't mean they just go die somewhere and stop working altogether. Lol. You say its time to move on when her latest album was #1 and sold more than most of the hot newer singers' albums did. That's not grounds to "move on"...lol

And yes, her personal issues did take a good toll on her. And the media covers a variety of artists that are still relevant enough to be still covered/talked about today...Whitney obviously still is. You don't see Stephanie Mills, Donna Summer, Tina Turner, Jermaine Jackson, LaToya Jackson (when it's not regarding Michael Jackson, that is) in the news in the media every other week because most of the general public simply doesn't care to talk about them all the time like they would Whitney Houston, Madonna who are still relevant enough to report on because they still spark interest. The media doesn't always stay reporting on something/someone that's irrelevant. Irrelevant people don't catch headlines or aren't newsworthy at all.

...and I love that this thread has turned focus on Whitney Houston. :D
 
Some artists peak earlier then others. And just because she is covered a lot in the media doesn't speak for her popularity. The media often needs something to cover.

The fact that she is covered alot in the media speaks for her relevancy and how much of a big deal she STILL is. Doesn't matter how much you try to water it down. The media simply doesn't cover things that THE VIEWERS don't respond to or care about. This is why Beyonce is always in the news and an indie singer isn't. People respond to Beyonce and care about her because she is a big deal and newsworthy to people. That's how it is in the media. Whitney's stories/headlines get a lot of traction and attention, because people show interest in them. Point blank.

Whitney's Oprah interview was the highest rated show of Oprah's show in YEARS. People show interest in her! No matter which way you want to slice it. When Whitney appeared on the X-Factor just last year, it was their highest rated show in the show's history! That's the facts. Whitney Houston is very much still a big deal. "Washed up", past her best, "irrelevant" or whatever her dislikers want to call her. She still pulls in high ratings, huge numbers and huge interest from people. ..|
 
Whitney Houston? Be serious now. She's way past her best. She was a wonderful artist. Many years ago. Time to move on. And the media covers a variety of artists. Anyways, her legal battles, marriage battles, substance abuse, and so forth... really took a toll on her.

SexyKevTaurean79 is in such a state of delusion he doesn't realise any of that. Just because someone is written about doesn't make them newsworthy or relevant.
 
Back
Top