Norri
Sex God
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2022
- Posts
- 646
- Reaction score
- 357
- Points
- 63
It was also JFK’s constitutional duty as the executive is in charge of enforcement. But I completely disagree with you as what the court will do here they will back up Biden and probably unanimously. They did tell Texas to remove the barbed wire yesterday. But that’s not the point anyone with a taste for power wouldn’t care nationalize the guard and make Abbott the one who runs to court while you win the day. For crying out loud that’s what Abbott is doing he is clearly breaking US law but doesn’t care because he’s winning the political day.Well on the side of the angels...there wasn't one...but it ultimately led to the loss of Dixie Democrats to the Republicans and the far right MAGAt's of today's GQP.
In part because it inflamed the issue of 'states rights' and an increasing hatred of the federal government.
There was an inevitability built into the decisions.
And of course, now that we see key civil rights decisions being overturned by a right wing SC...it is even more depressing to think that so much is being lost.
I would say that with the current SC you'd have to be a cockeyed optimist to think that the executive branch could unilateraaly act without the justices ruling in favour of the State of Texas. The days of JFK et al are over until there is a rebalanced Court.
It occurred to me while thinking about the Brown desegregation decision that conservatives today hate the idea of institutional racism no matter the evidence but that case certainly shows that the justices believed in such racism. If not they could have just thrown money at the problem.





































