Ann Coulter joins GoProud Advisory Council

[ShihTzuTylenol]

GOProud actively supports same-sex marriage, hate-crimes legislations, etc

Please show me where Coulter has called us a faggot and a sissy boy. You're referring to the John Edwards incident and last time I checked, he was a straight man. So you're purposely misleading

BTW,

"Uncle Tom" is an ethnic slur.

"C***" is a misogynistic epithet.

But Coulter's latest book Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America is a fascinating read! It dissects the far-left's mob mentality.

I watched the entire 2 hours of her BookTv interview on CSPAN yesterday so I feel I have been enlightened enough to say, she's a fucking [closet racist] homophobic idiot, cow.
just sayin'

 

[Kulindahr]

Lies, lies, and idiotic statements -- Coulter's stock in trade.

I've read stuff she's written, and watched lots of footage. She misquotes, misinterprets, and just plain makes stuff up, regularly. In the video above she shows herself the same -- lying and ignorant.

She's not even worth my time to point out the errors.

 

[csb999]

I can say this , knowing full well that it will only be read by a small number , and generally ignored as most of my observations seem to be . I am by my own description , point - blank hippy-Canadian-liberal-left-progressive , totally a member of the group Anne Coulter will consistently attack . A thought-game or exercise : it it entirely possible to regard Anne Coulter as a complete plant of the progressive left , she will do the supreme service of blurting out uncontested the most extreme paranoid fantasies of the left that even members of the progressive-left could never accuse the right of ( militarily forcing Christianity on Iraq ?) Rush Limbaugh's grandfather was a Republican senator , there is nothing in her history at all to make her anything but the most liberal . She is demonstrably not the product of the looney American Christian right , and there is no reason to think they support her now . Her principle perhaps her sole role is to give us a target , to consolidate and give voice to the worst fears that the active republicans will not . And I do wager that almost all her entire audience , and the people who buy her books , are certifiably the opposite . There would seem to be no evidence that she is anything but a liberal-left plant . Two asides . Several years ago she did a speaking-tour of Canada , and has written disapprovingly of this country . Canada has historically often been the end for Americans escaping from other Americans : this has been happening for centuries . So predictably she attacked the draft-dodgers , a number of American men escaping conscription to Viet Nam ; surprisingly she also attacked the UEL , United Empire Loyalists , pro- British escapees from the Revolutionary War ( historically an important group here ); but she did not touch the fact that Canada was the end of the Underground Railway - The British Empire and Canada abolished slavery something like 40 or 50 years before the United States , so many black slaves escaped to this country ( over a much longer period ,I am uncertain about the relative sizes of these groups ). I took her omission as proof that even the looney right in the U. S. is no longer racist . Another aside . A significant factor im my politics has always been the political independence of this country You could argue that Canada is a number of former British colonies that joined principally to avoid absorption by the U. S. . We have been invaded twice by the U.S. , and something like 90 % + of our population is within maybe 20 miles of the border , so invading Canada would be very quick and easy and make a lost of sense . Anne Coulter in one of her speeches basically said that Canada is only independent because of the good graces of some Washington politicians so don't get too full of yourself , don't get too uppity . And I am grateful that she said that - that is the truth , the historical reality of Canada that no Canadian poltician will touch . I do wonder that an issue in government , a factor in the formulation of policy is just that we don't want to piss off the Americans too much .

 

[ThreeCrows]

From Rareboy's post - bolded part by me:

“Marriage is not a civil right,” Coulter told the roomful of gay conservatives. “You’re not black.” She also said GOProud was a natural ally of anti-abortion groups, because, “as soon as they find the gay gene, you know who’s getting aborted.”

She really is just filth. How anyone can defend her is beyond me.

In relation to what csb999 posted - When I first became aware of her, I thought she might be doing some kind of high concept performance art or a counter-political statement, simply because she's so absurd.
She's not. She is making a buck off of being the most disgusting, insulting and outrageous voice the petulant and thin-skinned GOP has to offer.

 

[hotatlboi]

She's against gay marriage.

GOProud is against gay marriage.

Sounds like they will get along fine.

The only thing GOProud is "proud" of is their status as second class citizens.

 

[chrisrobin]

I'm concerned about Ann Coulter. However, I am more concerned about those that buy her books,
presupposing that they can read.

 

[JayQueer]

I'm concerned about Ann Coulter. However, I am more concerned about those that buy her books,
presupposing that they can read.

I've read a couple of her books & while I honestly didn't agree with everything she wrote, I did find myself nodding in agreement with a lot of her other points. She's not afraid to be honest and say the things that most of us think about, but we never say out loud because it would be "politically incorrect."

I dare any of the more "liberal" & "open-minded" guys on this forum to actually read just one of Ann Coulter's books. That's okay if you still disagree with her & even hate her, but at least you were "open-minded" to read what she had to say.

If you don't want to buy her books, you can borrow them from your local library. If your library in your liberal neighborhood isn't open-minded enough to carry books from conservative thinkers, you can always buy one of her books from the bookstore & return it for a refund within 2 weeks (most bookstores have at least a 2 week return policy).

 

[TheFireGod]

I'll never get the Coulter hate.

she's like Stephen Colbert except she knows how to do subtlety.

Second.

On that note, I'm glad GOProud is inclusive of transexuals too!

 

[JayQueer]

From Rareboy's post - bolded part by me:


She really is just filth. How anyone can defend her is beyond me.

In relation to what csb999 posted - When I first became aware of her, I thought she might be doing some kind of high concept performance art or a counter-political statement, simply because she's so absurd.
She's not. She is making a buck off of being the most disgusting, insulting and outrageous voice the petulant and thin-skinned GOP has to offer.

I actually agree with Ann Coulter about her quote, "once they find the gay gene, you know who's getting aborted."

Given that human sexuality is very complex, it's highly doubtful there is a "gay gene", but it is very reasonable that we will someday be able to determine whether a fetus (based on genetic testing & hormonal exposure) has a low probability or a high probability of growing up to be homosexual.

And trust me, when the day comes when a pregnant woman is told that her male fetus has a high likelihood of growing to be a gay man.........and the would-be mother decides to have an abortion because "being gay is an abomination" and she "doesn't want her son to spend eternity in hell".........ALL of you will become PRO-LIFE immediately.

 

[ThreeCrows]

I actually agree with Ann Coulter about her quote, "once they find the gay gene, you know who's getting aborted."

Given that human sexuality is very complex, it's highly doubtful there is a "gay gene", but it is very reasonable that we will someday be able to determine whether a fetus (based on genetic testing & hormonal exposure) has a low probability or a high probability of growing up to be homosexual.

And trust me, when the day comes when a pregnant woman is told that her male fetus has a high likelihood of growing to be a gay man.........and the would-be mother decides to have an abortion because "being gay is an abomination" and she "doesn't want her son to spend eternity in hell".........ALL of you will become PRO-LIFE immediately.

Foolishness. With the "pro-life" comment, you've already cornered yourself.

I actually agree with Ann Coulter about her quote, "once they find the gay gene, you know who's getting aborted."

This is disgusting. And I am disgusted that you would agree. Do you have any clue what she means?

Given that human sexuality is very complex, it's highly doubtful there is a "gay gene"

Ok, then turn straight. No genetic boundaries. Go. Do it. Now.

Oh, and by the way - You do not ever get the chance to tell me what I will be politically on pro-life terms or pro-choice terms. Learn this.

 

[chrisrobin]

And trust me,

I've noticed that those who have the need to say, "trust me" are untrustworthy. If you have this compelling need, that can only indicate that you are untrustworthy. I don't trust you. You cannot DEMAND trust, here or anywhere else. Trust is something you need to EARN.

I actually agree with Ann Coulter about her quote, "once they find the gay gene, you know who's getting aborted."

You claim that you want less government. Yet you deny a woman the right to make decisions about her own body. In your estimation, you are implying that women aren't intelligent enough to make this decision. You want less government but only when it is compatible with your own agenda.

 

[pai mei]

I've read a couple of her books & while I honestly didn't agree with everything she wrote, I did find myself nodding in agreement with a lot of her other points. She's not afraid to be honest and say the things that most of us think about, but we never say out loud because it would be "politically incorrect."

I dare any of the more "liberal" & "open-minded" guys on this forum to actually read just one of Ann Coulter's books. That's okay if you still disagree with her & even hate her, but at least you were "open-minded" to read what she had to say.

If you don't want to buy her books, you can borrow them from your local library. If your library in your liberal neighborhood isn't open-minded enough to carry books from conservative thinkers, you can always buy one of her books from the bookstore & return it for a refund within 2 weeks (most bookstores have at least a 2 week return policy).

ann isn't serious literary work in the field of politics. period. and i only read works of value.

and i also don't read for recreational purposes, so... i have no desire to read her stuff.

anyone who is seriously involved in politics, wouldn't read her books. that's simply reality.

 

[JayQueer]

Foolishness. With the "pro-life" comment, you've already cornered yourself.

How so? I've been pretty open all along that I am pro-life. I don't believe in killing a helpless unborn (but living) baby because her mother had a wild night in Vegas with a random man she met, but now she doesn't want to play "mommy" anymore.

This is disgusting. And I am disgusted that you would agree. Do you have any clue what she means?

I know exactly what she means. When she says, "once they find the gay gene, you know who's getting aborted," she means that once they are able to predict which fetuses have a high probability or chance of growing up to be homosexual, their mothers will abort them because they don't want a gay son or daughter.

Ok, then turn straight. No genetic boundaries. Go. Do it. Now.

No, re-read what I said above. Given that there are hundreds of human genes that together determine skin color, is it highly unlikely there is a single gene that determines sexual orientation. Rather, it is more likely that sexual orientation is determined by a combination of genetics, as well as hormonal exposure & sensitivity to the baby during pregnancy, and environmental influences during childhood.

Nevertheless, given the rate of scientific & medical progress, it is likely we will one day be able to predict (but not guarantee) which fetuses MAY become gay adults.

Oh, and by the way - You do not ever get the chance to tell me what I will be politically on pro-life terms or pro-choice terms. Learn this.

Okay, so when women start aborting babies because they believe that baby will grow up to be gay -- you will still defend those women's rights to do as she pleases with her body. I understand.

 

[JayQueer]

I've noticed that those who have the need to say, "trust me" are untrustworthy. If you have this compelling need, that can only indicate that you are untrustworthy. I don't trust you. You cannot DEMAND trust, here or anywhere else. Trust is something you need to EARN.

I think I am very trustworthy, and while I speak with candor, I also do it with class.

I don't call any political figures (even with whom I disagree) derogatory names like "cunt of cuntistan" like others here have done. I also treat everyone here on JUB with respect -- feel free to find any other posts in which I have called any other poster here a derogatory name. You won't find any.

You claim that you want less government. Yet you deny a woman the right to make decisions about her own body. In your estimation, you are implying that women aren't intelligent enough to make this decision. You want less government but only when it is compatible with your own agenda.

Okay. So when women start aborting fetuses "because they don't want a gay son," you will still be defending a woman's right to make decisions about her own body. If a woman is "intelligent enough" to decide that she doesn't want to raise a gay son, and would rather abort that pregnancy and "try again for a normal child," you will be perfectly okay with that. Right?

 

[quasar]

How so? I've been pretty open all along that I am pro-life. I don't believe in killing a helpless unborn (but living) baby because her mother had a wild night in Vegas with a random man she met, but now she doesn't want to play "mommy" anymore.

I know exactly what she means. When she says, "once they find the gay gene, you know who's getting aborted," she means that once they are able to predict which fetuses have a high probability or chance of growing up to be homosexual, their mothers will abort them because they don't want a gay son or daughter.

Okay, so when women start aborting babies because they believe that baby will grow up to be gay -- you will still defend those women's rights to do as she pleases with her body. I understand.

Whilst you may be pro-life, and whilst you think that Ann [STRIKE]Cunter's[/STRIKE] Coulter's comments will turn everyone pro-life, having pro-life legislation in place won't stop abortions anymore than me standing on a volcano will stop it erupting. In fact you'll probably find that once it is possible to determine or predict many aspects and features of an unborn child, legislation would be passed to prevent abortions based on these non-physical aspects. Well, certainly in more tolerant countries. (But it still wouldn't stop 'underground' abortions!)

 

[Kulindahr]

If you don't want to buy her books, you can borrow them from your local library. If your library in your liberal neighborhood isn't open-minded enough to carry books from conservative thinkers, you can always buy one of her books from the bookstore & return it for a refund within 2 weeks (most bookstores have at least a 2 week return policy).

Having read some of her work, I dispute whether she can reasonably be called a "thinker". Most of her chapters wouldn't even get graded at the master's level where I studied; they'd be tossed back as "do over", because they're sloppy and the documentation is substandard.

Foolishness. With the "pro-life" comment, you've already cornered yourself.


This is disgusting. And I am disgusted that you would agree. Do you have any clue what she means?


Ok, then turn straight. No genetic boundaries. Go. Do it. Now.

Oh, and by the way - You do not ever get the chance to tell me what I will be politically on pro-life terms or pro-choice terms. Learn this.

I was going to critique this post, but JQ already did a fair job, so I'll just add that this is one of the more irrational attempts at a reply lately in this forum.



BTW, the only real problem with phrases like "cunt of cuntistan" -- oh, heck, that sounds like a topic for that weirder and wilder forum, HT.

 

[hotatlboi]

I just threw up all over the carpet.

What a fucking farce.

How is this a farce?

From what I've heard from them both, her views seem to be pretty in line with theirs.

I like the matchup. Shows how pathetic GOProud really is.

 

[chrisrobin]

Whilst you may be pro-life, and whilst you think that Ann [STRIKE]Cunter's[/STRIKE] Coulter's comments will turn everyone pro-life, having pro-life legislation in place won't stop abortions anymore than me standing on a volcano will stop it erupting. In fact you'll probably find that once it is possible to determine or predict many aspects and features of an unborn child, legislation would be passed to prevent abortions based on these non-physical aspects. Well, certainly in more tolerant countries. (But it still wouldn't stop 'underground' abortions!)

Back in the "olden days" there was a king by the name of Herod. When he got wind of the fact that a "new" king was about to be born, he ordered all the male children to be slaughtered. Unless you are an advocate of infanticide, most folks probably found this order to be repugnant. We all know the outcome. Say, Herod my man, wherever you are... how did that work out for ya?
I'm fascinated by the comparison of homosexuality to Down's syndrome, although there are many who believe that being gay is a form of retardation.
Rhetorical question: why are so many "pro-lifers" in favor of capital punishment?

 

[jackoroe]

Back in the "olden days" there was a king by the name of Herod. When he got wind of the fact that a "new" king was about to be born, he ordered all the male children to be slaughtered. Unless you are an advocate of infanticide, most folks probably found this order to be repugnant. We all know the outcome. Say, Herod my man, wherever you are... how did that work out for ya?
I'm fascinated by the comparison of homosexuality to Down's syndrome, although there are many who believe that being gay is a form of retardation.
Rhetorical question: why are so many "pro-lifers" in favor of capital punishment?

Rhetorical answer: There is a substantive difference between putting a convicted mass murderer to death and cutting an unborn baby into little pieces while still in the mother's womb. I think most reasonable people understand that kind of difference, don't you?

And for the record, homosexuality was considered a form of mental illness until the early 1970's. So, I think we've come quite a distance in that regard.

 

[chrisrobin]

I think I am very trustworthy, and while I speak with candor, I also do it with class.

You may very well be trustworthy. My point is that someone who says "trust me" generally is not. I used to work with someone whose pet phrase was "I'll be perfectly honest with you," and he was consistently a lying piece of shit.

If I say that Ann Coulter is a man, does that meet with your high standards of behavior? Of course, if "she" really is a man, I think his credibility leaves something to be desired. I wonder if he shaves with a straight razor, the shaves are always so nice and close. A little pancake makeup would probably be a nice finishing touch, too. For publications, Photoshop is good for removing "five-o-clock shadow."