Ann Coulter's mouth should be sewn shut

[gsdx]

The biggest difference between us and Ann Coulter is that we don't get paid to insult millions of people.

 

[pat grimshaw]

I'm sick of those PC People. They claim to be "defending the defenceless" but all too often they're just self-important, self-rightous, interfering biddies.

 

[diamondstar]

Why does my cousin gotta be so damn ratchet? Damn Ann, I told you what happens when you give your so call "opinions" on shit. I tell you this shit all the time "If you got nothing nice to say, don't say it at all"

 

[Kulindahr]

Obviously, you will mall agree that Obama's mouth should be sewn for calling Romney a "bullshitter".

Why? Romney is a bullshitter -- he's laid down more lies and pitched more platitudes and spaced on more specifics than everyone else in the campaign since the primaries started, combined... and those are the ones people bothered to document.

 

[Lefty]

How precious is this???

Tombastep and That girl singing the same song.

By the way boys, maybe you should learn all the words
before you try to carry the tune...EH!

Definitions courtesy of the Urban Dictionary

cunt

A term for the female genitals, and a highly insulting term (if you're American; many people in Britain and Australia actually use it among friends as a term of endearment).

bitch

1. Annoying and whining female.
2. Female Dog

and so you boys were saying?
________________________________________________



@Patsy, Okay 'mate' but do try and remember Downunder or Upover,
PC is pretty nigh almost always determined by the party you are with.

 

[LilBit]

^What's your point?

 

[pat grimshaw]

……PC is pretty nigh almost always determined by the party you are with. ...

This is Just Us Boys. If there are 'boys' in JUB who have intellectual impairment or learning difficulties or whatever I encourage them to raise the issue themselves.

 

[Lefty]

^^

ask ram honey ... maybe he can show you.

^

Oh my gosh...JUB is political?

 

[gsdx]

I'm sick of those PC People. They claim to be "defending the defenceless" but all too often they're just self-important, self-rightous, interfering biddies.

John Franklin Stephens 'defended the defenceless'. Surely he isn't just a 'self-important, self-righteous, interfering biddy'.

 

[pat grimshaw]

…Pat, I don't think I've ever heard you utter a single kind word to anybody.

You're not paying attention, Johann. I have —as Shakespeare would say— 'infinite varieties' of kindness. I show complete loyalty to JUBBers* and gay men but much less to the rest. I admit sometimes one has to be cruel to be kind (such as when those adolescent JUBbers want to wreck their life by staining their young bodies with ugly markings).

* OK; there's one exception to this rule but that venerable canadian with his admiration for invective is an inveterate bitch.

 

[pat grimshaw]

I can't agree with you on the first para. Saggers may be OK but permanent markings are insane.

…I don't know why anyone would want to glorify the prison experience!…

Because, unfortunately, we're living in an Infantocracy which loves Trash Culture and aspires to be 'Bad". (I'll check out that website)

 

[Lefty]

@ Don Quixote

Six Sigma??

Esplain to Lefty wot chew means

 

[Kulindahr]

For the life of me, I don't know why anyone would want to glorify the prison experience!!

Because it feeds the Neanderthal conviction that might makes right and brains are for losers. Since so many neo-Nazis and similar skinheads are in prisons, their on-the-outside brethren glorify it as a trial, persecution by their lessers/inferiors.

 

[pat grimshaw]

Your generation created this "trash culture" in the 70's and 80's.

Most sociologists will tell you it began after World War II when your country and mine were going through a time of affluence. 'Teenage Culture' began and the advertisers pursued them. Dr Spock decreed that children should do just whatever they want. Anti-heroes like Brando, Dean etc. were venerated.

Time Magazine referred to the 1970s/80s as 'The Me Generation' and Mr Gecko said 'Greed is Good' and we became recognised.

Now we're moving towards a genderless society.

Kids have a 'healthy sense of Entitlement' while Kanye West, Chris Brown etc behave like brats but are paid millions more it.

It's a been a gradual process from the strict Patriarchy of the 19th century down into our into a free-capital, trash Infantocracy.

 

[DonQuixote]

Johan - that about sums up the she-bitch Coulter, who stands, unrelenting, in her use of the term.

My esteemed Prancing Pony,
My correlation to Six Sigma has to do with acceptable tolerances. Six Sigma is a continuous process improvement, narrowing the field of acceptable products. This is a plus/minus in how you look at it.

When it comes to products - it means highly repeatable, consistent products (though, not necessarily of BEST quality, but of a certain band of tolerance - a Big Mac is not 5* cuisine, but you KNOW what you're going to get when you walk into a Mickie D's world round.)
Acceptable language usage is similar - in my own, personal, definitions, I like a wide variety of (intelligent?!) discourse, and try to tolerate(mayhaps ENCOURAGE?!) a wide selection of vocabulary with which to express one's opinions/beliefs. Perhaps I extend to three "standard deviations" ("Sigma" = 1 Std Dev.) in latitude from the completely urbane norms. Over time, the use of certain words in specific circumstances exceed those bounds.

Now, here is where it gets dicey, and perhaps off topic, but related -
One(many) could de Facto apply this to the biologic/theologic spectrum as well.
Hence the extreme hate(?!) of all things homosexual by the extreme alleged theists - though some may consider them mostly ignorant.

All of this revolves around Pareto's Principle - which is an empirically observed feature of nature, and some (this author included) of God's Divine Presence. Simply put, the 80:20 law.

Pareto principle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The term "Pareto principle" can also refer to Pareto efficiency.

The Pareto principle (also known as the 80–20 rule, the law of the vital few, and the principle of factor sparsity) states that, for many events, roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes.[1][2]

Business-management consultant Joseph M. Juran suggested the principle and named it after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who observed in 1906 that 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population; he developed the principle by observing that 20% of the pea pods in his garden contained 80% of the peas.[2]

It is a common rule of thumb in business; e.g., "80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients". Mathematically, where something is shared among a sufficiently large set of participants, there must be a number k between 50 and 100 such that "k% is taken by (100 − k)% of the participants". The number k may vary from 50 (in the case of equal distribution, i.e. 100% of the population have equal shares) to nearly 100 (when a tiny number of participants account for almost all of the resource). There is nothing special about the number 80% mathematically, but many real systems have k somewhere around this region of intermediate imbalance in distribution.[3]



If you look, and you don't have to look too closely, you will see that 80% of a given population fall within 3 Sigma (standard deviation) of the median or "norm" - that which defines "normal".

That includes virtually everything about us - including sexuality - with those things outside the Three Sigma boundaries, on either side, viewed as abnormal. From the extremely homosexual on one side to the extremely asexual on the other.

Inside the "normal" spectrum, the Absolute Median is a person of balanced heterosexuality, with empathy that extends to people of the same sex - in the case of men, our "female" side, and vice-versa for the ladies. One could argue multiple planes here - from fashion sense to mannerisms to sexual taste.

People are most comfortable "with their own kind". Those of a lesser ability to appreciate the variety of life/life styles out there abhor anything different. And they absolutely don't abide "them" having the same "right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness".

That overlays the Three Sigma to Six Sigma spectrum.
Sadly, the more polarized we become, the narrower the acceptably spectrum becomes.

Fine precision in Manufacturing is a good thing.

Not so much in nature - for it is the EXCEPTIONAL in nature that promotes evolution and change.
Hitler was all about narrowing the spectrum of variability in mankind - if you weren't a blue-eyed, blond of Aryan descent, you weren't what he wanted (he wasn't, either, since he had Jewish ancestry in his blood line.)

While we need to control manufacturing processes, and we need/want to control(subdue in the biblical sense) true genetic deformities, such as spina bifida, and similar, we do NOT want to limit the genetic variety of life in a major sense -we want to embrace it. That can and should include Gay people having surrogate parenting to propagate, too, if that is their desire.

I know, a bit off topic, but I think it goes to the heart of the matter.

 

[Kulindahr]

DQ, I presume that among the 20% aren't just the exceptional who are builders, but the exceptional who are destroyers -- order v chaos. I submit that Coulter is a destroyer.

 

[Lefty]

@ Don the Quixotic...

80% of my thinking is done in 20% of my brain.

80% of my lusting is done in 20% of my genitalia the rest is found after in my shorts.

80% of my humour is understood by 20% of a given populace.

80% of me wonders what the fuck the 20% of my brain was thinking when it

let me respond to a post about that unpopular person.

20% of my brain says 80% I live to sheltered of a real world life.

Statistically speaking, I need to work on the genitalia per centages,

80% of the time the other 20% doesn't matter. EH?

Six Sigma not sick smegma for all.

 

[Lefty]

All feeble attempts at making light aside,

Johann I have to agree with you. My own forays into the encroachment of mankind on civilisation show
that after the basic eras of food shelter safety and progeny the strictures of society gradually loosened.
Every era that ensued grew slightly easier for the next batch and thus 'play' time was discovered. The
path of progresson continued and so did the lessening of hard scrabble.

More time to play increased indulgences which propagated more indulgences, each of the succeeding
generations expected more 'play' less work. Thus was born teen angst and rebellion. Simple equation,
too much time not needed for survival allows societal rules to flex and dilute.

Third world countries are just now starting to experience the phenomena whilst the antics have become
the normal in other socio-economic groupings. L'avis de Rigueur is now considered to be a litany of various
violations of 'human rights'.
______________________________________________________
other than that, it appears that the generation that gave us
Ann, with or without minions, failed birth control 101.

 

[bike10]

Just think how much she gains if Romney wins in November?

 

[Benvolio]

I have predicted a Romney landslide victory. I am more confident each day.