The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Another example of 'be careful what you wish for'

I think that being seen dumping body parts near Clifton Suspension Bridge is going to land one in court whatever the backstory. The fact that the backstory involves extreme gay sex and a Columbian male prostitute certainly adds spice.
 
I think that being seen dumping body parts near Clifton Suspension Bridge is going to land one in court whatever the backstory. The fact that the backstory involves extreme gay sex and a Columbian male prostitute certainly adds spice.
If they had stuck to Spice they would have slept though it :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Latest:


Apparently, Mosquera intended to throw the bodies off Clifton Suspension Bridge and into the River Avon. I can't see why he couldn't have stayed in London and chucked them into the Thames.
 
Maybe he had heard about what happened with Michael Alig?

My point really was that as the murders occurred in London, why would Mosquera travel 120 miles to Bristol to dispose of the bodies rather than do it locally. I've just read up on Michael Alig. That murder and the body disposal all took place in New York.
 
Last edited:
I look forward to reading the full story and his defence, if any

His defence was twofold. Firstly, one of his victims killed the other one. Secondly, although he admitted to killing one of his victims, he claimed it was manslaughter rather than murder because of some sort of loss of mental control. The jury clearly disbelieved him.
 
Back
Top