The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

ANOTHER Liar Republican lying about his credentials.

I'm also the self-appointed King of West Hollywood.

Correction: You are the Board Certified King of West Hollywood.

12373131383u1p2d.jpg
 
I love this guy. He gives new meaning to the term "Randroid." And I'm sure he calls himself "Rand" (instead of Randy or Randall) in honor of the detestable hack writer Ayn Rand.
 
And if anyone's wondering:

Asked what requirements [Rand's] National Board of Ophthalmology has for recertifying doctors, Paul's wife, Kelley, who is listed on forms as the group's vice president, said: "I'm not involved in that. I'm not officially talking about that today.'"

The American Board of Ophthalmology requires that doctors take 30 hours of continuing medical education classes each year, review 15 case files and pass a 150-item proctored test. The cost of recertification is about $1,500 every 10 years.

The state of Kentucky requires doctors to obtain 60 hours of continuing medical education over a three-year period -- one-third less than the American Board of Ophthalmology -- to keep their medical license.

[In contrast, Rand's] National Board of Ophthalmology doesn't maintain a website; its standards for certifying doctors and charges for certification couldn't be determined.

http://www.courier-journal.com/arti...tion-not-recognized-by-national-clearinghouse
 
And if anyone's wondering:

Asked what requirements [Rand's] National Board of Ophthalmology has for recertifying doctors, Paul's wife, Kelley, who is listed on forms as the group's vice president, said: "I'm not involved in that. I'm not officially talking about that today.'"

The American Board of Ophthalmology requires that doctors take 30 hours of continuing medical education classes each year, review 15 case files and pass a 150-item proctored test. The cost of recertification is about $1,500 every 10 years.

The state of Kentucky requires doctors to obtain 60 hours of continuing medical education over a three-year period -- one-third less than the American Board of Ophthalmology -- to keep their medical license.

[In contrast, Rand's] National Board of Ophthalmology doesn't maintain a website; its standards for certifying doctors and charges for certification couldn't be determined.

http://www.courier-journal.com/arti...tion-not-recognized-by-national-clearinghouse

So it's not only a made-up board, but a secret one?!?!? What bullshit. Sounds like the main requirement is "being Rand Paul."

Surprisingly, not all Libertarians are Randroid bozos, but this guy has the nose, the red wig, and the big floppy feet hidden in his closet.
 
Made-up and secret.

But why have your qualifications certified by disinterested professionals with a reputation to uphold, when you can just make up your own board and decide you really are all that.
 
here's a quaint little gem from Mr Paul....

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ0GHrcbsfE&feature=related[/ame]
 
Intentionally misleading thread title. Nowhere has he OP identified a "lie" told by Rand Paul as it relates to his profession. As has been cited by others, Paul is a doctor licensed to practice medicine. End of story.

Being certified by a group of your peers is nice, but it has nothing to do with your ability to practice medicine. End of story.
 
Being certified by a group of your peers is nice, but it has nothing to do with your ability to practice medicine. End of story.

Absolutely. You can be licensed without being board certified.

It's rather interesting, however, for someone to decide to make up his own board to certify himself, which presents an obvious conflict of interest. More interesting still for that board to not reveal its certification criteria or process.
 
It shows the nature of the candidate. He would rather not play by the rules of society.

I am more concerned about his positions, which are the real issue in an election.

He is insanely erratic, makes wild statements, and then blames others for his faults and mistakes.

He would fit in with the rest of the congressmen really well right now, if we the voters weren't fed up with the whole lot of them for THAT EXACT REASON.

jeeez.
 
It shows the nature of the candidate. He would rather not play by the rules of society.

I am more concerned about his positions, which are the real issue in an election.

I'm more concerned with the fact that someone who completely doesn't buy into the premise of our whole society wants to take a hand in running it. If he doesn't join the social contract he should NOT be allowed to take it over; only destruction can be his purpose.
 
Question: Do you know what boards, certifications, etc. that your physician and opthamologist belongs to or has been certified by?

Not all doctors belong to the AMA. The AMA has become more of a political organization in recent years.

Less than 1/3 of doctors belong to the AMA -- read your liberal article below.

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_doctors_revolt

This is pretty much a worthless thread. The mod's should end it.

Belongs is a gossip column.
 
HAha... one of their own caught lying and the conservatives are all running away, defending him and pretending that he's not lying.

Typical.

Dude, I'm not defending him. I doubt that I would even vote for him -- I didn't vote for his flakey father. If you look at his libertarian beliefs, you would find that those beliefs are more in line with liberal ideology than conservatism.

What I'm trying to do is spare you from further embarrassment about being uninformed.
 
If you look at his libertarian beliefs, you would find that those beliefs are more in line with liberal ideology than conservatism.

By the well-known conservative principle that since liberalism is bad, everything bad is liberal. Asinine.
 
Jack Springer, dear dear Jack Springer. The AMA does not provide board certification. The two are wholly unrelated.

And yes, I do know my physician is board certified. I make sure my repair people are certified - why wouldn't I do the same for my physician?
 
Oh.. I see... you're trying to SPARE me from pointing out that a Republican candidate said that he's board certified when he isn't.

Because it's embarrassing to ME.

Got it.

and any reasonable american that believes in standards would be with you

ohhh

thats's right. rebublicans have been in overdrive with the assistance of Bill clinton inthe nineties to make americans believe that regulations are bad because they are big gov't.

well I WANT a government that protects me and that includes regulations and licensing processes designed to make sure we don't have quacks as doctors, theives as brokers, and ecoterrorists as oil companies.

it was a great big republican lie and Clinton was a boob for letting it happen on his watch.

Big business is out of controll and since we have been stripped of our right to protect ourselves through regulations we are getting fucked right now. the repubs have gummed up the works so much that nothing can be done and then they have the stones to blame Obama for the decisions they made and their blocking him from changing it

its a show and the winner gets his pockets lined with big business money

disgusting
 
Back
Top