The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Antiviral drugs stop HIV spreading to sexual partners

dolphingunblade

On the Prowl
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Posts
54
Reaction score
0
Points
0
http://www.newscientist.com/article...gs-stop-hiv-spreading-to-sexual-partners.html
=======================================================


In a decisive breakthrough against the spread of HIV, an international study has demonstrated conclusively that antiretroviral therapy blocks the spread of HIV from an infected person to their uninfected partner.

The study, which was halted early because the results were so compelling, covered 13 countries and involved 1763 "discordant" couples, in which one partner carried the infection at the outset.

In 886 of the couples, the infected partner received antiretroviral drug therapy (ART) straight away, while treatment was delayed in the other 877 couples until the infected partner showed pre-defined signs of sickness.

Preliminary results, announced yesterday by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), showed that only one of the 886 individuals who received immediate treatment passed the virus to their partner. There were 27 cases of cross-infection in the 877 couples where treatment was delayed.

Faced with this 96 per cent reduction in risk, the study was halted between three and four years early so all of the couples could be treated.

HIV transmission

"This new finding convincingly demonstrates that treating the infected individual, and doing so sooner rather than later, can have a major impact on reducing HIV transmission," says Anthony Fauci, director of NIAID.

"This is a crucial development, because we know that sexual transmission accounts for about 80 per cent of all new infections," says Margaret Chan, director-general of the World Health Organization.

Called HPTN 052, the trial was led by Myron Cohen of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The results show that the treatment blocked transmission from either male or female partners, as there were equal numbers of both in the trial. Few gay couples were involved – just 3 per cent of those participating – so no knows yet whether the treatment would be equally effective for them.

All couples were counselled to continue their usual safe-sex practices, including use of condoms, to exclude this factor as a potential difference between the two groups.

To qualify for the trial, infected participants had to be at a relatively early stage of infection where CD4+ cells – the white blood cells targeted and depleted by HIV – were still moderately high, with counts of between 350 and 550 per millilitre of blood.

Developing countries

Current aid programmes aimed at spreading treatment to all developing countries typically wouldn't treat patients with CD4 counts this high. The count needs to fall below 350 before treatment begins – a strategy introduced by the WHO in 2009. But Cohen and his colleagues wanted to evaluate the potential for giving the drugs preventively in relatively healthy individuals, to see if it would help them avoid infecting their partners.

In the wake of the trial, the WHO will be under pressure to allow infected people with counts between 350 and 500 to qualify for treatment as part of a programme specifically aimed at preventing infection of partners.

The WHO will issue its new guidelines in July, and Chan said yesterday that "the findings from this study will further strengthen and support the new guidance that WHO is releasing in July to help people living with HIV protect their partners".

"We very strongly feel that treatment for prevention in this group must be an option they can choose," says Bernhard Schwartlander, director of evidence, strategy and results at UNAIDS.

"We know that ART very effectively suppresses the multiplication and level of virus in blood and mucosal cells, such as those lining the vagina, and we've already successfully applied this same principle for years in treatment to block mother-to-child transmission of HIV," says Schwartlander. "So if the prevention option is included in the guidelines in July, I think it would be a major step forward," he says.

The trial is the second this week to provide new hope against HIV, which has so far killed 30 million people with 33 million infections around the world. Earlier this week, a vaccine trial in monkeys produced the first conclusive evidence that a vaccine could completely suppress the virus, but it could take a decade to demonstrate whether the approach works in people
 
This has just got to be the best news that i have heard concerning hiv
in the last couple of years. Thanx for posting buddy am away to do some
homework . I know that i keep going on about this but please believe me
this will make it a little easier to look some of my patients in the eye,s thanx
again for such good news . (group):band:
 
It's very good news.

What they don't mention in the article though, is that 97% of the couples were heterosexual.
The study does not say what kind of sex the couples were engaging in either.
I'd assume that whether it was penetrative sex, anal, oral, would have some effect on the rate of transmission of the virus.
 
The study focused on heterosexual couples in Brazil, India, Thailand and sub-Saharan Africa.

The conclusion of the study is not that anti-retroviral drugs stopped HIV from spreading to sexual partners.

The conclusion of the study is that in heterosexual couples, when ART is started soon after infection, the less likely that HIV will be transmitted to the uninfected partner. It compared groups who received meds soon after infection versus those who delayed intitiation of therapy.

The non-medical press has focused upon the summary provided in the press release about the success of ART therapy, completely missing this paragraph:

..both groups received HIV-related care that included counseling on safe sex practices, free condoms, treatment for sexually transmitted infections...
 
Karabulut thanx for clearing that up but this was something that we
already knew , was it not?
Like if a nurse or phlembotomist suffers a needle-stick you put them on ARV,s
ASAP because we know that this cuts the risk signifantly.
As you mentioned the press choose to not print the whole articale which has
led to some confusion .
 
...but this was something that we already knew , was it not?

That's correct. We already knew that ART reduced the incidence of HIV transmission which is why it antiretrovirals are administered to pregnant women since it reduces the incidence of transmission of HIV to the fetus. And there are other studies that have examined discordant couples.

What this study did was take two groups of couples with CD4 counts over 350 - one group was given ART immediately and the other group did not get ART until the CD4 count dropped below 250. Both groups were given condoms and told about safe sex.

The study concluded that starting ART immediately helped reduce transmission of HIV when compared to the group who delayed ART.
 
The real take home message is that this study compared people who were diagnosed with HIV. You can't stop the spread of HIV unless people know they have it, so they have a reason to initiate ART. The only way to do that is to get tested regularly.
 
Back
Top