The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Any astronomy geeks? Problem in orbital dynamics

Another perspective here:

seven_sins said:
There is a real easy solution to unseen moon problem. The moon can be in any orbit that passes through the cone where it can't be seen. All that is required is that it stay in this cone for two weeks. We can make this happen by making the moon move slow enough. This will probably give the moon a huge orbital radius, but the size of the orbit is not a constraint.


Kulindahr said:
seven_sins said:
I ask a Ph.D. physicist your question. Here is his answer:

The part of the sky you see, at any instant, is the part above a plane, tangent to the earth, at your location. You see more of the sky than this, however, because the earth rotates. The part of the sky that you never see, though, is the volume within a cone whose sides are tangent to the earth at your latitude and whose apex is above the north pole. (From this cone you must exclude the small volume to the north of you.) The moon would have to stay in this volume for two weeks to remain unseen. If you are at 45 degrees north latitude then the cone is a right curcular cone.

Under these circumstances, an orbit that would keep the moon hidden for two weeks is one which carries the moon over both the north and south poles and whose period is eight weeks, about twice that of our moon. During the two weeks the moon is unseen, it would be inside this cone, south of the earth's South Pole. During these two weeks the moon would travel 90 degrees, a quarter of the way around the earth. The orbit would have to be 59% bigger than our moon's orbit, assuming the planet it orbited had the mass of earth. Any orbit larger than this would also work.

I hadn't even thought of a polar orbit!
 
Here is how to hide the moon:

Put it in geosynchronous orbit such that it orbits around earth's equator. Then put yourself on the side of the earth opposite the moon so that you can't see it. Since the orbital period of the moon equals the rotational period of the earth, you won't ever see the moon, even if you wait a million years.

Since the moon orbits the equator, it is always directly above the same point on earth. The huge tidal force it exerts on the earth due to its proximity won't change and the earth will come to equilibrium with it. If this did not happen, the changing tidal stresses would cause earth quakes and would heat the earth.

In geosynchronous orbit the moon would look ten times bigger than it does now. It would subtend 5 degrees.
 
Here is how to hide the moon:

Put it in geosynchronous orbit such that it orbits around earth's equator. Then put yourself on the side of the earth opposite the moon so that you can't see it. Since the orbital period of the moon equals the rotational period of the earth, you won't ever see the moon, even if you wait a million years.

Since the moon orbits the equator, it is always directly above the same point on earth. The huge tidal force it exerts on the earth due to its proximity won't change and the earth will come to equilibrium with it. If this did not happen, the changing tidal stresses would cause earth quakes and would heat the earth.

In geosynchronous orbit the moon would look ten times bigger than it does now. It would subtend 5 degrees.

I don't want a permanently hidden moon, I want one that didn't get seen for two weeks and then showed up. And I don't want one as big as Earth's moon, but one which while it looks bigger than our moon is actually closer, which means much smaller.

I really like the polar orbit bit that professor you know suggested. For kicks, I might use that, too, and have two exceptional moons in their sky!
 
You are all assuming that the moon isn't made of Dark Matter...

#retires into secret laboratory#

Well, since it can be seen, it by definition isn't made of dark matter.

Thus, it's not an assumption.

261.gif
 
A moon orbiting up and over the poles would not stay stationary in the sky, but rise and set as the planet rotates remember.

Yes, but as he said, if it were far enough out, there would be a 'cone of invisibility' that could last two weeks.

The big problem with the polar idea is that trying to keep track of where such a moon is, for story purposes, would drive me crazy.
 
Well, since it can be seen, it by definition isn't made of dark matter.

Thus, it's not an assumption.

261.gif

The moon could be made out of something that became visible when exposed to a certain other something (radiation, ion wind etc.) and then its visibility wouldn't be bound to a geostationary orbit.
 
The moon could be made out of something that became visible when exposed to a certain other something (radiation, ion wind etc.) and then its visibility wouldn't be bound to a geostationary orbit.

Whoa.
481.gif


My story may be science fiction, but that's really stretching things.... Just a moon in not-quite-geosynch is plenty strange.


I like the idea, though -- but maybe another story.
read.gif


001.gif
 
Whoa.
481.gif


My story may be science fiction, but that's really stretching things.... Just a moon in not-quite-geosynch is plenty strange.


I like the idea, though -- but maybe another story.
read.gif


001.gif

You are writing fiction.

One is made up just as much as the other.
What counts is internal consistency and believability.
 
Incredibly lame. :p

I looked it up.

It is incredibly lame -- unless you posit a black hole which for some reason gives off an astounding amount of Hawking radiation.


In my imagination, I thought maybe a brown hole was a piece missing from the universe, where a brown dwarf used to be......


1159.gif
 
It will change phase just like the moon. But eclipses, both solar and lunar, will be far more prevalent.


Eclipses should happen monthly if its orbit is in the plane of the ecliptic. And given that I've decided it shows a bigger disk than Luna, solar eclipses will be less spectacular.

I know the phases will look like those of the moon (duh). What I'm trying to picture is whether the phase during one night will be the same (I think so) and how the phases will progress over time.
 
Back
Top