The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • The Support & Advice forum is a no-flame zone.
    The members offering support and advice do so with the best intention. If you ask for advice, we don't require you to take the advice, but we do ask that you listen and give it consideration.

Anyone else label weary?

Me, they serve no purpose other than to cause hurt & pain.......
Move away from thinking labels define, and move on to understanding that labels suggest.

There's a big difference.

A "gay" label suggests (but does not guarantee) whether:
  1. Someone is dateable
  2. Someone is more likely to lend an ear if you're having gay relationship problems
  3. Someone has interests similar to yours
  4. You can be honest about your sexuality around him
  5. You have someone to commiserate with about gay marriage equality
etc., etc. A label is no guarantee of anything. But it still is immensely useful.
 
Me, they serve no purpose other than to cause hurt & pain.......

You know what, I like myself, I like my gay self, I like my Nancy boy, cock hungry queer self, I love my big, gay, faggot self.

No pain or hurt at all there. Nope, none at all.
 
Amen. After years of escorting and meeting men who are all over the map - geographically and metaphorically - labels seem more helpful to other people than to the labeled person. And, unfortunately, the label is used more to club a guy into a certain set of behaviors than to help illuminate his world in any way.
 
On the few occassions where I asked people whats their orientation, they made it too complicated. I just want to know if you like one, the other, or both. Anything else is toooo much information and I will ask for details if I'm interested. I rarely care enough to want to hear the extra information that some people force me to listen too.
(everyone is not as interesting as they think they are)
 
I have a very bad history with "labels." When I identified as straight, I worked so hard at denying my attractions to men that I made myself miserable. I actually suspect that the inner turmoil probably put off women, making my success with them close to zero. When I first had sex with a man, we became lovers, the first worthwhile relationship of my life. So I quickly identified as gay, which he happily encouraged. I was actually very threatened by the confusing fluidity of my desires. But I felt very weird inside, because I knew I was frequently attracted to women. (A little voice inside me said that I didn't react radically different to an attractive man or an attractive woman). But I thought that I had to live up to the label I had been assigned in life, and anyway those feelings weren't "real." Anyway no woman would want a man like me.

But those desires for women only grew over the years. And my desires for men, while not absent, eventually felt a little sated. I found myself turning into a lonely bachelor craving a woman's presence in my life. (Even though I had so little experience that I didn't even know what it would be like). All for the sake of a label. I found women creeping into my sexual fantasies; I found myself looking at straight porn more than gay porn. Finally, I found myself increasingly "falling" for some female friends. I eventually realized that even if there was only one bisexual man in the world, I was one, and that I just had to start dating women. That's what I'm doing now, and I'm having a ball. But I don't know how to explain my sexual history to them, and so I just gloss over it.

Why didn't I just call myself bisexual? Well, I thought that I had so little experience with women, that I had no right to. Plus I had a lot of bi-phobic baggage that I'm still dealing with:

-- That bisexual men are all really gay, and just fooling themselves.
-- That bisexual men give women AIDS. (I grew up in the 1980s). Once when I had sex with a "down-low" guy, I was terrified that he had given me a disease, even though we had been totally safe.
-- That bisexuals help the religious right, because they have a choice in their sexual behavior.
-- That bisexuality was just a "stage" men go through before becoming "gay." Where does that leave me?
-- That no woman would knowingly have a relationship with a bisexual man. (I'm still nervous about that, though I told my most recent GF, and she seemed OK with it).
-- That male bisexuality is incredibly rare, almost nonexistent. (Thank you, Dan Savage -- although he seems to have changed his ways lately). I told myself that there was no way I could be bisexual. I certainly didn't know any bisexuals. (Yes, I did. I'm quite certain that my late father was one).
-- That being bisexual means being 50-50 all the time. I've experienced my sexuality in all sorts of ways, but not usually 50-50. I've realized that I'm actually quite fluid over time.
-- That my desires for women came from not fully accepting my gay identity.
-- That bisexuals were really "out there," flakey, and bohemian. I'm an Eagle Scout.

As I said, I have a very bad history with "labels."
 
Back
Top