The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Apalling message I got on Adam4Adam

I'm going to step back from my original stance slightly. But only slightly.

I still don't think there's anything wrong with this guy's fetish, even if it's one I don't share in the slightest. I still don't think the guy was wrong to approach Sultan about it. However, he probably could have approached him in a bit more of an understanding manner. Surely this guy knows that most people don't share this fetish, and most people would be put off by such a request. If he had told Sultan "I'm looking for someone into scat play", that would've been ideal. Jumping straight to "I want to eat ur shit" sounds like he might have been getting off specifically on horrifying people.

Lex
 
This is what someone sent me.....


Hey what's up..wana come over? or me come to you? I love rimming a dude as he shits, rimming in genral (getting and giving). Armpits..... vers bottom... sucking....ver fisting....I wana eat ur shit as I rim u.....u game? - im free now until 630.. or after 11pm.. unlocked for you.. ht me up..




:cry:
I think I'm gonna puke! That is the sickest thing I've very heard of, and I can't begin to imagine the issues that dude is trying to work through. What would possess someone to even try something that disgusting?
 
Fuck that! It's not fair to call someone out for eating their boogers! Who are we to judge what they like to put in their mouth and eat?
There's a dude on TV that will virtually eat anything in the world, so I imagine he's tried a few scat burgers before. mmmm yum, numby numb!

Seriously, I'm really disappointed by your attitude in this thread. [-X
I will try to do better next time sir, and I'm sorry I let you down. Can you ever forgive me poopy tail?
e63251ef031c81ab5c5d65961a86a4c4.gif
 
I can't get with this thread. Eating your man's shit is not like eating chocolate syrup off your man's ass. I've seen plenty of users here get on guys who admit to going bareback, but immediatly defend someone's fetish of eating crap? Digesting feces can *sometimes* lead to the intake of bacteria (the bad kind) and viruses. To each his own....


funtv2.gif
 
^looks like it.

Times like these I wonder if reasons for a ban should be made public. No particular reason other than my curiosity, of course.

-d-
 
Making fun of someone's fetish in a public forum isn't funny.

I don't care what the fetish is.

So, you're disgusted. Move on. Be an adult.

Don't expect anyone to share their kinky side with you once they find out you pull stuff like this.

Enjoy your vanilla world.
Indeed.
Paedophilia is a fetish... You think people should ignore that as well?

Eating shit is disusting. Yes it's his fetish, but it doesn't stop it being vile.
 
What a weird thread. Some of you are actually arguing that it's unacceptable to be revolted by a scat fetish? I mean, I'm a live-and-let-live guy too, but it's not like anyone is saying the guy should be thrown in jail or something.
 
What a weird thread. Some of you are actually arguing that it's unacceptable to be revolted by a scat fetish?
That wasn't meant to be my point at all. It's anyone's right to be disgusted by something.
 
Why was the sultan banned? What did he do? He didn't seem like that bad of a guy to me. I actually thought he was kind of funny and sometimes had interesting things to say. I also enjoyed hearing things from his military perspective.
 
This is what someone sent me.....


Hey what's up..wana come over? or me come to you? I love rimming a dude as he shits, rimming in genral (getting and giving). Armpits..... vers bottom... sucking....ver fisting....I wana eat ur shit as I rim u.....u game? - im free now until 630.. or after 11pm.. unlocked for you.. ht me up..




:cry:

do-not-want-dog.jpg
 
^looks like it.

Times like these I wonder if reasons for a ban should be made public. No particular reason other than my curiosity, of course.

-d-
I second that motion, I'm nosey as hell, and a good piece of trashy gossip seemed to make coffee taste just that much better in the morning.

Why was the sultan banned? What did he do? He didn't seem like that bad of a guy to me. I actually thought he was kind of funny and sometimes had interesting things to say. I also enjoyed hearing things from his military perspective.
I think (and don't quote me on this but...) I think you can't talk about eating boogers in the Hot Topics forum. That stuff is posta be threaded in the Entertainment forum.

Question; is a ban irreversible if it's deemed he wasn't that bad a guy? Aside from the poop talk here he seemed like a quiet neighbor, always kept his lawn mowed...
 
I'm not sure where you are getting your definition of fetish, but the ones in the dictionary make no reference whatsoever to legal behavior vs. illegal, only that something is sexually stimulating.

We like to make distinctions in our minds, but the English language makes no such distinction, nor even connotative meaning.

Fetishes encompass legal and illegal activity, including murder, rape, and self-mutilation.

Differences of opinion about reactions are great, but we don't get to redefine terms for our argument's sake.
Where are you getting your definition? From the dictionary app on my iPad:
fet·ish [fet-ish, fee-tish]
-noun
1. an object regarded with awe as being the embodiment or habitation of a potent spirit or as having magical potency.
2. any object, idea, etc., eliciting unquestioning reverence, respect, or devotion: to make a fetish of high grades.
3. Psychol. any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation.
Also, fet·ich.
Origin: 1605–15; earlier fateish < Pg feitiço charm, sorcery (n.), artificial (adj.) < L factīcius factitious; r. fatisso, fetisso < Pg, as above
Every definition has the word 'object' in it. And it's easy to see why when you look at the etymology of the word: it's derived from 'artificial'.

What a weird thread. Some of you are actually arguing that it's unacceptable to be revolted by a scat fetish? I mean, I'm a live-and-let-live guy too, but it's not like anyone is saying the guy should be thrown in jail or something.
No, it's a bad idea to publicly decry a fetish that you're not interested in, in the same way it's bad manners for a straight person to decry homosexuality. Fetishes are "in the closet" nowadays the way that sexuality was 40 years ago.

You never know who among your friends is gay--or who has a fetish for "x".

Like I said earlier, gain someone's trust, and you'll find out some pretty amazing things about him. *|*
 
The American Psychiatric Association is considering changes to the DSM (click on the Rationale tab for a discussion) to no longer consider a fetish a disease.

In the new way of thinking, a fetish is only a problem if it causes long-term problems in one's life.

[1]*The Paraphilias Subworkgroup is proposing two broad changes that affect all or several of the paraphilia diagnoses, in addition to various amendments to specific diagnoses. The first broad change follows from our consensus that paraphilias are not*ipso facto*psychiatric disorders. We are proposing that the DSM-V make a distinction between paraphilias*and paraphilic*disorders. A paraphilia by itself would not automatically justify or require psychiatric intervention. A*paraphilic disorder*is a paraphilia that causes distress or impairment to the individual or harm to others. One would*ascertain*a paraphilia (according to the nature of the urges, fantasies, or behaviors) but*diagnose*a paraphilic disorder (on the basis of distress and impairment). In this conception, having a paraphilia would be a necessary but not a sufficient condition for having a paraphilic disorder.

This approach leaves intact the distinction between normative and non-normative sexual behavior, which could be important to researchers, but without automatically labeling non-normative sexual behavior as psychopathological. It also eliminates certain logical absurdities in the DSM-IV-TR. In that version, for example, a man cannot be classified as a transvestite—however much he cross-dresses and however sexually exciting that is to him—unless he is unhappy about this activity or impaired by it. This change in viewpoint would be reflected in the diagnostic criteria sets by the addition of the word “Disorder” to all the paraphilias. Thus, Sexual Sadism would become Sexual Sadism Disorder; Sexual Masochism would become Sexual Masochism Disorder, and so on.
 
I second that motion, I'm nosey as hell, and a good piece of trashy gossip seemed to make coffee taste just that much better in the morning.

Um... that's not what I thought I meant, until I read this and realised that it's in fact exactly what I meant. !oops! ..|

Question; is a ban irreversible if it's deemed he wasn't that bad a guy?

It might be a temporary ban. It shows up as banned regardless of temp or permanent, I think.

Hopefully it's a temporary one.
-d-
 
Um... that's not what I thought I meant, until I read this and realised that it's in fact exactly what I meant.

Tzu has a way of capturing the essence of things.

It shows up as banned regardless of temp or permanent, I think.

Yes, it does, going by the last two cases I know of, which were both just for a week.
 
Back
Top