mcbrion
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
- Posts
- 1,637
- Reaction score
- 33
- Points
- 38
Fortunately this question has an answer you can just look up.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/oct/19/gay-men-promiscuous-myth
Most gay men and most straight men share an equivalent appetite for sex, totalling out at 20 partners. Literally the same number for almost all men, gay or straight. There are a few over-achieving hypersexual aficionados of sex, with hundreds of partners, and they tend to be gay. So if you look at the gay average, it’s higher than straight men. But that’s only because we have a few guys making an extra effort for the team. 98% of gay men and 99% of straight men stop at no more than 20 partners.
That’s still a hell of a lot for how I work. I didn’t want 19 rejects before I found my guy. And I don’t understand wanting someone to be a stranger again after you liked him enough to sleep with him. I would be a far better candidate for some polyamorous sex commune than a bunch of one-time hookups or some serial monogamy thing. If a guy is okay sleeping with more than one person in his life, he should be willing to do it all at once.
Anyway yeah gay men and straight men are mostly the same. We tend to be more enthusiastic and honest about sex than women. Even me, after 20 years with the first and only guy to get me off, and never figured out hook-ups to save my life, I actually like sex. It’s one of those things like “what would you do if you won the lottery?” -more sex! “What do you suggest for a weekend get-away, sex or kayaking or visiting a history museu—“ SEX! And do you enjoy “making love” or “fucking” your man? Both! Sometimes it’s nice to be intimate and sometimes it’s nice to just get off on each other.
A lot of women don’t seem to enjoy sex, or they think they’re doing a favour or enduring a chore or that it’s really ALWAYS about something else other than physical pleasure with someone you enjoy.
Oh, and just for the fun of it, there was also a "study" done back in 1977 (or was it 78) about how many partners the "average" gay man had. It was stated that the average gay man had 500 (yes, you read that right. 5.0.0) sex partners, which just goes to show why it was also called the "swingin' seventies."
So, Ok Cupid's fine if you're a Millennial, but for the first "out" gay generation, it seemed to be "lemme at 'em!!!"
It sure showed up in the huge number of AIDS cases in the 80s... You didn't see straights getting it remotely as much. That's why AIDS was named 'The Gay Disease." The extremely homophobic Black community had the stupidity to call it "The White Man's Disease." Fortunately, my mother - a strong personality (like me) went around telling people that her son was gay (that would be me!) and I wasn't white (well, partially white, but that's beside the point).
There's a lot of history that younger writers/journalists only know by the stories they read: they weren't actually THERE, just like most people weren't in San Francisco when Harvey Milk was assassinated. And then there are those of us who lived through those times, we KNOW how promiscuous guys were in SF (AND LA) and some of us lived in SF and remember when Harvey was murdered. I don't need to read stories about anything that happened in San Francisco in the 70s, 80s, 90s or up to 2002. I saw it, read it or reported on it when it happened.
So, points to OK Cupid, whose target audience is..what, 21 - 38? Not exactly a sweeping survey. AND, only conducted in North America. (read the fine print). I suppose, as a former reporter, I'd want to examine the questions asked very closely. But us (former) reporters were much more investigative about our stories.
I'm open to rebuttal, especially from someone in my age group (60-80). Maybe I'm off the mark. But I really doubt it.


