- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
- Posts
- 22,224
- Reaction score
- 110
- Points
- 63
Another example is when somebody talks about "an opera." OPUS is the singular, and "operas" is really a plural of a plural. But, like PEOPLE, it has been fully adopted in contemporary usage, and thus is considered to be proper.people think the plural of "person" is "people". It's "persons". People should be a collective singular noun with "peoples" as its plural form but tautology changed that overtime. Another similar example is "data". Data is also a plural noun [in Latin] and the singular form is "datum".
Persons, though, is indeed used as the plural in most Legalese. I may say "persons" instead of "people," also, when I want to refer to "multiple individuals, each of whom have their own personalities" instead of only saying "society" or "a crowd" or "a group of some size."
So, basically I guess I think of "persons" as being a more formal word.
Before my time, too, and I think I'm considerably older than you. Probably even before my grandparents' time.The plural of "person" being "people" passed into standard usage before my time, thus it is congenial and constant and a barometer of correct English, and to revert to "persons" and "peoples" is poncing nonsense that grates on the ears. Hideous affectations.

