The more I read the posts on this subject the more I am convinced that what is needed is for those who encounter Christians who make them feel rejected is for them to cast their net much wider. There are millions of Christians who know better than to judge you on the basis of your sexual orientation. There are also millions of Christians who are ready to help you to appreciate that the gospel is good news for you wherever you may be on your life journey.
Most excellently said!
On that level, here's a fair test: if a Christian who learns your gay responds first with a hug and a sharing of compassion for the way you get treated, you're likely to be in good company; it the first response is, "OMG that's a sin!", follow the advice Jesus gave to the disciples concerning places that wouldn't listen to them -- wipe even the dust of that encounter from your feet, and get out of there!
There are of course those who read their Bible in a nitpicking sort of way--they seem to delight in finding something in that great book which excludes some from enjoying fellowship, forgetting that the dominant message of Christianity is that Christ has done away with that which separates us from one another and from our God. Even in the earliest Christian preaching, and certainly in the teachings of Jesus there is a heavy emphasis on the importance of the forgiveness of sin since we all fall short of the commandment to love God with heart, soul, and mind, and none of us have good records with regard to our duty to love others as we love ourselves. (I can, and I'm very sure that others can think of sins which are more harmful to more people than the sin which comes into being by reason of the misuse of our God-given sexuality) The Good News is that no one is outside God's mercy. You are welcome just as you are and anyone who tells you otherwise is perverting the intentions of God as we Christians have come to understand them through the teachings of Jesus Christ.
"Nitpicking" -- you're more polite than I would be!
Christians often fall neatly into two categories, when they encounter people engaged in what they see as horrible sin:
1. Come on in!
2. Get the fuck outa here!
Jesus said "Come to Me, all..."
Anyone who is on the "GTFOH" trip doesn't know who Jesus is in the first place; they're afraid sin might stick to them and make them dirty. That ended when the whole "unclean" business ended, which it did because Jesus is greater than sin... so if they're sweating over how evil you are, and how horrid your sin is, or whatever, they just plain don't know Jesus.
The vilest people in public opinion in Jesus' day were the tax collectors and prostitutes. Today, they're gays and "sex offenders", who are often lumped together. Back then, Jesus joined the tax collectors and prostitutes at dinner, and welcomed them with embraces -- and He does the same thing today with our time's pariahs.
So if you're not getting met with dinner invitations and hugs, it isn't Jesus you're encountering.
Most Christians that I know do not suggest that everything in the Bible is to be taken as the very Word of God. When the Bible is read in my church the reader always prefaces the reading with: "Listen for the Word of God in...." and there are large portions of the Bible which are never read for the simple reason that no one today seriously suggests that there is even a hint of a message from our Creator in many parts of the Bible. We take the Bible seriously, but never literally.
If "being gay and raised Christian sucks" for you, I would suggest that you find some person who was raised Christian and is gay and is happy being both gay and Christian.
If they really believe what you say, I worry for them. The entire Bible is to be taken as the very word of God; the question is how it is to be understood. Obviously, taking something like the statement "There is no God!" out of context leads you to a wrong place; so also does taking things like not eating shellfish -- because in context, all the commands about the details of everyday life that were given to the ancient Hebrews no longer apply -- period.
But they're right to not take great portions of it literally, because they weren't written to be taken that way -- indeed, if you could successfully communicate the concept to an ancient Hebrew, you'd probably get a blank look when you managed to ask what parts of the Bible that pertains to, because it's an alien way of thought to the culture the Bible rose through. There are parts we can get away with taking literally, but only because what they are is close enough to that, that to do so is safe.
And even what was to be taken "literally" back then may not be so now, as illustrated with the item of ancient commands -- which weren't "commands" in the sense we understand them, in the first place: back in their day, the instruction to not mix meat and dairy in food was to be taken literally, because it did in fact mean that they weren't to do that, but today it is to be taken as an example of a way on which God instructs His people, not as an instruction for us to follow as it stands. It's a measure of the ignorance of people like the Phelps clan that they can picket against gays, but not warn America that it is aimed at destruction because of the abomination of a Big Mac, or picket clothing stores because of the abomination of mixing two types of fiber in a garment, or picket grocery stores because of the abomination of having shellfish as food.
"Love one another, as I have loved you", was the one truly new thing Jesus taught; all the rest comes from the Old Testament. When you meet a Christian who is ready to die for you,
as you are, without demanding you change first, then you've met someone to listen to.