The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Benghazi was nothing more than a witch hunt says NYT

The Lord is my Palbert, I shall not want...

Especially when he makes me lie down in that damn green pasture....

But at least my rod and staff comforted me...... twice. That's why my cup runneth over.
 
And unto you a Child shall be born

Yeah but then Opin, Rareboy and Eden will have to get off their duffs and make some long-ass dusty trek to leave some questionable perfume products at the abandoned industrial facility where the impoverished CowboyBob laid down to go into labor after he got bumped off Obamacare.
 
Yeah but then Opin, Rareboy and Eden will have to get off their duffs and make some long-ass dusty trek to leave some questionable perfume products at the abandoned industrial facility where the impoverished CowboyBob laid down to go into labor after he got bumped off Obamacare.

The Son of palbert...

 
NYT is more partisan than Fox and on a par with MSNBC.
 
Hillary has A LOT more skeletons in her closet than Benghazi of course that is from a leftist perspective and the right can't bash her Wall St. ties because their own hands are in that honey jar too, much worse than Hillary. Why Democrats want to elect another neo-liberal is beyond me.
 
Hillary has A LOT more skeletons in her closet than Benghazi of course that is from a leftist perspective and the right can't bash her Wall St. ties because their own hands are in that honey jar too, much worse than Hillary. Why Democrats want to elect another neo-liberal is beyond me.

Because unlike small niche political parties with no national power, we have to compromise what we want with what can stand to win a national election, and not just our personal pet picks. Hillary probably wouldn't be in my personal top 5 or possibly even 10 list if it were just up to me personally. But the ones who'd be ahead of her on the list are too leftist for 50.1% of America to vote for.
 
^Kirsten Gillibrand would be far better than Hillary Clinton. It's the "dinosaurs" of the Democratic Party and the "liberal" Wall St. elite touting Hillary when there are far better candidates out there for Democrats.

Most just want to see the Clintons like the Bushs, go away!
 
Hillary has A LOT more skeletons in her closet than Benghazi of course that is from a leftist perspective and the right can't bash her Wall St. ties because their own hands are in that honey jar too, much worse than Hillary. Why Democrats want to elect another neo-liberal is beyond me.
I want everyone to keep this under your hats: I grew up in Ms. Clinton's school district and rumor has it that when young Hillary Rodham was in the fifth grade, she put a whoopie cushion on her teacher's chair Shhhhhh. :eek:

There's no end to her treachery!
 
I want everyone to keep this under your hats: I grew up in Ms. Clinton's school district and rumor has it that when young Hillary Rodham was in the fifth grade, she put a whoopie cushion on her teacher's chair Shhhhhh. :eek:

There's no end to her treachery!

This was before she murdered Vince Foster and dealt drugs out of the White House.




BENGHAZI!
 
I want everyone to keep this under your hats: I grew up in Ms. Clinton's school district and rumor has it that when young Hillary Rodham was in the fifth grade, she put a whoopie cushion on her teacher's chair Shhhhhh. :eek:

There's no end to her treachery!

She's a Wellesley dyke. There is no end to her treachery!
 
^Kirsten Gillibrand would be far better than Hillary Clinton. It's the "dinosaurs" of the Democratic Party and the "liberal" Wall St. elite touting Hillary when there are far better candidates out there for Democrats.

Most just want to see the Clintons like the Bushs, go away!

I don't know if that's the case so much as Hillary is out touting Hillary and few other people have the name recognition or portfolio to knock her out of a seeming default choice. Hillary's been angling for this for many years and is very well known. It's always possible for someone like Obama to rise from the junior ranks of the party and suddenly gain mainstream momentum, Obama himself proved that. But that would be a variable we couldn't really predict at this point.
 
It doesn't matter what they conclude though because if Hillary does run in 2016 they will dust it off and we will hear about FOUR DEAD AMERICANS 'til our ears start to bleed
Time to dust off Monica Lewinsky, too. Of course that wasn't Hillary's involvement and that scandal was rather noxious to her, but the stupid base will fall for anything and associate Monica Lewinsky with Hillary. I mean, a noticeable percentage of Republicans blame Obama's second term on funding and corruption from ACORN...which has been GONE for nearly five years.

WHITEWATER!!!!!!!!!!!

If Hillary runs we are going to hear about it again, and again, and again. That's simply how they operate and they can't operate any other way. They can't WIN any other way either.
Didn't she do some kind of fast commodities trade where she came out (gasp) $100,000 ahead? No matter that it was a generation ago.

Maybe I'd better STFU, because I'm giving the RNC ideas, and they know they may get away with even the most preposterous and stupid conspiracy theories.

When they start blaming NineOneOne on Obama (I've HEARD this...somewhere!), you know they have an infinite amount of shit to throw at infinite numbers of walls, in hopes SOME of it sticks. The rest of it stinks.
 
Back
Top