The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Biden Scolds Dem Rivals on Fox Debates

“The candidates that can’t face Fox, can’t face Al Qaeda,” said Mr. Ailes. “And that’s what’s coming.”

I wouldn't have equated Fox News with a terrorist organization, but who knows better than Roger Ailes?
 
Well it is a fact that New Haven County is very Liberal & Democrat,as Kenny says.
There is a big difference between Fairfield & the rest of the state.

This is the rest of the state.http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/21076

"
Feds arrest dozens of illegal immigrants in New Haven raids


Andrew Mangino
Staff Reporter
var bnum=new Number(Math.floor(99999999 * Math.random())+1); document.write(''); http://servedby.advertising.com/cli...3117463912,723991^459826^87^0,1_/bnum=1666944
adlog.php


The Department of Homeland Security conducted an early morning raid of undocumented immigrants in New Haven on Wednesday, arresting dozens and prompting city officials to decry what they believe to be federal retaliation for city’s approval Monday of the first-in-the-nation municipal ID program.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents made 29 arrests Wednesday, according to a spokeswoman for the agency, and city officials said they expect more arrests over the course of the next two weeks. The officials described it as the first-ever mass arrest of illegal immigrants in recent New Haven history, but the ICE spokeswoman says the arrests are not politically driven and are “routine.”
New Haven Mayor John DeStefano Jr., who will be holding a press conference to discuss the arrests later this afternoon, says the federal government arbitrarily targeted New Haven immigrants in response to the Board of Aldermen’s approval of municipal ID cards. The ID cards will be available to all city residents, regardless of their citizenship status, and will allow cardholders to access basic city services and protections.
“We feel that this is too much to be a coincidence, this is a retaliation,” said Jessica Mayorga, DeStefano’s spokeswoman, who called the events a “very big surprise.” “They are attacking us because they failed to integrate immigration reform that worked. That’s not our fault, and we’re doing everything we can to protect the immigrants of New Haven.”
Mayorga said the mayor has not yet devised a response to the events, as the more immediately pressing concern now is the children who will come home to find that their parents have been arrested. Those detained will likely be sent out of state, and a team from Yale Law School has already agreed to represent them.
But Paula Grenier, a spokeswoman for the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office, said Wednesday’s arrests were nothing out of the ordinary, and she denied any connection between the approval of the ID program and the raids.
“Our Fugitive Operations Team was out today and in New Haven and did make some arrests, but again these are specific arrests,” she said, adding that there are over 20,000 such arrests made throughout the country each year.
She said she did not have records available as to when the last arrest was made in New Haven.
During discussions of the ID program, aldermen expressed some concern that the Department of Homeland Security at some point might subpoena the program’s records, but there was little if any discussion of a possible retaliation by immigration enforcement, especially before the ID cards were put into place.
Ward 1 Alderman Nick Shalek said “everybody is very surprised” by the arrests, which took place in the Fair Haven neighborhood.
“I’m still in favor of the Municipal ID program and practical efforts to make the city a safer place for all its residents, undocumented and otherwise,” Shalek said. “To the extent the raids are in retaliation to the city’s actions, I am severely disappointed and distraught.”
Shalek said he has received dozens of e-mails from students in what he called the largest outpouring of student interest in a political issue that he has witnessed as an alderman.
The ID program was approved Monday by a vote of 25-1, with the dissent coming from the only Republican on the Board, Ward 18 Alderwoman Arlene DePino. Hundreds of undocumented immigrants have descended on City Hall in recent weeks to show their support for the card program. But many aldermen have said that they have also received a barrage of e-mails decrying the plan as a deliberate circumvention of federal law.
Board of Aldermen President Carl Goldfield could not be reached for comment Wednesday afternoon.
 

I get it now

thanks for explaining

the idea that boycotting is ok and perhaps useful is true

blacks boycotting a company's products if the company is proven to be discriminating

or something like that

it is a show of economic power designed to hurt an entity that is doing wrong

that is not the case with Fox News
they are just doing something different
very different from the standard liberal and extreme liberal media
in comparision, they appear unreasonable
that's because the "bar" is absurdly left

as for smelter - who attempts to diminish the acts of Biden and Kucinich - how unsmelter of you - so Biden is going on Fox because he is irrelevant? because his poll #s are low? - I take that back - it is smelterish - the cynicism

we should get diapers and rattles for the dem candidates who boycott
maybe some similac too
and some booties in case their feetsies get cold
maybe some strollers to push them around on the campaign trail
or a blankie for each
I'll spare you more baby analogies - cause I know it's tough being in the 80 - when u know u haven't a leg to stand on - but u keep going anyway

I admire ur ......................

can't think of anything
 
You get an "A" in ignorance.

The majority of richie riches in Greenwich, Danbury and Stamford --and the rest of Fairfield County-- are liberals. Ned Lamont is a richie rich from Greenwich, and he carried that territory last year.

Lieberman won because Republicans --including the BushRepublican losers in Groton-- voted for Lieberman. Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity both endorsed him.


SO CT is a Republican state? Holy shit. In so much that they can willingly overturn democratic willpower.

CHeck out who gave what in the campaigns pocketbooks

Seems that Joe garnered 60 percent of the cash from Greenwich alone. If you include payments from citizens of NYC (who live in greenwich lets be real) then Joe had 80 percent of the cash. Money is intent in our political system.

A graphical display for visual guys:
instate_img.asp


Looks like a whole lot bigger difference in intent when you see the whole state not just Greenwich and NYC.



Lets look at the votes:

FROM CNN:
I wonder why CNN reported that Lieber took Fairfield County by almost 20 percent of the vote over Lamont?

Fairfield
Updated: 11:15 a.m. ET
Lieberman
12,158 55%

Lamont
8,041 36%

100% of precincts reporting

He actually did worse amongst the ignorant BUSHREPUBLICANS of Groton. Somewhere right around 14 percent better than Lamont but nothin like Fairfield.

Must be CNN is biased.

It sucks being wrong but you must be so damn used to it by now after so many harsh years of living.
 
Just in the NICK of time we find out who goes with facts and who is rolling with smack
 
SO CT is a Republican state?

Nope.

That's not what I said.

Why mischaracterize my words?


Money is intent in our political system.

A lot of citizens who don't contribute money to campaigns actually have opinions.



You're right, Lieberman took every county over Lamont in the general election.

That count, however, does not break down whether it was Republicans or Democrats voting for Lieberman, and the fact that Lieberman LOST the Democratic Primary to Lamont would indicate that Connecticut Democrats --including the richie rich Democrats-- voted for Lamont while Republicans --including THEIR richie riches-- carried Lieberman to victory.

But in any case I was wrong about Lamont carrying Greenwich and stand corrected.


It sucks being wrong but you must be so damn used to it by now after so many harsh years of living.

Sure I'm used to being wrong. It's not all that awful.

What's awful is being unable to accept it, admit it, and not learning from it.
 
Nope.

That's not what I said.

Why mischaracterize my words?

No shit huh? The rest of it says because the Republicans musta overturned your DEM desire for LA-fucking-Mont, again use intelligence to work your way through things or call a friend. I realize sarcasm is out of the question for any DEMS SORRY. By the way by only taking a snip of a someones sentence and making it fit your needs is the actual mischaracterization<sic>


A lot of citizens who don't contribute money to campaigns actually have opinions.

Yeah but like their pocketbooks they are usually empty when it actually comes time to go all the way down to the voting booth. Basically LAZY, but if you pay then you play.

You're right, Lieberman took every county over Lamont in the general election.

That count, however, does not break down whether it was Republicans or Democrats voting for Lieberman, and the fact that Lieberman LOST the Democratic Primary to Lamont would indicate that Connecticut Democrats --including the richie rich Democrats-- voted for Lamont while Republicans --including THEIR richie riches-- carried Lieberman to victory.

I said no other thing you merely contradicted reality. You will also find in the links provided the ASS vs elephant breakdown and you are right Republicans overwhelmingly voted Lieberman. WHy because he is for the war. He is for America. And we evil republicans can deal with a entitled Dem as long as they have two nuts swinging.

But in any case I was wrong about Lamont carrying Greenwich and stand corrected.




Sure I'm used to being wrong. It's not all that awful.

What's awful is being unable to accept it, admit it, and not learning from it.

Jeesh I dunno who it is your referring but for me I would accept my mistakes, except I don't make many.

.

I imagine I was wrong to take what you said as based in reality before, I shall correct that in the future.

258606.jpg
 
I caught this today, and thought about this thread:

From the Letters section of the Dallas Morning News dated Thursday June 7, 2007.

No wonder they boycott


Re: "Scarier than al-Qaeda?" by John F. Zorn, Monday Letters.
Using another analogy as inane as Mr. Zorn's linking a choice by politicians not to appear on Fox with their ability to deal with international situations, let me ask:

Why would famed chefs not gather at a McDonald's drive-in window to discuss recipes with the burger-flipper? Answer: The location stinks, and he's not a chef.

Fox is not a news channel; Brit Hume is not a journalist.

H.M., Dallas

Makes sense to me! (!)



Best analogy I've heard so far! :D

I haven't really heard any "sports analogies" so I really wouldn't know. !oops!
 
MSNBC.....We Report....You decide....not to watch.....

sorry...coudn't resist....:)

Next time ur watching Keith O - blink ur eyes ..........

He's just like Mitt Romney - that fucking hair

it's him

nah - Mitt's probably better looking

But Keith styles his hair after Mitt

he's got a Mitt crush

ck it
 
LOL......I rarely watch him......I usually split time between Fox and CNN...along with online news....

Fox is a lot more fair and balanced then their given credit for.I could provide many examples...but it won't matter to the 80 here....so I don't bother....

PLEASE! Really!
 
clearly ur not looking hard enough

Actually, I'm not looking at all. :lol:

If you'll go back and re-read my post, you might discover that I resurrectced your thread because "someone else" said something that I wished I had said. :rotflmao:

But hey! I'm just a "Moderator" and I really no longer have a "voice" here, I'm just supposed to baby-sit, and make sure that everyone's "feetsies" are comfortable. :cool:
 
Actually, I'm not looking at all. :lol:

If you'll go back and re-read my post, you might discover that I resurrectced your thread because "someone else" said something that I wished I had said. :rotflmao:

But hey! I'm just a "Moderator" and I really no longer have a "voice" here, I'm just supposed to baby-sit, and make sure that everyone's "feetsies" are comfortable. :cool:


why does my bottom hurt?

did I just get spanked?

or

:=D:
 
Back
Top