The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Bisexual guys are the hottest

slnattak

Sex God
Joined
Sep 8, 2004
Posts
881
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Bisexual guys are the hottest fucks. Both gay guys and straight guys can't hold a candle to these guys.

Pure sex has always been genderless, let's face it. Bisexual guys have always touched me the most erotically, and we have the most chemistry. (both sexual and romantic) I've been around the few blocks, and I think I finally am coming to terms with my true preference. And I think society would agree with me.

Gay men are bad lays because they're 'too much in their heads' and try to philosophize gay sex. So they end up being rigid and uptight or too aggressive, it doesn't feel good. Or the talk too much. (annoying) They also try too hard sometimes to be hot but it doesn't have an organic/natural feel to it. They try to see something that isn't there way too soon.

And real straight guys are just as bad. There's like no sexual attraction because my body and 'male' side does not turn them on at all. So they end up being pretty selfish. They also have waaaay too much ego get in the way, and do the same kind of 'try too hard' shit that gay guys do. And it's just not attractive in real life. They're just as rigid and uptight as gay guys, when good sex requires one to be open and malleable as much as possible.

You can rant and rave and disagree with me all you want, but science later will discover the truth to these statements, and the 'straight male' fascination will gain further perspective. There's never so such thing as 100% gay or straight, pussy was specifically designed to turn a man on, and so was cock. Once people realize that, even the bisexual label will dissolve, and we can then finally gain relationships based on people, not on gender.

When one identifies or over labels their sexuality, they end up suffering from some sort of visualization disorder. They are unable to differentiate or understand the difference with what looks good between what feels good.
 
you wrote a lot on a post but i don't really know what you are saying.
 
You really need to research your queer theory and identity politics more, you're kind of on the right track, but its not just going to happen like you think it is. People arent just going to go "OH 'pussy was specifically designed to turn a man on, and so was cock', I'm malleable now", there is indispensable political capital in labeling sexuality.
 
Bisexual guys are the hottest fucks. Both gay guys and straight guys can't hold a candle to these guys.

Pure sex has always been genderless, let's face it. Bisexual guys have always touched me the most erotically, and we have the most chemistry. (both sexual and romantic) I've been around the few blocks, and I think I finally am coming to terms with my true preference. And I think society would agree with me.

Gay men are bad lays because they're 'too much in their heads' and try to philosophize gay sex. So they end up being rigid and uptight or too aggressive, it doesn't feel good. Or the talk too much. (annoying) They also try too hard sometimes to be hot but it doesn't have an organic/natural feel to it. They try to see something that isn't there way too soon.

And real straight guys are just as bad. There's like no sexual attraction because my body and 'male' side does not turn them on at all. So they end up being pretty selfish. They also have waaaay too much ego get in the way, and do the same kind of 'try too hard' shit that gay guys do. And it's just not attractive in real life. They're just as rigid and uptight as gay guys, when good sex requires one to be open and malleable as much as possible.

You can rant and rave and disagree with me all you want, but science later will discover the truth to these statements, and the 'straight male' fascination will gain further perspective. There's never so such thing as 100% gay or straight, pussy was specifically designed to turn a man on, and so was cock. Once people realize that, even the bisexual label will dissolve, and we can then finally gain relationships based on people, not on gender.

When one identifies or over labels their sexuality, they end up suffering from some sort of visualization disorder. They are unable to differentiate or understand the difference with what looks good between what feels good.

I generally try to come with a coherent response. However, all I can say to this post is WTF???
 
Your point is there, but it's logic is weak and flawed. The statement you made, "pure sex has always been genderless," is retarded because sex is fundamentally gender driven. Bisexuality does not hold advantage over other sexualities in it's "free thinking" as you propose, any sexuality is capable of this, it depends on the individual, character, and their individual ideas concerning sexuality. I'm glad you're one of those people who think that sexuality should not be limiting and that sex is an act one should be ultimately free to enjoy, and there are many other's out there who think like you, but are not limiting it to just bisexuals. You are guilty of being bias based on your preference and experience, and ultimately the opponent of the "sexual openness" that you advocate by thinking in the same mode as the characters you described in your post by condemning the failures (preconceived, and immaturely, on your part) of the other sexualities. I wonder just how "malleable" you are when it seems to me that you are the one here limiting yourself. It seems to me you're the one who "talks to much (annoyingly)" and also have "waaaay too much ego get in the way" while you tried to prove your point. Don't try to back up your stupidity with the science that will ultimately tear your argument down to nothing, it's misguided. There will never be a dissolving of sexuality because it biologically, and therefore, scientifically, ensured. However, hopefully, there will be a dissolving of the ignorance one continues to hear, and ignorance is the only true obstacle standing in the way of your utopia, but I'll say that has about as much chance as the dissolution of sexuality and your idiocy. "When one identifies or over labels their sexuality, they end up suffering from some sort of visualization disorder. They are unable to differentiate or understand the difference with what looks good between what feels good." - You, sir, are as guilty as you charge.
 
I agree, thought I had a clue to what you were saying but when I tried to put it into words, I just had to say "What the f***????"

You are only allowing for three categories here. You are gay so you must be agressive and looking to dominate your partner, you are straight so you must be confused since you are having sex with a guy or you are bisexual and juuuust right!

That is fundementally flawed. I'm bisexual because I like pussy but have a desire for cock from time to time. I don't think I could ever love a man but fall in love too easily with women. Sex with a man is not the same as with a woman, with a woman I feel emotion and attachment as well as a strong need to make her happy but with a man, it is carnal lust. I could give a guy a blowjob today and kick his ass tomorrow without hesitation if he deserves it.

In the end it does not matter what you are but what you are looking for. If I'm gay and looking for love, I'll treat you much better than if I'm bisexual and just looking to bust a nut. Men do the same thing to women all the time. I had sex with this girl once and when she woke up in my arms the next morning, she expressed surprise. Told me all the other guys where usually gone by morning. When she started going through my house and telling me where she could put her furniture, I stopped seeing her.

I think that is more along the lines of what you are trying to say.

Me personally, I'll tell you up front what I expect and if you don't like it, there are four other guys waiting in my inbox. :sex:
 
I predict, at least in secular societies like UK and OZ, a breaking down of all this.

I recently saw, in my regional city of northern Australia, a team of young football players, out on the town, tongue-kissing each other, hands on each others' legs, playing sex acts with each other, and getting nude, all in front of all the other patrons at the bar.

I bet, in 5-10 years' time, a website like JUB will be redundant.

Young people are becoming increasingly ambisexaul and un-judgemental.

Hooray for that!
 
I predict, at least in secular societies like UK and OZ, a breaking down of all this.
Young people are becoming increasingly ambisexaul and un-judgemental.
Hooray for that!

I admire your youthful optimism, Paliden, and I mean no offense, but lets be realistic. Those collage dudes were partying and under the influence. They were letting off steam by throwing constrants and boundaries out the window. When they sober up and get back into the real world, they will have forgotten all about their night before gayety. Having been in Viet Nam, I can tell you that the fellas got very sloppy with each other at beer parties and at the club. Kissing, necking and the like. The next day it was all forgotten and never mentioned. For those intrested, there is some thing in US army regulations concerning homo behavior under the influence and in a combat zone that forbids court marshal.
 
Back
Top