The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Bring On The Crazies: The GOP's Kooky Problem

Suggestion Alfie!

Why the fuck won't Obama just release a copy of his original birth certificate and clear this mess up?


I am so fucking sick of both sides of this thing.
 
"Libertarian" is just a cop out. They are people that don't want to associate with the riff raff in the Democratic Party or the Federalism of the Dems. Naturally they don't want to be associated with either the Republican loons or the few realistic ideas the Republicans advance.

Oh Dear! What to do? Voila, call yourself a libertarian! Libertarians don't have to take responsibility for anything or anybody and can remain in a phony superior position above them all. One need only to pay a little lip service to totally unrealistic ideals, discuss crazy Ayn Rand and nod approvingly the goofiness of the old con artist Ron Paul.

It's no different than getting a bogus medical deferment in time of war - you don't want to go to war and don't want to take the responsibility of opposing a popular war, so you fake a medical condition - that's libertarianism. (of course by that definition many Republicans are "libertarians")

It's just such Bullshit.
 
If I were Obama I wouldn't release it either because it makes his critics look outlandish. It is as if they kept asking for him to produce a sample of his own poo because they heard it contains emeralds. i.e. distasteful, improbable, and freakin looney. If I were Obama I would want my opponents to look like that for as long as possible.
 
By the way, conservatism is a British phenomenon which has spread around the world, and does not get to be redefined by Americans. While we're at it, the rest of the world would like you to know that red=socialist-ic-ish and blue=conservative, so you have all of your "red" and "blue" states ass-backwards. Libertarians, which are not conservatives, don't get a colour because that would be too "together-y" and it creeps them out.

Anyway, this red-states blue-states thing is like showing up at a football game and being the only one talking ice skating. Get with the program.
 
By the way, conservatism is a British phenomenon which has spread around the world, and does not get to be redefined by Americans. While we're at it, the rest of the world would like you to know that red=socialist-ic-ish and blue=conservative, so you have all of your "red" and "blue" states ass-backwards. It is like showing up at a football game and being the only one talking ice skating. Get with the program.

Limey bastard. All that matters, is in Texas!!!
 
Neither does mine.

If I had to pick a face that resembled my penis:

6a00e54ee9b9ef8833010536e58b13970c-500wi

Lol - tall dark handsome and uncut I take it.
 
Oh dear. I'm saying "Nice doggie" while I search for a stick.



Liberals didn't support ANYTHING he did. You supported SOME of the things he did -- you said so:



Further, Sir, you seem to have supported Cheney -- certainly you had affection for him. You wrote:



Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case: you are a Republican.


Oh I don't support Cheney, I just don't think he's as evil and malevolent as some make him out to be. He was misguided, didn't understand the role of the Vice President, and I think had an unfair weight in decision-making, but I don't think he was actively crafting a plan to take over the world and controlling Bush. (like the wizard in the wizard of oz) I think that gives him too much credit for Bush's mistakes.

As for Bush; the ONLY things that I supported were his attempts at immigration reform and lowering taxes, and maybe one or two more small things. (reform of GSEs and the attempt to reform education come to mind) Thats it. Not the Iraq war, barely Afghanistan, not the patriot act, nothing.
 
Oh dear. I'm saying "Nice doggie" while I search for a stick.



Liberals didn't support ANYTHING he did. You supported SOME of the things he did -- you said so:

Call me crazy but I think Ted the swimmer is a liberal and he wrote most of No Child Left Behind. George thought if you played nice with the libs they would love you and play fair. That made him very unpopular with conservatives then and now. I am waiting for one of you lefties to call Obama on just one of his lies. I am not however holding my breath.
 
...George thought if you played nice with the libs they would love you and play fair. That made him very unpopular with conservatives then and now...

:rotflmao:

This is comedy no? It sure gave me a good laugh.
 
He who laughs now, is having a good time..... and other pointless platitudes.
 
LMAO! Bullshit.

The conservatives were all too happy to suck Bush/Cheney's little, cut, dicks. Utopia was upon them. Only when the very policies, laws, practices, and politics that the conservatives had dreamed about came to pass and they were exposed as utter failures, and the resulting wipeouts in the following elections did they "find Jesus" of fiscal propriety.

No they created George Bush & Co., and abandoned him when it was clear that their monster would destroy them, as it has.

Karma, it's a bitch.


Conservatives were plenty unhappy with No Child Left Behind, which was an idea brought about under Clinton and was being written before Bush was even elected. It was certainly one of Bush's earliest fuck-ups as President.
 
Ok if it was Bush's fuck up, why are you blaming it on Clinton?

Bush didn't have to endorse it, he could have vetoed it if your assertion isn't just bunk.
 
It’s Beaulieu Merci Beaucoup, and sometimes it’s like the moth to the flame….

I do love a good flame.
 
Ok if it was Bush's fuck up, why are you blaming it on Clinton?

Bush didn't have to endorse it, he could have vetoed it if your assertion isn't just bunk.

I was giving you a little history. Namely, that one of Bush's first fuck ups as President that met with disapproval by conservatives was an idea that was launched under Clinton and embraced by Bush. (or to put it another way, which might help you, conservatives didn't like it because Bush embraced an idea put forward by a liberal, and one that greatly expanded the federal role in education)
 
Personally I think you should keep it. It identifies your posts to the casual reader immediately as a "kook" or radical fringe, whatever, and no need to read what you write. I would feel the same way about anyone that used a George Bush / John Wayne Gayce morph of some sort. (Not sure if there are any of those, just an example.)


Bush-the-Joker002-copy[1].jpg


Do you like this one better?
 
Back
Top