The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Bristol Palin says, "kids do better growing up in a mother/father home.", then calls kettle to comment on it's color.

I don't want to judge Bristol Palin for being a single mother who was never married, but if her mother had been a Democratic governor, Rush Limbaugh would have called Bristol a slut.

I'm not giving Bristol grief for being a single mom - I wish her good luck in that endeavor - but I am calling her out on her hypocrisy and holier-than-thou attitude.
 
I admire her for having her baby instead of the alternative, but when it comes to relationships, not so much.
 
So am I, in case you missed my point.

Ever think that as an unwed mother she is in a good position to know that children do better with a mother and a father? It is not hypocrisy to advise others no to make the same mistakes. Is it hypocrisy for an addict to advise against getting started?
Perhaps it is hypocrisy for those who have had the benefit of a mother and father to seek to deprive other children of the same opportunity.
 
Ever think that as an unwed mother she is in a good position to know that children do better with a mother and a father? It is not hypocrisy to advise others no to make the same mistakes. Is it hypocrisy for an addict to advise against getting started?
Perhaps it is hypocrisy for those who have had the benefit of a mother and father to seek to deprive other children of the same opportunity.

Do you mean like Republicans who go out of their way to make it unlawful for Gays and Lesbians to adopt unwanted Children?

Then yes, that would be hypocrisy. ..|
 
Ever think that as an unwed mother she is in a good position to know that children do better with a mother and a father? It is not hypocrisy to advise others no to make the same mistakes. Is it hypocrisy for an addict to advise against getting started?
Perhaps it is hypocrisy for those who have had the benefit of a mother and father to seek to deprive other children of the same opportunity.

Except as I said before the gender of the parents means nothing as there is no important role or trait that is not shared by both genders. As I mentioned before a hermaphrodite could raise healthy and productive kids.

She bags on gay parents even though they raise just children just as well as straight parents even though she clearly is a unwed mother who trapes around the country doing whatever she wants while other people raise her child, plus the fact that her own baby daddy has no role in her childs life shows she has no room to talk.

The hypocrisy stems from the Republicans who wish to ban unwanted children from being raised by loving gay parents.
 
Except as I said before the gender of the parents means nothing as there is no important role or trait that is not shared by both genders. As I mentioned before a hermaphrodite could raise healthy and productive kids.

She bags on gay parents even though they raise just children just as well as straight parents even though she clearly is a unwed mother who trapes around the country doing whatever she wants while other people raise her child, plus the fact that her own baby daddy has no role in her childs life shows she has no room to talk.

The hypocrisy stems from the Republicans who wish to ban unwanted children from being raised by loving gay parents.

Does that mean gays will not demand an EQUAL right to adopt children, and demand an end to discrimination favoring mother/father couples?
 
And then "Jersey Shore's" Jwoww wrote this somewhere "Bristol should keep her uneducated, ignorant mouth shut. If you're living in the past you wouldn't have a kid without marriage. Hypocrite. It's 2012!

"My best friend will get married one day and not just have civil union with his man. Stop hating people.""

Even though I only watched two episodes of the show and rarely google hot pictures of the guys, it's nice that she supports gay marriage.
 
Ever think that as an unwed mother she is in a good position to know that children do better with a mother and a father? It is not hypocrisy to advise others no to make the same mistakes. Is it hypocrisy for an addict to advise against getting started?
Perhaps it is hypocrisy for those who have had the benefit of a mother and father to seek to deprive other children of the same opportunity.

Total fucking horseshit.

There is no significant advantage to having two parents of the opposite sex in the household. Studies have demonstrated that children from homo homes are generally better adjusted than parents from the shattered hellscape of the American heteroburbic marriages.

Thinking that Bristol Palin is somehow a canary in the coal mine because she and her hetero baby daddy weren't mature enough to understand that parenting is more than just breeding and that she has any right or credibility to lecture same sex parents about what is best for children is risible, if not the height of inanity.

And the idea that homo parents are somehow 'depriving' a child of something is offensive and insulting beyond belief.

I have to say that your responses in this thread read like something from the keyboard of a white Christian bored housewife working the board in hopes of bringing sinners to the republican fold for Jesus.
 
BENVOLIO, ARE YOU GAY?

I am going to fucking ask that in every fucking topic where you post until I get a clear answer. Are you a homosexual, and if yes, how the fuck can you talk about children being deprived of anything with two loving parents just because those are of the same gender?!
 
I have to say that your responses in this thread read like something from the keyboard of a white Christian bored housewife working the board in hopes of bringing sinners to the republican fold for Jesus.

Exactly! This is both ridiculous and increasingly transparent.
 
BENVOLIO, ARE YOU GAY?

I am going to fucking ask that in every fucking topic where you post until I get a clear answer. Are you a homosexual, and if yes, how the fuck can you talk about children being deprived of anything with two loving parents just because those are of the same gender?!
Yes, I am gay. Every child deserves to have a mother and a father. The childs interests are more important that the rights of the prospective parents. Who has the right to tell a child that he or she does not get a mother? There have not been enough instances of gay couples raising children to adulthood to make valid conclusions as to the effect. It is still in the experimental stage.
 
Every child deserves to have a mother and a father. The childs interests are more important that the rights of the prospective parents. Who has the right to tell a child that he or she does not get a mother?

You make the common "Free Republic" fallacy that "the gays" are out to rip children from their mother's loving arms in order to force our "agenda" on good old God fearing America. It's as much of a sham as you are.

If you are a shill then I (begrudgingly) applaud the fact that you've gotten away with posting here for this long. If you are, indeed, a gay man, then I just feel sorry for how much you hate what you are.
 
Yes, I am gay. Every child deserves to have a mother and a father. The childs interests are more important that the rights of the prospective parents. Who has the right to tell a child that he or she does not get a mother? There have not been enough instances of gay couples raising children to adulthood to make valid conclusions as to the effect. It is still in the experimental stage.

This isn't some "clinical science" that we're talking about here.

We're talking about Mature adults taking on the responsibility of the care for, nurturing of, and supporting (both emotionally and financially) of other human beings.

I've read the word callous in this thread, and it's reasonable to say that word is representative of your response/post.

Do you care to elaborate?
 
Yes, I am gay. Every child deserves to have a mother and a father. The childs interests are more important that the rights of the prospective parents. Who has the right to tell a child that he or she does not get a mother? There have not been enough instances of gay couples raising children to adulthood to make valid conclusions as to the effect. It is still in the experimental stage.

I'm not buying it now.

Every child deserves to have love. And it doesn't matter that it is maternal or paternal love. I know a number of children of homo parents who are now adults and would be appalled at the crap you have left floating in this thread.

I frankly do not believe you are a homo. I can certainly declare without fear of being proven wrong that you are not gay.

How sad to live in the world you inhabit. But without children of your own, you have no experience or credibility in this matter. Cut your losses and wait for the next thread where you can explain to all of us why this is entirely the fault of brown immigrants.
 
Sorry kid. A nice mother and father would like to adopt you, but a gay couple are next on the list and their rights control. You don't get mother.
 
Sorry kid. A nice mother and father would like to adopt you, but a gay couple are next on the list and their rights control. You don't get mother.

Sorry kid, a nice gay couple would like to adopt you and make you feel loved, secure, and special, but gays are not allowed to adopt because of the nasty things they do to each other so you get to spend the next 15 years in the foster care system. You don't get parents.

I HOPE EVERYONE NOTES THAT, IN YOUR ANECDOTE, THE HETEROSEXUAL COUPLE IS NICE, LOVING (AND ALTHOUGH NOT EXPLICITLY STATED I'M SURE CHRISTIAN) WHILE THE HOMOSEXUAL COUPLE IS ONLY CONCERNED ABOUT "THEIR" EQUAL RIGHTS.

To have someone who claims to be gay fall back on the fear mongering stereotypes of the good, sweet, loving heterosexuals being cast aside and persecuted to further the self-serving homosexual agenda is absolutely and unequivocally repulsive.

You are a sham

You absolutely sicken me
 
Back
Top