J
johaninsc
Guest
dressed for dinner...

To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
I've always been torn on this issue. I recognize the reasons and philosophies behind the 2nd amendment, but also realize that a person's irrational fear does have an impact on the issue. I have handled firearms in the past, if a 22 counts as a firearmbut the only "weapons" I keep around the house are a couple of antique, Civil War era Naval dress swords.
I remember something my late uncle once said to me. He was a retired FBI agent (and was one of the investigators on the Patty Hearst kidnapping). I had ask him if he ever was afraid of a bad guy carrying a gun (I must have been about 12 or so). He replied that he rarely got concerned when a criminal had a gun because he (meaning my uncle) had a pretty good idea what the other guy was going to do with that gun. What concerned him more, was the innocent civilian who tried to help out. My uncle said he got afraid of the civilian because one never knew how well trained the civilian was or how often he or she had handled his or her weapon or exactly what emotional state the civilian was in at the time.
Federal law trumps a cheesy burro outlet. You can bring a gun into Chipotle. Now, watch someone will do it or shoot up the place. Americans like their guns and the most fanatic don't like to be told where they can't bring one.
Obviously, a court house is different an prohibiting guns there is obvious.
Chipotle must have a lame legal department.
So, no formal training? Former so-and-so is the same level of training George Zimmerman had.........that worked out great didn't it. And the NRA.......well there's a truly safety conscious organisation. Even you know they're fearmongering, money grubbing weasels.
You need more training than this for a drivers license.........and Buicks don't have high capacity magazines.
Wrong. The property owner has the final say in whether or not firearms are allowed on the property. Minnesota is a concealed carry state, and any business can (and most do) prohibit firearms on premises.
The only exception to this is rental property, where the renter is assumed to have the right to protect the property under his/her contractual control.
The NRA provides a great deal of the training for law enforcement in this country. They are recognized by most state governments as the most solid source for training. So it is indeed formal training. And the NRA is the world's largest firearms safety organization, with awards for its programs from very impartial groups.
As for a driver's license, you don't need any training at all -- you just have to pass a couple of tests.
edit: WRT my avatar, I want our Pink Pistols group to drop in on the local GOA group -- especially now that a couple of them may be getting married thanks to judge McShane.
Actually, they can ban open carry so long as they allow concealed. I forget the court case which decided that, but that's where the situation stands. Under most state concealed carry laws, they can't ban concealed anyway, so they're up against a double whammy, state and federal.
OTOH, some state laws don't let businesses ban either open or concealed.
The same NRA you hold in such low regard? How does that work?
Someone needs to do it from time to time, just to remind others that it is indeed a right. Yes, we have to live among other people, but I don't see where that means constantly catering to those too immature to respect others just exercising their rights.
Show me the statute that says a "Private business" must allow the general public to carry firearms? I own a "Private Business" I have posted at every building entrance, as well as the parking lot entrance, XYZ Bans firearms from this premises". Do you actually believe your gun rights supersede my property rights?
Is this the "Gun Owners of America" you're a member of?
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/Larry-PrattIs
And it can be said that gun owners are immature and so selfish that they don't think of why guns might bother people. You don't sit there and consider that maybe one of the people around you might have went through something that cause that fear. It is immature of you to not consider the people around you and why they feel the way they do.
And a fear that is not irrational considering it is designed to harm.
That gets me a "Page not found".
Some, possibly many of the states with right-to-carry laws list the only places guns aren't allowed (some state cut their list to "most government buildings" recently).
And yes, the right to keep and bear arms supersedes rights of property: the former is inherent, and the latter quite artificial.
